TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IFTTT

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/AIFTTT is a marketing automation software solution offered by IFTTT. It is scaled for non-technical users and less complex, generally two-step connectors and API’s.N/A

    Zapier

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/AThe Zapier Automation Platform designed to integrate data between web apps. It is scaled for small to mid-sized businesses, with a functional but limited free version of the program.

    $29.99

    per month 750 tasks per month

    Pricing
    IFTTTZapier
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Starter
    $29.99
    per month 750 tasks per month
    Professional
    $73.50
    per month 2k tasks per month
    Team
    $103.50
    per month 2k tasks per month
    Company
    Contact Sales
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IFTTTZapier
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—33% discount for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IFTTTZapier
    Considered Both Products
    IFTTT
    Chose IFTTT
    I initially was using Zapier for some of my simple integrations but started using IFTTT for some of our project work as it allowed me to do logical connections between applications. While it's great in some areas, it can be improved upon to allow for more deep configurations.
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    On inspection, it did not seem as simple to use. In fairness I was very happy with IFTTT and did not spend much time looking into Zapier
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    IFTTT is free and easy to use, where Zapier has a freemium business model. We actually use both platforms for different things. I prefer Zapier for more complicated connections, where IFTTT allows us to have more connections without the added fee. Additionally, IFTTT allows us …
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    As IFTTT, Zapier also helps users to connect apps and services, but it seems more directed to the corporative world. While IFTTT provides support for home devices (as lighting and security systems) and voice assistants (Alexa, Cortana, Google Assistant, and Siri), Zapier …
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    Honestly I use both, since Zapier is a bit more robust. However, IFTTT is much easier to use and configure. It is much more friendly.
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    I haven't used Zapier extensively, but it seems that IFTTT is much simpler to set up. However, Zapier appears to be a much deeper integration where you can sync a variety of fields of data and customize the sync more than you can with IFTTT. Zapier may be more valuable for …
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    Basically the same, though it seems Zapier can do more complex things.
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    IFTTT has more "end user" connections that Zapier thus making it more for users and less for power-users.
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    Zapier is a more in-depth if-then statement builder with way more detailed integrations to hundreds of applications as well as different tasks that can get implemented within your if then, then that statements. Way cooler and there are certification options that help you get to …
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    Truthfully I use both of these products. IFTTT is a very robust app but it does not get any where near as robust as Zapier. But although Zapier is more robust, for simpler tasks IFTTT is not only easier to set up, but gets the job done just as well. And now that IFTTT is …
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    IFTTT is great for personal, home-life use, as it targets social media, personal email preferences, and home-automation devices. Zapier is much more business-oriented and does not provide integrations with Amazon Alexa or WeMo home devices.
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    Less programmatic capabilities, somewhat simpler design interface. More sophisticated events supported per task. Ultimately, the kinds of tasks that need automation are simple, and a simple/easily maintainable user interface ensures no more time than is needed is spent on this …
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    I like that IFTTT is free and it’s just what I need for my business currently.
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    While other paid services might give your a little extra features and possibly a connectivity with enterprise application, it's nearly impossible to beat IFTTT with the cost factor, ease of use, hundreds of channels and a great community of users.
    Incentivized
    Chose IFTTT
    IFTTT has the most integrations, the least bug recipes and it is the cheapest alternative. IFTTT has also been in the game for years. Automation for the people! You cannot get the kind if ideas from any other integration site, and many are missing key apps like Instagram or …
    Incentivized
    Zapier
    Chose Zapier
    In case of IFTTT at the very begining you could use any of them to solve the same problem but with the time IFTTT became more hardware automation and Zapier more software services automation so eventually I end up moving 100% to Zapier and I still think IFTTT has its own use …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Zapier seemed better positioned to do what we need to do from a business perspective. I may be wrong but IFTTT seemed more personal/home use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    IFTTT is much more open and extensible but doesn't come with nearly the amount of pre-baked integrations and pre-built workflows that Zapier does. When we first used Zapier years ago, IFTTT was more of a hobbyist/tinkerer platform and not primarily aimed at the enterprise …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Zapier is more robust than the other options - PieSync is more of a database normalization application; IFTTT seems to be more focused towards individual use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    I use Zapier for business-related tasks because their collection of apps is more conducive to this. I would use IFTTT for more consumer-related stuff like smart home automation, personal projects, etc.
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    They are different in look and feel, I like IFTTT for social media sharing (as an alternative to Edgar) but for logistics, email marketing, and lead acquisition, I prefer Zapier. Actually, I do use both, because I'm a small business I like to take advantage of free help and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    IFTTT I would compare to consumer software. Zapier is much more robust and has many more professional integrations.
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    While IFTTT provides some of the same functionality as Zapier, it is much less robust and doesn't have the same support or library of resources available. If you have any quantity of tasks you need to automate, Zapier is far superior and the price point is very reasonable for …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Zapier is a one of a kind product. It's the only SMB product that provides these kinds of integrations. A few other products do similar things (Segment, IFTTT), but those are a little different. Segment is a little more enterprise focused, and IFTTT is a free product for users, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    • IFTTT just doesn't have enough power to be useful for us. It doesn't connect to tools we want to use and doesn't provide the kinds of triggers and actions we need.
    • PieSync is going to be useful for a different kind of workflow, where you need to keep two or more systems in sync …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Better range of integrations. Easier workflow building.
    More B2B focus than IFTTT and faster time from trigger to action.
    The Zapier utilities like formatter and data storage also have become a big differentiator for us - they've evolved since we started using but have become …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Zapier versus IFTTT, in my opinion Zapier was much easier to get up and running faster without a lot of deep technical background especially with their zap making tool. Other API programs I have looked into had a higher cost, so that also made an impact with trying Zapier. We …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    It has been a while since I looked at IFTTT, but I recall that Zapier was easier to use, more powerful and had more integrations. I started using Zapier and never looked back. The free version allowed me to build a couple of simple integrations and test it out. I used it for …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    I don't know of anything else that does what zapier does. Some people compare IFTTT but that's like comparing a laptop to an abacus. (zapier is the laptop and IFTTT the abacus). Zapier is fantastic, and the pricing also means you pay little when you use it little, and pay more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Zapier beats IFTTT for the shear customization and flexibility it has. If you want something simple, like IFTTT, Zapier can do that – no problem. But if you want complexity like running scripts on data points, converting time/date formats, multi-step zaps ("recipes" in IFTTT,) …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Although IFTTT was the original web services connector, I have always felt that Zapier bested them with their preset templates. Zapier also connected more business web services than IFTTT when I signed up for Zapier. The product that Zapier delivered has always felt more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    On the surface it is easy to group IFTTT and Zapier together because they both make it possible to connect web applications together through a simple interface. But Zapier is a much more powerful business tool, better suited for connecting information platforms and data. IFTTT …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Zapier integrates with many more apps than IFTTT and I find it does not have as many glitches. For some reason, not all my "applets" in IFTTT would work all the time, whereas with Zapier I have not run into the same issue. If you are a business, invest in Zapier over IFTTT to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    I love Zapier, but have also been an avid user of IFTTT. One thing i do enjoy about IFTTT is its price structure. Meaning it is free. Zapier charges after you have created so many ZAPS but IFTTT does not. Zapier does have much more functionality which i do like quite a bit.
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Probably IFTTT comes closest to covering the features of Zapier. However, Zapier appears to have a lot more apps that can be connected and they provide a lot more educational support on their blog and emails.
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    We actually utilize both Integromat and Zapier at our company, for all the reasons detailed in this review. Though Zapier is excellent for simple client integrations, we often run into internal use cases that require complexity that Zapier cannot provide. Specifically working …
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    I found Zapier easier to use, and it had more integrations for the apps that I use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Zapier is better but Tray had the ability to be more customizable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    Better, more professional, and easier to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Zapier
    I'd consider Zapier a "pro-sumer" solution. It's not as powerful as more expensive solutions out there. But it's definitely for the business minded user.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    IFTTTZapier
    Cloud Data Integration
    Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of IFTTT and Zapier
    Feature
    IFTTT
    6.7
    24 Ratings
    Zapier
    8.6
    105 Ratings
    Pre-built connectors7.824 Ratings9.2102 Ratings
    Connector modification6.217 Ratings7.990 Ratings
    Support for real-time and batch integration6.916 Ratings8.389 Ratings
    Data quality services5.17 Ratings8.770 Ratings
    Data security features7.610 Ratings9.269 Ratings
    Monitoring console6.516 Ratings8.278 Ratings
    User Ratings
    IFTTTZapier
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (28 ratings)
    9.4
    (110 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (9 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    1.0
    (10 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)