Imperva Data Security vs. Trellix Data Center Security Suite

Compliance to audits and HiTrust certification. It is key in ensuring that our audits are completed in a timely manner with no repeats of data requests and that we also are HiTrust certified at our organization. Personally while the data obfuscation is available I am not sure I would fully trust that the data is completely sanitized if need be. It's not against the Imperva product but more of issue of data being used.

Incentivized

It is well suited for McAfee’s monitoring and virtual patching solutions for huge data and there are more features like automated discovery, port scans, and patch status, password integrity, and protections for database-specific risks.

Incentivized

• The options available for auditing are outstanding.
• The system has very good reliability and tuning options for the agents on the servers.
• The data gathered is fantastic and presented in a format that is easily readable for auditors.
• For on prem usage our servers have had no issues. The Linux is extremely resilient and we have no issues with the boxes.

Incentivized

• McAfee’s monitoring and virtual patching solutions

Incentivized

• Alerts require a lot of tuning to get actionable intelligence
• Certain common encryption ciphers are incompatible with Imperva and have to be disabled at the server level
• Technical support is sometimes a little hard to work with

• There is a area of improvement in cloud version

Incentivized

Due to support issues only.

We did not get much expertise in the limited support extended by the Mcafee team.

The Forecepoint product which we evaluated was better but this was a decision taken by the entire group.

• Allowed us to meet important compliance requirements.
• When protecting critical data, we can see exactly how it's being used and by whom.
• Licensing costs are very reasonable.
• It takes a fair amount of administration to use properly.

• It has a positive impact on over data security and helps in managing data.

Incentivized