Intellect QMS vs. Teamcenter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Intellect QMS
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Intellect provides a flexible enterprise Quality Management Software (eQMS) solution and platform designed to meet any FDA and ISO compliance requirements, as well as digital transformation goals. Built on the Intellect Compliance Platform, Intellect's no-code platform, Intellect offers what they describe as the most configurable eQMS solution in the industry. Intellect's eQMS is a centralized and integrated solution to manage quality needs, today and tomorrow. The vendor boasts over 19…N/A
Teamcenter
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Teamcenter is a product lifecycle management system designed to help organizations integrate and standardize product development processes across functional silos.N/A
Pricing
Intellect QMSTeamcenter
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Intellect QMSTeamcenter
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsIntellect is available on a subscription basis, with pricing dependent on the number of users.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Intellect QMSTeamcenter
Considered Both Products
Intellect QMS
Chose Intellect QMS
We considered other "out of the box" platforms and decided to partner with Intellect QMS because of the ease of implementation and scalability. We went through a lot of demos and preferred the Intellect QMS user interface and responsiveness of the customer support team. The …
Chose Intellect QMS
No comparison with the huge improvement Intellect is compared to the software we were using in the past. Night and Day difference.
Chose Intellect QMS
None at this time. I found Intellect and knew it had the ability to fill my needs
Teamcenter
Chose Teamcenter
Teamcenter performs better compared to other two tools, due to it's efficiency with collaboration of multiple teams and acting as a central repository.
Chose Teamcenter
Earlier, some of the companies acquired by my organization were using PTC Windchill, but the overall stability, user experience and depth of functionality which are provided by Teamcenter doesn't match with any other PLM software and thus, all the acquired companies which were …
Chose Teamcenter
It has better version control, process lifecycle management, easy to understand workflow process. Great GUI and customizable by user.
Chose Teamcenter
I was using the SAP and Teamcenter integration, Teamcenter and SAP often reside in separate data silos within a company. Integration breaks down these barriers, enabling a single source of truth for product and manufacturing data. Information exchange between engineering …
Chose Teamcenter
Oracle PLM offers a comprehensive platform for product lifecycle management. Its strengths lie in integration with other Oracle solutions, providing a unified ecosystem. However, compared to competitors, its learning curve can be steep, impacting initial adoption. Yet, once …
Chose Teamcenter
Teamcenter is user-friendly, easily customizable, provides all information on one platform, and is light to use with any system.
Chose Teamcenter
6WIND Virtual Service Router VSR
Chose Teamcenter
Currently using Teamcenter Enterprise and data migration capabilities a major factor. Addition manufacturing requirements a factor against Windchill
Chose Teamcenter
It was superior in all aspects from cad to plm.
It offers greater usability and flexibility of usage with in the organisation.
Chose Teamcenter
Teamcenter has a unique way of collecting data that is different (Items) but works well once you have made the mental switch. Other systems are more object/relationship based.
Windchill is quite mature and within the areas it overlaps Teancenter is quite competent. Enovia …
Chose Teamcenter
Teamcenter provides robust capabilities for managing product data, including CAD files, documents, bills of materials (BOMs), specifications, and other related information. It offers version control, change management, and secure storage, ensuring that teams have access to the …
Chose Teamcenter
Teamcenter was selected almost 21 years ago in the manufacturing area and for almost 11 years the engineering area merged the PLM (Windchill) with Teamcenter due to its strength.
Chose Teamcenter
Much more modern than Enovia, it integrates better with a diverse range of software.
Chose Teamcenter
We did not evaluate other products.
Chose Teamcenter
Not worked with it intensively.
Best Alternatives
Intellect QMSTeamcenter
Small Businesses
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
monday dev
monday dev
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Arena PLM and QMS
Arena PLM and QMS
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.8 out of 10
Roadmunk
Roadmunk
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Intellect QMSTeamcenter
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Intellect QMSTeamcenter
Likelihood to Recommend
The QMS is well suited for standardizing the steps that go along with a process. The workflows and activity ownership makes it very easy to make sure that processes are completed according to the way the workflow is displayed. It becomes very simple to track down the stage at which a process is at. Processes are done in a linear orderly manner.
Read full review
Teamcenter is perfect for working in large-scale projects related to manufacturing and engineering where collaboration and management of data are crucial. It is evident where the complexity of the products is high such as in automobile and aerospace industries. Some of its features may seem too elaborate for the small business with a less complex process and therefore too expensive. It is less useful in organizations that do not have complex PLM needs or have less IT capacity to implement the system.
Read full review
Pros
  • The applications are linked to each other so that activities can be shared, collaborated and escalated in one platform.
  • Applications are sufficient "out of the box" but can be configured easily with its intuitive Design tools.
  • Users can go to their personal dashboard to stay on top of their tasks across multiple applications and monitor status of activities in progress.
  • The workflow-based applications keep activities moving forward efficiently but following standard processes.
Read full review
  • Data Management: your Parts divided into Item Types.
  • Data Management: You can easily add pseudo folders to segregate data inside. You don't have to look for anything now.
  • Change Management: Use the built-in or customize it. Now, you have workflows and can decide who is responsible for every task. It's done automatically.
  • Project Management - built-in MS Project, can manage tasks and still have a Gantt chart from it.
  • CAD integration - a lot of time saved when single source of true.
Read full review
Cons
  • Although the configuration is a "no code" approach, there is a learning curve to effecting design changes.
  • The user guide documentation provided is OK for administrators but needs to be more user-friendly for general users.
  • Importing "legacy" data from existing processes can be cumbersome.
Read full review
  • I'm going to be a little blunt here. So the way how MPP and bombs are getting separated out, that is creating some issues when we want to implement end-to-end processes. The bomb team, the manufacturing or the sector manager kind of team, tries to give various features for the materials and bombs related to them, but all of those features are not available for BOP. For example, solution variant creation. When we have a variant based structure, I can create a solution variant for bombs, but I cannot create a solution variant for BOPs and this is, I would say something of a gap that Siemens should address and get it fixed. We have to do customization, but if the product is itself giving us then this is an elegant way to push it further. This is what I would say is the issue.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Because of our current customer needs, we will most likely maintain use of Siemens PLM products for some time. Aside from the initial software cost, we pay for yearly maintenance. Maintaining our yearly maintenance licensing with Siemens, we receive access to all of the latest software releases, as well as premier technical support
Read full review
Usability
There is always resistance to change, but users are finding Intellect QMS to exceed their expectations as we migrate from our legacy "island" Sharepoint-based processes. Training is actually easiest to do hands-on, and users can learn quickly and then help train others. Users appreciate the personal navigation dashboard and the familiarity of the interface from one application to another. The workflow-driven applications are intuitive and make the system easy to navigate for all levels of users, although the learning curves will vary. The "Design-Test-Live" approach facilitates the implementation of configuration changes suggested by users.
Read full review
As previously mentioned, due to the intense amount of features and modules present in the software, the usability of the software suffers greatly. Many of the features are not used in our context, and many of the modules are not purchased, but the options are still present on the interface leading to a lot of clutter, much of which is never used. The interfaces suffer from a lack of design and tend to feel like a conglomerate of Windows 98 elements.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
In the time that we have used Teamcenter we have received a good response from the support team, they have great customer service, we have solved the problems that have arisen very quickly, and they are attentive and answer us if we have any questions.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Demo assembly
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We considered other "out of the box" platforms and decided to partner with Intellect QMS because of the ease of implementation and scalability. We went through a lot of demos and preferred the Intellect QMS user interface and responsiveness of the customer support team. The cost was competitive to launch and will allow us to add users and applications as we continue to grow. Many of the customer testimonials we reviewed pointed to Intellect QMS as the best fit for our organization.
Read full review
Earlier, some of the companies acquired by my organization were using PTC Windchill, but the overall stability, user experience and depth of functionality which are provided by Teamcenter doesn't match with any other PLM software and thus, all the acquired companies which were earlier using PTC Windchill has now slowly started into moving towards Teamcenter.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Teamcenter is easily on the best scalable solution. The single source of product information allows us to collaborate more effectively on the product lifecycle. Also, being a cloud solution, it is pretty straightforward to scale as the maintenance required is quite low . In addition, the overall cost is also easily manageable for businesses like ours.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Users appreciate the time and effort saved by having all of the QMS functions connected and in one place, without having to rely on emails, Sharepoint links multiple modes of communication to keep track of their activities and responsibilities.
  • The no-code platform means we don't need IT support to maintain and configure the applications. One administrator was able to get the system launched and effective in just several weeks, with ongoing training and customization as users and applications are added.
  • Our organization was recently certified to ISO 9001:2015. Intellect QMS helped us to navigate internal and audits confidently and effectively.
Read full review
  • We chose Teamcenter because of its cost-effectiveness, and we can say that it has lived up to our expectations because we have been able to save in other more expensive tools to do what we can do in this one. The ROI has been over 40% because we have integrated it across multiple teams and it has allowed us to reduce the amount of errors in our processes and create a more centralized environment.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Intellect QMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Custom dashboard, with real-time metrics to give users greater visibility, insights and monitoring.Screenshot of A No-Code Compliance Platform used to customize apps, or ti build new business apps to automate business processes.

Teamcenter Screenshots

Screenshot of Active Workspace, the User Interface (UI) to drive Teamcenter. With no install required, it is a visual UI to navigate through products and processes, with tooltips to guide users along the way.Screenshot of BOM configuration, in Teamcenter. With flexibility in how a BOM is managed and defined, it can provide an up-to-date source of information that eliminates the need for standalone spreadsheets and systems. Teamcenter X provides a flexible BOM management strategy that enables a single, accurate product definition for all who interact with the BOM.Screenshot of Teamcenter X search and analytics capabilities provides a streamlined product lifecycle management (PLM) search experience to help quickly find data. Teamcenter X visually presents search results in logical groups so users can drill down through product structures and relationships.Screenshot of Product design intent can be communicated, and product data visualized, in their entirety using 2D and 3D visualization and markup capabilities. The user can also visualize and interrogate Product Manufacturing Information (PMI).Screenshot of documents are managed in conjunction with product development, with integrated PDF for viewing and markup.