TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

WebStorm vs. Microsoft Visual Studio Code

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    WebStorm

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/AWebStorm is an integrated development environment (IDE) by JetBrains. Designed for JavaScript and TypeScript development, WebStorm also aims to make it easy to tackle the most challenging tasks. Whether resolving Git merge conflicts or renaming a symbol across multiple files, it takes just a few clicks.

    $0

    per year

    Microsoft Visual Studio Code

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft offers Visual Studio Code, a text editor that supports code editing, debugging, IntelliSense syntax highlighting, and other features.

    $0

    Pricing
    WebStormMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Editions & Modules
    Individual Non-Commercial
    $0
    per year
    Individual
    $6.90
    per month
    Bussiness
    $15.90
    per month per user
    Individual
    $69
    per year
    Business
    $159
    per year per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    WebStormMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    WebStormMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Considered Both Products
    JetBrains
    Chose WebStorm
    While vscode is a great product by itself, I prefer WebStorm as I found it more intuitive to use out of the box. I also feel error detection and linting is producing better results on WebStorm. Keeping an IDE with out-of-the-box keybinding and common plugins allows me …
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    The only other applications that I've used comparable to IntelliJ Webstorm have been Aptana Studio and Microsoft Visual Studio Code. Personally, I found Visual Studio Code too complicated. I never had the time to get around the learning curve of that IDE, since I'm so busy at …
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    VS Code is free and more popular. Popularity helps in that you can do pair programming more easily because you all use the same [tool]. It's also easier when trying to guide someone (especially a junior developer).
    However, Webstorm comes with more out-of-the-box and is …
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    Microsoft VS code has some similar features as WebStorm, but too basic and lack of a lot of "in-depth" features, it is not kind of "All-In-One" IDE officially speaking, so eventually we find out WebStorm meets our needs much better
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    I like WebStorm better because I don't have to spend time hunting down "useful plugins" to add to VS Code. But I'm biased because I have a lot more experience with WebStorm.
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    The only reason we sometimes use Sublime is that it manages to cover basic development needs while being to be very fast and light. WebStorm is heavier on resources, but you can't compare it with Sublime, because WebStorm is an IDE, and therefore it provides more features and …
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    IntelliJ WebStorm is a very smart workbench compared with other solutions available in the market, and it saves a lot of developers time in doing their tasks.
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    For Javascript projects, particularly Angular projects, WebStorm is superior to any other IDE I've used. WebStorm has been easier to pick up and learn straight out of the box. Visual Studio Code might be able to do some of the same things, but not without a lot more setup and …
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    I selected IntelliJ WebStorm mostly for legacy issues and I'm used/loyal to it. I guess if I started today, no strings attached I don't know if I'd be using it. It seems the main competitor is Visual Studio Code. Developers like it because it's fast and simple which is an area …
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    IntelliJ WebStorm in comparison with Visual Studio Code:
    • More features.
    • A richer set of refactoring capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    WebStorm offers full IDE features for web development that surpasses the best text editors, and I find it has better features than even VS Code still.
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    While Visual Studio is a great toll to develop our C# back-end application, we found that using this one to develop our front-end web application was not suitable.
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    Microsoft VS Code is extremely customizable with needs. So, features like syntax highlighting, bracket-matching, auto-indentation, well-integrated terminal, and side-by-side editing are powerful. Even these features are given free with Microsoft VS code. PyCharm and WebStorm …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    All the previously listed are incredible development environments that perfectly fulfill this function, but [Microsoft] Visual Studio Code goes one step ahead by providing flexibility, customization and adaptability to development environments with its own methodology, for all …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    [Microsoft] Visual Studio Code beats the competition due to its extensibility. Their robust extensions architecture combined with the plethora of mostly free extensions written by the community can't be beaten. The fact that this tool itself is provided by a world-recognized …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    When it comes to UI and light weightiness, Visual Code is the winner. But when it comes to Intelli-Sense and autosuggestion IntelliJ works better in my view.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    For our software dev teams, they still use the products from JetBrains (PhpStorm, RubyMine, etc) when they are laser-focused on one technology. For our less experienced, less code specific web dev team, Microsoft Visual Studio Code knocks it out of the park. I'd recommend …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    We had better luck with VS Code than Atom. We tried to like Atom pretty hard, but it just had some clunkiness and some unintuitive things that caused us to give up on it. Webstorm seems to be a much more capable competitor. The main pro of VS Code over Webstorm is that VS …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    I would say it's great since it's open-source and anyone who aspires to do app development can make use of all features provided by the Visual Studio Code.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    Overall, compared to all other open source text editors like Sublime Text, Vim, etc, I've noticed that the Visual Studio Code has been updated regularly which makes it work more efficiently and resolves any bugs on a continuous basis. I feel like VS Code has the speed like Subli…
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Visual Studio Code
    Visual Studio Code offers a better one-stop-shopping experience if you are multi-lingual. There are plugins for just about every language imaginable making it great if you want one experience in every language you write code in. You don't get that with WebStorm or even with the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    WebStormMicrosoft Visual Studio Code
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (30 ratings)
    8.6
    (90 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.4
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.6
    (7 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.4
    (8 ratings)
    9.7
    (23 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)