InEight vs. Workamajig

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
InEight's modular project controls software connects complex project data to improve visibility and delivery in capital construction.N/A
Workamajig
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
InEightWorkamajig
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
InEightWorkamajig
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsInEight offers a modular, integrated project controls platform. Because the InEight platform covers the entire construction lifecycle, customers purchase the software based on their specific needs – purchasing stand-alone products, a bundle of products, or the entire platform. As a result, the pricing will vary depending on the specific product, number of users and length of contract. Once InEight has identified the highest impact areas, they offer potential customers a custom proposal. The options they consider include: Per user pricing: typically annual subscriptions. Revenue-based: using a percentage of the customer’s revenue. Project-based: software use dedicated to a specific project or program of work.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
InEightWorkamajig
Considered Both Products
InEight
Chose InEight
I've used SAP for more than 10 years before my current job in this company. The best thing in SAP, is exactly what I have commented before, it's a single one tool, that does all what InEight do.
Here at CCC, we have COINS for cost management, and I don't know exactly if InEight …
Chose InEight
InEight seems to be an improvement on SAP BPC, though I haven't used SAP BPC for invoice processing, But in terms of planning, forecasting, budgeting and variance analysis. InEight has an edge because it is mor user friendly and the data you get is more streamlined and fit for …
Chose InEight
InEight has been the first product that I have used and I wouldn't change it. Coming up from a hand to staff it has made my job easier to perform. Easier to keep track of quantities, hours, production being made throughout the project and makes it easier to access work plans …
Chose InEight
The two items that set InEight apart was the estimating module with the ability to track cost to the exact estimate line item and the ability to export manhours to payroll. The other software's were either lacking or deficient in these items.
Chose InEight
InEight Estimate integrated with SAP much easier and the overall GUI was much nicer. easy decision
Chose InEight
Both Sage Estimating and InEight programs have their unique capabilities. Sage Estimating is much more configured for use in detailed construction, the majority of which are for non-nuclear projects. InEight has so many more capabilities, especially in creating our own …
Chose InEight
We've evaluated the project controls functions, but they aren't as functional as InEight Estimate
Chose InEight
InEight is perfect for our work in Heavy Civil construction. Some of the other products are designed for different workflows and industries. We chose InEight specifically because it was related to the construction industry. Procore is incredibly comprehensive, and we just don't …
Chose InEight
InEight provides the tools that my business needs and its programs are geared troward the industry.
Chose InEight
We looked at HCSS and Bid 2 Win but chose Ineight due to the fact that it seemed more user friendly, plus I had used it at a former company when it was available from the Grantlun Corporation and was very familiar with it in its ease of use and reliability.
Chose InEight
No others were evaluated at this time
Chose InEight
heavy bid is okay for bid item work and has a few things in the quote folder screen that are nice and user friendly but the ability to tag is not as useful.
Chose InEight
InEight is more robust than the other services I have used. I think it does a better job of rolling up a massive amount of individual user data into one complete project progress report. I like that most of our clients also use it, which makes collaboration easier. I think it …
Chose InEight
InEight exceeded our expectations from [the] capability to cost. This product selection was a no-brainer for our department.
Chose InEight
Ecosys is used for project management reporting while InEight is used for document management.
Chose InEight
InEight is cheaper than both. It is more functional than Aconex, but not iTWO. InEight's GUI needs the most work to improve.
Chose InEight
I would prefer Aconex but the cost is too high. The overall layout and feel of Aconex are modern compared to InEight.
Chose InEight
  1. Allows you to save all file types to a document, easily identify which formats you do and don’t have and manage which formats you issue.
  2. Great bulk functionality. Manage multiple projects and large volume of documentation easily with less staff.
Chose InEight
As an issuing tool, InEight's TeamBinder is on par with Aconex. Solidworks EPDM creation of review workflows and revision numbering is better placed with handling multiple versions of the same document with the ability to revert to older versions if required. InEight's support …
Chose InEight
I have used Aconnex and have found InEight to be more flexible and works in partnership with us to provide the best solution.
Chose InEight
InEight has superior functionality over all of these systems.
Workamajig
Chose Workamajig
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on …
Chose Workamajig
We've used QuickBooks and it didn't align well with our business, so there were a lot of insights I wanted from the numbers, but couldn't get. We use Basecamp, which is easy, but can get disorganized pretty quickly and takes discipline to stay structured.
Chose Workamajig
WMJ is a fully integrated system. Accounting, time management, invoicing, project management, estimating, sales CRM, all occur in one integrated package. This is ultimately why we selected WMJ. Other packages do portions of the workflow well but don't always integrate via …
Chose Workamajig
Workamajig was definitely a lot easier to keep track of projects, timesheets, and out of office calendars all in one. ClickUp and Zoho were good for project management but JIG definitely has more to offer and it's a little easier to clean. Keeping track of campaigns is much …
Chose Workamajig
Personally WMJ is my least favorite project management program of those I've used in jobs past, but it was not my decision to use it and I believe our company has been utilizing it for many, many years. To be fair and put this in perspective, my interactions with WMJ probably …
Chose Workamajig
Customization and Project Request submission were two of the biggest draws that our organization valued back when our contract with Workamajig started. Those two features were deemed more important than some of its inadequacies. However, the project management products have …
Chose Workamajig
Daylite is not as robust of a program but their mobile options are far superior and are best for smaller companies.
Chose Workamajig
The UI is probably the worst I have used. The redundancy in completing tasks is annoying. I did not choose this product.
Chose Workamajig
Workamajig definitely isn't the prettiest among the project management tools I've used, nor does it have the friendliest UX/UI. But it does have some advantages when it comes to automating tasks in a schedule, automatically replacing versions of files with the same name and …
Features
InEightWorkamajig
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
InEight
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
InEight
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing5.70 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools4.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
InEight
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
InEight
-
Ratings
Workamajig
4.9
Ratings
44% below category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
InEight
-
Ratings
Workamajig
6.7
Ratings
12% below category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
InEightWorkamajig
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
InEightWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
InEightWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
Compared to other Estimating software I have used, InEight has superior capabilities and features. The ability to use a line item or an assembly to create an estimate is an outstanding feature of the program. The ability to create crew rates and use them in the estimate is a handy feature, especially when estimating construction projects.
Read full review
I think this holds true to almost any CRM, but if you want to truly utilize it you sort of need to go all in. This can become tough with WMJ because it doesn't offer some critical options that many other CRMs do, like the ability to create and send emails, e-newsletters, to throttle and invite outside clients to look at projects, etc. As such we're pairing Workamajig with Hubspot (and slowly phasing out Mailchimp) and trying to keep the data clean and flowing between them all is pretty tough. I'm also not aware of any API bridge from Wordpress to Workamajig so while I can program and feed my leads from my site into the other spaces, Workamajig remains a manual entry for any insertions you want, even if simply as a CSV import.
But - if you're not worried about that and simply want to manage projects, budget time, and scope things, it's a robust system allowing you to do so.
Read full review
Pros
  • Tracking labor and equipment hours to specific estimated scope line items
  • Creating detailed work breakdown structures within Estimate and using that same structure to apply cost to during the job
  • Creating custom data blocks in control to track progress and create forecasts
Read full review
  • WMJ is a full-stack solution, so you can track the life of a project from beginning to end, and all of the financials associated with it.
  • Time entry is easy.
  • Project management is robust and yields a tremendous amount of information.
  • WMJ has a "sheets"-based interface, which makes navigating thru modules easier.
  • There is more than one way to complete any particular task.
Read full review
Cons
  • We do not use the search engine since it was last modified. It is no longer user friendly.
  • We used to like the way we could change the position of line items. The function has been changed to where it is not user friendly anymore.
  • The "Save" and "Delete" options are right next to each other. I have been after Ineight to change these for a long time but they have not.
Read full review
  • Auto-schedule population - The most inconvenient thing about using JIG was that the dates wouldn't auto-populate. Example: I move the review date but the rest of the dates stay the same. Depending on each project level, if one date is adjusted the rest should update as well. That way we aren't spending a lot of time moving dates around manually.
  • Notifications - JIG should have desktop notifications so we can see when tasks are on us even when we aren't in JIG.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Some features with InEight's TeamBinder are worthy of single use, however the review feature and subsequent revision and version numbering could be improved. We will be aiming to roll out the package to encompass our internal documentation in the near future and will be in a better position to judge the usability after that point in time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I would give it an 8 out of 10 because the software can be a bit cumbersome to new users. It also takes a long time to set up the library and input all of your companies needs so that the software will provide the level of service required to estimate projects. However, once the software is set up it is a powerful tool. We only use a portion of what the software is capable of delivering
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Every time I have contacted support, they have gotten back to [me] quickly and with a few solutions. I like that they seem to be US-based, so there is no language barrier when I try to communicate my problem. For the few times, they did not have a solution ready, they told me they would respond later after further research, and they actually followed up! Better than most support I have used in the past with other software.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Since the original inception, I have been required to overhaul the system so that it is more user friendly and combines both aspects of our business, documentation and drawings. Being able to control revision and version numbering has been a key struggle that only staff training has been able to mark this as complete.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I've used SAP for more than 10 years before my current job in this company. The best thing in SAP, is exactly what I have commented before, it's a single one tool, that does all what InEight do. Here at CCC, we have COINS for cost management, and I don't know exactly if InEight would be able to do whatever that COINS does, but what I'm trying to say is that, for systems, as much less external communication, better. InEight is covering a great portion on planning, we will see schedule and estimate, it will definitely improve, so, waiting on that to see.
Read full review
We've used QuickBooks and it didn't align well with our business, so there were a lot of insights I wanted from the numbers, but couldn't get. We use Basecamp, which is easy, but can get disorganized pretty quickly and takes discipline to stay structured.
Read full review
Scalability
InEight is a good system that has scaled nicely as the company has grown. the tools are still readily available and applicable for our larger scope of work. It has kept up with the growth of the company very nicely
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • We have gone from an $6.5M per year company to over $10M per year since integrating InEight in 2018
  • Job costing has really helped us to understand where the money is going and how to manage it better.
  • Being able to compare different estimates has sped up the estimation process and allowed us to be more competitive.
Read full review
  • The subscription expense and IT overhead has been substantial. That being said at the time of implementation, most other competing platforms were in line with their pricing.
  • As more competitive alternatives have come to market we would have probably gone with an entirely cloud base alternative at a lower price.
  • We ended up with ClickUp as our primary project management platform. If our finance/accounting software wasn't already so integrated with Workamjig we would probably switch to it entirely.
Read full review
ScreenShots

InEight Screenshots

Screenshot of InEight Estimate’s Benchmarking feature, which allows users to compare high, low, and average costs, as well as productivity rates from past projects, to visually assess whether current estimates fall within a realistic range. With historical performance data at their fingertips, estimators can bid more strategically and deliver more reliable, data-driven estimates.Screenshot of InEight Estimate’s CBS Register, which provides a user-specific view of an estimate, allowing users to create unlimited WBS structures and custom rollups. With parametric cost item assemblies, estimators can generate more accurate, reliable, and data-driven estimates.Screenshot of InEight Document’s Dashboard, that delivers a centralized, visual view of project information across all modules. Interactive dashboard tiles make it easy to track document activity and maintain visibility into project performance.Screenshot of InEight Document’s Gallery, which offers a comprehensive visual library of all project-related files—including drawings, photos, and documents—so teams can quickly access and manage the content they need from one intuitive location.Screenshot of InEight Schedule’s Risk Management feature, which enables project teams to evaluate schedules through a risk-adjusted lens. By visualizing scenarios with varying confidence levels, teams can anticipate potential impacts and plan with greater certainty.Screenshot of InEight Change’s PCO Summary dashboard that delivers a visual summary of all potential change orders. This helps project teams evaluate impacts, track approvals, and manage changes proactively for better cost and scope control.