Intapp Conflicts vs. OpenText Documentum

Intapp is great for storing your conflicts database and files associated with matters. I find that its user interface is really friendly. I have yet to see an analyst that does not quickly learn how it functions. Going through files can be a little bit more onerous because the way they are listed and naming conventions can vary, but overall I find it a very helpful tool for running conflicts

Incentivized

Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.

Incentivized

• Allows for easy review of conflicts within the database
• Has a very friendly user interface
• Easy ability to communicate with downstream teams and local offices
• Customizable searches with search parameters (default settings)

Incentivized

• Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
• Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
• Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.

Incentivized

• Dark Mode option would make for a friendlier user experience
• Being able to paste outside information directly from copying (i.e., do not have to use a notepad to avoid formatting issues)
• An easily accessible user guide (one click access)

Incentivized

• WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
• EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.

Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.

Incentivized

Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.

Incentivized

I have only ever used Intapp in the law firm setting. My only other experience is using legal and research search engines, which do not fit within the realm of Intapp per se.

Incentivized

At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.

Incentivized

• It helps reduce risk to our firm
• It has allowed us to have the forms we use be interconnected, so we avoid wasting time on submission of separate forms
• The report we have now also allows Partners to review conflicts on their own even without us providing a summary (helpful for afterhours for the Partners)

Incentivized

• After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
• It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
• Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.

Incentivized