Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) vs. Reblaze

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
The Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) is based on technology acquired with Incapsula and the former WebSphere WAF.N/A
Reblaze
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Reblaze is a comprehensive web security solution from the company of the same name in Sunnyvale. It includes DDoS protection, intrusion prevention, bot mitigation, and can be extended with web application firewall (WAF), anti-scraping, as well as CDN integration with autoscaling, load balancing, and real time management console with remote monitoring capabilities.N/A
Pricing
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)Reblaze
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)Reblaze
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)Reblaze
User Ratings
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)Reblaze
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)Reblaze
Likelihood to Recommend
If you are looking for a cheap product to meet the bare minimum requirements for PCI or any other compliance regulations, this is not the product. Also, the WAF portion only inspects on HTTP/HTTPS traffic which can be very limiting into other forms of web apps that utilize other protocols. The HTTP/HTTPS inspection that it does do is very in depth and well worth the investment.
Read full review
Reblaze is awesome service with following services which i feel more well suited :- Bot management , easy to integrate and use. DNS and SSL certification management. Easy to integrate Cloud services like Azure, Aws and GCP. i personally found it less appropriate/ hard to use and integrate :- automated resource scaling
Read full review
Pros
  • Alert Aggregation - Correlates different violations into perceived correlated attacks.
  • Ease of deployment - as one of the only WAFs that allow bridge mode deployment, this can be deployed with without downtime and no Network Architecture modifications. If the need for proxy is required at a later time, Transparent Reverse Proxy can be deployed within seconds and minimal configuration.
  • Custom Policies - Custom security policies are easy to configure.
  • Reporting - There are a good amount of pre-configured reports available by default.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • The UI can use a little work (but is largely decent)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
There are just a couple of points that are hard to find, that probably could be elsewhere. But these are minor; everything else is right where you'd expect it to be.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We haven't needed support from Imperva since implementation. But during that time, their personnel were very quick to respond to questions. Since then, it's been largely doing its thing for us (which is exactly what we'd hoped).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Ultimately, it was the easiest to work with that was still a "known" company (we've been burned too many times by up-and-comers). We needed something that gave us a lot of control but then didn't need its handheld on a daily basis. Imperva gives us a lot of that and we are still able to navigate it with ease.
Read full review
none , i wasn't involved in process of choosing this service.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our on-prem firewall has less work to do, allowing it more cycles for other tasks.
  • We have better web traffic visibility and control over what actors are doing outside our network.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots