INFUSE vs. Metadata.io

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
INFUSE
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Since 2012, INFUSE (formerly INFUSEmedia) has helped clients and partners craft and optimize demand programs that deliver the audience, buyer, and account engagement that meets their objectives, by strategically promoting content through omnichannel campaigns leveraging AI technology and first-party data.N/A
Metadata.io
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Based in San Francisco, Metadata.io is a Demand Generation and ABM platform designed to execute thousands of B2B campaigns in a matter of hours, automatically optimizing campaigns for pipeline impact at a high velocity.
$295
per month per installation
Pricing
INFUSEMetadata.io
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
MetaMatch
$295
per month per installation
Web Personalization
$24,000
per year
Audience Targeting
$24,000
per year
Metadata Base Platform
$60,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
INFUSEMetadata.io
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$2,500 one-time fee per installation
Additional DetailsINFUSE crafts demand programs on a cost per lead (CPL) basis. No subscription or setup fees.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
INFUSEMetadata.io
Considered Both Products
INFUSE
Chose INFUSE
I use multiple vendors in my bench and make sure I can manage several campaigns at once. INFUSE makes sure we have defined goals, objectives and ROI. Every time I bring a new project we are able to work together to create a strategic plan. We work together to review the results …
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE still has the ability to generate leads with a higher lead scoring compared to other vendors. Although pricing is a little steep, as long as budget allows, we will definitely go back to INFUSE for high quality leads instead of just quantity.
Chose INFUSE
Personally, I have only worked with Infuse for content syndication.
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE are much easier to work on in the briefing stage where other competitors often over complicate what should be a simple campaign.
Chose INFUSE
On par with INFUSE in terms of quality, both companies are pushing innovation and coming up with different products and services to better engage with prospects on behalf of clients.
Chose INFUSE
Many content syndication vendors operate in the same way, but I have seen a higher conversion rate on INFUSE leads from past campaigns.
Chose INFUSE
At the top of the list for quality, but somewhere in the middle on cost.
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE stacks up well - leads are always delivered on time and we dont get negative feedback from clients. Previews are always well written and when a breif is sent over its understood rather than a lot of questions and extra detail needed
Chose INFUSE
We are working with many content syndication and BANT lead gen companies. INFUSE is one of the top vendors we have seen some great success with. The targeting is all on point and accurate, the content and assets they help us create are all in line with our brand guidelines, and …
Chose INFUSE
From a price point perspective, INFUSE delivered on our campaigns and programs at a lower cost point, allowing us to run many more campaigns, which improved our metrics and corporate KPIs. Their attention to detail was paramount, even with running multiple campaigns, which were …
Chose INFUSE
I use Netline quite a bit, too, for lead generation. They are solid tool for promotion. However, I don't get as high of email opens and CTRs as I do with INFUSE.
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE mainly beat competitors with its ability to have quicker and more frequent responses. Their responsiveness wasn't just about speed, but also about the quality of communication. The INFUSE team took the time to understand our specific needs and goals, offering strategic …
Chose INFUSE
We have used other competitors, but the pricing and service at INFUSE are hard to beat!
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE has more program options compared to other vendors, in my experience (i.e., telemarketing and surveys). They will also customize the program based on your needs and budgets. They are pretty comparable cost wise to other vendors.
Chose INFUSE
INFUSE is better suited for ABM. The managed service also beats the user-interfaces of other platforms.
Chose INFUSE
There is a reason why SUSE has used INFUSE for multiple years now - other Lead Generation Companies do not compare.
Chose INFUSE
I've found INFUSEmedia to have more diverse and customizable versions of content syndication than other partners that we have considered and run with. Their pricing is competitive and the value adds they have provided for certain strategies have further helped them to stack up …
Metadata.io
Chose Metadata.io
Metadata is way more cleaner in UI. Especially the UI of Facebook ad management is truly a horror show, glad to reduce my time spent in there.
Chose Metadata.io
Pricing. You can't beat metadata's metamatch audience package. Clearbit charges on a CPM basis on the amount of spend used on a certain audience while metadata is a flat fee
Chose Metadata.io
Metadata has way deeper functionality with social networks than many of their competitors, but fall short in display advertising comparatively.
Chose Metadata.io
We choose Metadata.io because their solution would bring B2B targeting on all platforms. Other providers only offer this feature only on Facebook. Metadata.io also works as a campaign management platform, meanwhile, other providers only create audiences that are pushed to the …
Chose Metadata.io
These aren't apples-to-apples comparisons: I used Triblio at a previous company. Triblio is primarily for ABM display and you can have smaller audience pools (to the company level). Metadata has a display ad component that I am not currently licensed for. Triblio has added ABM …
Chose Metadata.io
We chose [Metadata.io] because it was a smaller company and could get more personalized attention. The price was better and they seemed more eager to support us. The feature set was what we were looking for and not more - it was exactly as robust as we needed it to be. Didn't …
Chose Metadata.io
Metadata made it much easier and quicker for us to experiment and test our different campaigns and audiences as well as drive valuable results.
Chose Metadata.io
Rollworks use case was more traditional ABM. Metadata is truly a paid social powerhouse for us. It's integral to our paid social program. It has more audience & ad capabilities as well.
Best Alternatives
INFUSEMetadata.io
Small Businesses
Sitecore Send
Sitecore Send
Score 10.0 out of 10
Sitecore Send
Sitecore Send
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
INFUSEMetadata.io
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
INFUSEMetadata.io
Likelihood to Recommend
From our first exchange they have been very responsive. They listen carefully to our needs and importantly they deliver against our requirements. They are agile, flexible and come to the table with new ideas. We at Siemens see them as a strategic partner at this stage and I hope we continue to work productively in to the future.
Read full review
Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least). This is because the power of metadata lies in the ability to quickly set up and run a large number of experiments (combinations of channel, audience, creative, and conversion assets). To evaluate these variations, all of them need a large number of impressions, clicks, and conversions to be statistically relevant. If your budget is smaller, you will either have a very small number of experiments (not fully utilizing the power of metadata), or your experiments will not have enough clicks to make informed decisions. We had expected a better explanation of this from metadata before signing up.
Read full review
Pros
  • Tracking/monitoring leads is super easy and in-depth through their Demand Accelerator portal.
  • Customer experience and support is top tier. The team is always trying to understand how they can best support us and our goals.
  • Providing high-quality leads that are aligned with our target personas.
Read full review
  • Best paid ops tool I've ever used (and I've used a lot): we can launch a new LinkedIn & Facebook campaign in minutes.
  • Lead gen ops: no more dealing with broken zapier zaps, we are able to automate pushing native lead gen leads directly to our CRM.
  • Attribution: see influenced & triggered opportunities/CW deals
  • Multivariate testing: Metadata scales audience, ad, creative testing so you learn what performs much faster than manual process
Read full review
Cons
  • I think providing a quarterly highlights document would be particularly helpful without asking. We ask every quarter and it creates a bit of a bottleneck for us.
  • Communication via email can get exhausting. Can we explore having a joint Slack channel for collaboration?
Read full review
  • It was difficult to set goals on the individual campaign level vs. all ad campaigns
  • It seems like the automation in-platform is better than what Metadata provides so you can have better results running ads natively.
  • They have some work to do to improve the user experience for running experiments because it is one of their best features but it's hard to use.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Overall great product and client service
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
INFUSE was able to get our campaigns up and running, allowing us the ability to migrate qualified leads down to our sales team. INFUSE also went a step above, by providing call scripts and prescribed touchpoints along the qualifing journey, allowing our sales teams more time to schedule follow-up meetings and create opportunities that generated potential review.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
INFUSE has always been very responsive. I appreciate the check ins once campaigns are live, to discuss results and see where we could make adjustments. I haven't used their Demand Gen experts yet but I love that that's available to optimize your programs.
Read full review
Metadata's customer support is a difference-maker! They really do care how well your campaigns perform and will help you improve them.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We are working with many content syndication and BANT lead gen companies. INFUSE is one of the top vendors we have seen some great success with. The targeting is all on point and accurate, the content and assets they help us create are all in line with our brand guidelines, and the lead quality is one of the best out of all of our vendors.
Read full review
These aren't apples-to-apples comparisons: I used Triblio at a previous company. Triblio is primarily for ABM display and you can have smaller audience pools (to the company level). Metadata has a display ad component that I am not currently licensed for. Triblio has added ABM features like personalized landing pages and resource hubs specific to target companies which have the potential to be really effective. I evaluated Influ2. They seem to be really great at targeting a person level across channels. So you can run a campaign to an audience as small as 1-5 people at a specific company using various targeting methods including email upload. Metadata can't get this granular.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • INFUSEmedia significantly increased our overall lead volume (ie able to produce 5000 leads/month when other channels were struggling to generate more then a few hundred) at far more efficient CPLs (Cost-Per-Lead)
  • Our clients have given positive feedback on lead quality and wrap reports that INFUSEmedia has provided to our team had provided further insight into the companies, job levels, etc. that our leads are tied to, further validating their quality and alignment with our desired targeting
Read full review
  • Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity
  • Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates
  • 90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30%
  • Saving us hundreds of hours over the course of the next year doing daily manual optimization and budget management tasks for us so we can focus on strategy and testing new things
Read full review
ScreenShots

INFUSE Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Metadata.io Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of