IFS Applications vs. Viewpoint Spectrum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IFS Applications
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum is a cloud-based construction ERP suite with project management, accounting, resource management, and reporting and analytics. Key features include workflow automation and collaboration tools, document imaging and sharing, cost estimating tools, and RFI management tools.N/A
Pricing
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Spectrum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Spectrum
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProspective buyers may contact vendor directly for a price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Spectrum
Features
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Spectrum
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.6
Ratings
94% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.0
Ratings
36% below category average
Pay calculation4.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Benefit plan administration4.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files3.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.3
Ratings
35% below category average
API for custom integration8.50 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Plug-ins8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.3
Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability10.00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.8
Ratings
8% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
3.6
Ratings
67% below category average
Dashboards7.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Standard reports7.50 Ratings3.30 Ratings
Custom reports9.00 Ratings2.40 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Accounts payable9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support9.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.50 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations8.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.50 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.6
Ratings
8% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.2
Ratings
24% below category average
Inventory tracking8.50 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Automatic reordering9.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location management9.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
5.4
Ratings
37% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Pricing8.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Order entry8.50 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Credit card processing6.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Cost of goods sold6.50 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Order Orchestration6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.4
Ratings
75% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Billing Management6.50 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting6.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Period Close8.50 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
2.7
Ratings
95% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Costing6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Capital Project Management2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.6
Ratings
62% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.7
Ratings
2% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers9.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality8.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools8.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
10.0
Ratings
29% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
3.3
Ratings
71% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
12% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared8.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Contract Repository7.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated9.50 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Supplier Management9.50 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.6
Ratings
35% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Risk Repository8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Management8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Detection6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.3
Ratings
6% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
6.2
Ratings
18% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Production Process Design8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
8.5
Ratings
18% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Forecasting7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Planning9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
IFS Applications
4.2
Ratings
52% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Proposal Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Spectrum
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Spectrum
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IFS ApplicationsViewpoint Spectrum
Likelihood to Recommend
Not every Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System does not cover all the industry verticals and all the functionalities and requirements for a specific industry as built-in features. Although IFS Applications does not completely cover all the requirements and all the industry verticals, it can be implemented for any industrial company with minimum configurations and customization, which is very good when implementing an ERP system. Since it supports web and mobile versions of the application as well, the users ind it easy to use.
Read full review
Viewpoint Spectrum would be fine for small to medium-sized companies. It would be great for transitioning from an in-house paper-based process, especially since it's designed with small construction companies in mind. They're making it even easier for smaller companies by offering additional features that you'd normally have to find in other products. However, companies can easily outgrow this system. We have about 15 years of data in the system, over 300 active jobs, and nearly 1,500 employees. In the past 3 years we've noticed slower performance and frequent locks in the system that require intervention from a system administrator. We moved to the cloud about 2 years ago and this has made troubleshooting even more difficult as we don't have the same access that we did before to resolve performance issues.
Read full review
Pros
  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Complex Inventory
Read full review
  • Dashboards make navigating to the crucial information quick and easy.
  • The layout with what we affectionately call the job info bar helps our project teams to quickly get where they need to go in the system.
  • Crystal reports are easily managed and integrated with Spectrum, giving us great flexibility in custom reports.
  • With a little training, and I mean a little, Spectrum is user friendly. Easy to create favorites/shortcuts for ease of use.
Read full review
Cons
  • Project Budget control other than Procurement
  • Customer Advance settlement process should be Manual rather then Auto Adjustment
  • IFS GSO Support should be more proactive
Read full review
  • Subcontract Kiosk can be glitchy - allows subs to overbill on subcontract billing items
  • Document Imaging can be glitchy - often says users do not have adequate security to view/add documents, but they do - if they sign out and back in, it works fine
  • At times, support can be lacking - sometimes case responses are delayed or you get an incorrect answer
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It checks all of our boxes at the moment.
Read full review
Usability
In overall, the companies get many advantages, where we can forget most of the things which can be considered for room for improvement. The user interface is good. It supports mobile versions an has several mobile applications for specific areas with Android, IOS and Windows versions. It allows several deployment options such as remote hosting, IFS Cloud hosting and on-premise hosting of the servers. IFS Applications can be easily and safely integrated with other systems.
Read full review
Some things in Spectrum are NOT that intuitive, but I think knowledge of the software just comes with time. There are still some things I need assistance with in Spectrum but I'm very comfortable with my day to day items now that I've been using it for years. However, if there is something I don't do often or haven't done before, I don't find the software to be that intuitive, I actually find the logic on some things to be a little weird but it's fine once I know how to do it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Very little down time. They host our system.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
For the most part the product is very reliable. Since we are hosted we sometimes have connectivity issues but I would say that is more our ISP than Spectrum.
Read full review
Support Rating
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
The support has recently changed. Last year, you could call in and get an immediate response. Now that doesn't seem possible unless you have an urgent situation with access to the software, payroll or payables. I have found that using chat or e-mail works nicely for the most part, but sometimes I feel it would be easier if someone from support would jump on our site and take a first-hand look rather than going back and forth
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Our trainer was excellent and navigated the time zone differences expertly. She gave us test assignments to complete and was available for questions at any time.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It is important to have a strong implementation partner. It made the transition from our old system to the new system easier.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartner’s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
Spectrum, when compared to Simply accounting, is better. It has more options, and it is easy to navigate. Spectrum meets our needs better. Spectrum, when compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate, is better. Spectrum has better connectivity between its project management system compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate. Spectrum, when compared to CMIC, I believe they are equal. CMiC has a better project management system, but Spectrum has an easier accounting system to navigate.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
You can grant user specific access which is nice. Project managers do not need all the same modules as Accounting. But Accounting does need access to PM modules as well
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact in terms of global process alignment.
  • Positive impact in terms of a single system of truth and reporting.
Read full review
  • Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us the opportunity to be proactive in analyzing the costs for a project in time to make a difference in the outcome of the project. It has allowed us defense in supporting our communications with the project owners.
  • Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us to become more productive with its accounting software and the cohesion between the modules. It has definitely streamlined the processing necessary to account for the business.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of