Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IFTTT | Score6.7 out of 10 | N/A | IFTTT is a marketing automation software solution offered by IFTTT. It is scaled for non-technical users and less complex, generally two-step connectors and API’s. | N/A |
![]() Zapier | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | The Zapier Automation Platform designed to integrate data between web apps. It is scaled for small to mid-sized businesses, with a functional but limited free version of the program. | $29.99 per month 750 tasks per month |

| IFTTT | Zapier | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | 33% discount for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||

| IFTTT | Zapier | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Verified User Chose IFTTT I initially was using Zapier for some of my simple integrations but started using IFTTT for some of our project work as it allowed me to do logical connections between applications. While it's great in some areas, it can be improved upon to allow for more deep configurations. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose IFTTT On inspection, it did not seem as simple to use. In fairness I was very happy with IFTTT and did not spend much time looking into Zapier Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Digital Marketing Analyst in Marketing at Orbis Education (Education Management, 51-200 employees) Chose IFTTT Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Senior Visual Designer in Research & Development at Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fundação Oswaldo Cruz) — Fiocruz (Research, 10,001+ employees) Chose IFTTT Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose IFTTT Honestly I use both, since Zapier is a bit more robust. However, IFTTT is much easier to use and configure. It is much more friendly. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() DIrector of Engagement in Marketing at Kindful (Non-Profit Organization Management, 1-10 employees) Chose IFTTT Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Founder at Copy Power, LLC (Marketing and Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose IFTTT Basically the same, though it seems Zapier can do more complex things. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() SaaS Administrator in Sales at Word of Life Fellowship (Religious Institutions, 501-1000 employees) Chose IFTTT IFTTT has more "end user" connections that Zapier thus making it more for users and less for power-users. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose IFTTT Zapier is a more in-depth if-then statement builder with way more detailed integrations to hundreds of applications as well as different tasks that can get implemented within your if then, then that statements. Way cooler and there are certification options that help you get to … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Insurance Advisor in Professional Services at Frost Insurance Agency (Insurance, 11-50 employees) Chose IFTTT Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Customer Success Manager in Customer Service at StudySoup (E-Learning, 11-50 employees) Chose IFTTT IFTTT is great for personal, home-life use, as it targets social media, personal email preferences, and home-automation devices. Zapier is much more business-oriented and does not provide integrations with Amazon Alexa or WeMo home devices. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose IFTTT Less programmatic capabilities, somewhat simpler design interface. More sophisticated events supported per task.
Ultimately, the kinds of tasks that need automation are simple, and a simple/easily maintainable user interface ensures no more time than is needed is spent on this … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Owner at Sixpence Events & Planning, LLC (Hospitality, 1-10 employees) Chose IFTTT I like that IFTTT is free and it’s just what I need for my business currently. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Oracle Certified HCM Cloud Consultant in Professional Services at Evosys (Computer Software, 501-1000 employees) Chose IFTTT While other paid services might give your a little extra features and possibly a connectivity with enterprise application, it's nearly impossible to beat IFTTT with the cost factor, ease of use, hundreds of channels and a great community of users. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Business Owner in Information Technology at Firmsecure Canada (Computer & Network Security, 11-50 employees) Chose IFTTT IFTTT has the most integrations, the least bug recipes and it is the cheapest alternative. IFTTT has also been in the game for years. Automation for the people! You cannot get the kind if ideas from any other integration site, and many are missing key apps like Instagram or … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | ![]() ![]() Co-Founder and CMO in Marketing at Bussi (Transportation/Trucking/Railroad, 11-50 employees) Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Digital Strategist in Marketing at OnQ Marketing (Marketing and Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier Zapier seemed better positioned to do what we need to do from a business perspective. I may be wrong but IFTTT seemed more personal/home use. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Principal in Corporate at Heyward CPA PLLC (Accounting, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Zapier I use Zapier for business-related tasks because their collection of apps is more conducive to this. I would use IFTTT for more consumer-related stuff like smart home automation, personal projects, etc. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Owner at Sixpence Events & Planning, LLC (Hospitality, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier They are different in look and feel, I like IFTTT for social media sharing (as an alternative to Edgar) but for logistics, email marketing, and lead acquisition, I prefer Zapier. Actually, I do use both, because I'm a small business I like to take advantage of free help and … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Zapier IFTTT I would compare to consumer software. Zapier is much more robust and has many more professional integrations. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Zapier While IFTTT provides some of the same functionality as Zapier, it is much less robust and doesn't have the same support or library of resources available. If you have any quantity of tasks you need to automate, Zapier is far superior and the price point is very reasonable for … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Verified User Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Co Founder at Optimi Ltd (Information Technology and Services, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Head Of Marketing in Marketing at AskNicely (Computer Software, 51-200 employees) Chose Zapier Better range of integrations. Easier workflow building. More B2B focus than IFTTT and faster time from trigger to action. The Zapier utilities like formatter and data storage also have become a big differentiator for us - they've evolved since we started using but have become … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Marketing Broker in Marketing at Atlas Internet Marketing LLC (Marketing and Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier Zapier versus IFTTT, in my opinion Zapier was much easier to get up and running faster without a lot of deep technical background especially with their zap making tool. Other API programs I have looked into had a higher cost, so that also made an impact with trying Zapier. We … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Intrapreneur, Internal Startup Co-Founder at CA Technologies (Computer Software, 10,001+ employees) Chose Zapier It has been a while since I looked at IFTTT, but I recall that Zapier was easier to use, more powerful and had more integrations. I started using Zapier and never looked back. The free version allowed me to build a couple of simple integrations and test it out. I used it for … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Head of Marketing at Snaptrip.com (Hospitality, 11-50 employees) Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Founder & Chief Educator in Corporate at 360 Video Academy (Media Production, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Creative Director in Marketing at Ada Bible Church (Religious Institutions, 51-200 employees) Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Online Marketing Analyst in Marketing at The Karcher Group (TKG) | Online Marketing & Web Development (Internet, 11-50 employees) Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Owner in Social Media at Learning in Bloom (E-Learning, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() General Manager at Frost Insurance Agency (Food & Beverages, 11-50 employees) Chose Zapier Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Vice President in Marketing at Wheatmark, Inc. (Publishing, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier Probably IFTTT comes closest to covering the features of Zapier. However, Zapier appears to have a lot more apps that can be connected and they provide a lot more educational support on their blog and emails. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Senior Director, Information Services at MarketScale (Media Production, 51-200 employees) Chose Zapier We actually utilize both Integromat and Zapier at our company, for all the reasons detailed in this review. Though Zapier is excellent for simple client integrations, we often run into internal use cases that require complexity that Zapier cannot provide. Specifically working … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() Web Marketing Consultant at Webporter (Internet, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier I found Zapier easier to use, and it had more integrations for the apps that I use. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() CEO and Founder in Corporate at Comunicano, Inc. (Marketing and Advertising, 11-50 employees) Chose Zapier Zapier is better but Tray had the ability to be more customizable. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() President & Founder in Corporate at Caylor Solutions, Inc. (Marketing and Advertising, 1-10 employees) Chose Zapier Better, more professional, and easier to use. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info ![]() VP of Business Development in Professional Services at ROBYN Promotions (Marketing and Advertising, 11-50 employees) Chose Zapier I'd consider Zapier a "pro-sumer" solution. It's not as powerful as more expensive solutions out there. But it's definitely for the business minded user. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |

| IFTTT | Zapier | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud Data Integration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||

| IFTTT | Zapier | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.7 (28 ratings) | 9.4 (110 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 (1 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Usability | 7.0 (4 ratings) | 9.0 (9 ratings) |
| Support Rating | 8.0 (5 ratings) | 1.0 (10 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |