ignio AIOps vs. VuNet Systems

-Autonomous alert and incident management related to infrastructure, NW, and applications. -Excellent fit to handle CPU, memory, and disk space alert management - proactive and predictive. -Several automation features (self-healing) - CPU/Memory modifications; disk extensions; patch management -Provisioning of user access and infrastructure servers, etc.

I definitely [recommend] VuNet Systems for the following. 1. Richness of reports. 2. Ease of use. 3. Strong support team. 4. Flexibility in changing the product road map according to our requirements. 5. Acknowledging and Appreciating our feedback. 6. Improving and prioritizing the product features. 7. Brings confidence and confirmations to the decisions.

• ignio handles 100+ use cases covering the entire organization including applications and infrastructure.
• Centralize the dashboard to view and executed the health of systems in our environment.
• It handles CA services desk Incidents and requests. Using automated tools with power shell scripts.
• ignio event management helps the organization to manage the alerts well and make an informed decision.

• VuNet Systems provides real-time visibility on the health and performance of all the components
• Flexibility to ingest data from variety of data sources
• Ability to handle huge volume to data and to integrate with tools like Microsoft teams to get the real-time alerts
• Real-time insights and ease to use tool to perform detail analysis
• Team technical knowledge and capability to implement complex requirements

• There is a lot more the desktop tool can do. For example, we need to apply an upgrade to get the tool to talk to our infrastructure while employees are working from home. The tool was initially installed with the assumption that the desktops would be in UserLand. Instead after COVID-19 the desktop/laptops have been used for over a year on people's home networks. As of right now, we have to sync when the devices are connected to VPN. Moving forward with the upgrade, we will be getting this data over TLS when they are connected to the untrusted networks.
• The concept of ignio AlOps requires OCM efforts within most operational teams. This isn't necessarily the fault of the tool itself, but when implementing ignio, or any AIOps tool, the team will get a lot of pushback as an outside team is centralizing the operational improvements. The tool should have a centralized intake process that will allow the collection, ranking, and management of automation opportunities. ignio AlOps should then simulate the proposed efficiencies from implementing something within the backlog. Right now a lot of local teams are having a hard time getting on the same page as the enterprise teams, and a common methodology for prioritizing (even if overly simplistic) would go a long way to enterprise planning.
• These tools are very new and things get added to them all the time. There should be a way for the product's stakeholders and process owners to understand the additional value ignio AlOps is gaining over time.

• Some of the items being worked on in the roadmap include automated discovery, improved correlation and automated resolution of incidents.
• VuNet Systems platform does not provide code level visibility. They are not in this space.

It is a very good product and it helps our organization.

ignio AIOps version upgrades were a heavy lift. Having to learn a new language versus an industry standard language took time. More consideration on overall internal long-term support needs to be determined.

Incentivized

Comparably the tool is simple to configure and roll out. It does the heavy duty analysis and provides actionable insights. Features to feed insights, fine tune the log interpretation, reminder service to adjust the threshold levels for a workload performance need to be added. Training programs for Monitoring teams if improved this could be an amazing tool for DC elements and IT teams

It was up than Dynatrace

Incentivized

Looks good at the moment

We have built a healthy relationship with the vendor support team throughout the implementation phase, all incidents raised were resolved within the SLA without a fail

Given this rating because they have provided us great support throughout the implementation process and post-implementation as well.

Implementation team has provided necessary training & enablement.

Online training materials are shared by the implementation team and it was good.

I am happy with the way team has implemented and shared the product for our organization. However, would like to see it get extended to the other line of business too.

We generally use Ignio AIOps. It is flexible and works well for AIOPS.

Quite Scalable!

• ignio has had a positive impact on our organization by saving 7,000+ hours within Operations and automatically resolving 84% of our service requests.
• ignio has increased our alert coverage by over 60%.

• We can say it had a very positive impact if we are speaking in terms of ROI. As the result that we got for the time and efforts invested in implementing VuNet in our organization is really great.