TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Freehand by InVision vs. Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Freehand by InVision

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AFreehand, from InVision headquartered in New York, is an online whiteboard that enables teams to plan, brainstorm, and draw together. It aims to give everyone a simple way to visually represent ideas with charts, diagrams, and drawings. Whether for mind mapping, creating a customer journey map, or drafting up an org chart, Freehand can help teams make ideas and plans visual.

    $4

    per month per user

    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AThe Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite empowers teams to ideate, plan, design, build, and launch game-changing solutions from a shared infinite canvas.

    $0

    per month

    Pricing
    Freehand by InVisionLucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Editions & Modules
    Freehand Free
    $0
    per year per user
    Freehand Pro
    $4
    per month per user
    Freehand Enterprise
    Custom Quote
    Free
    $0
    Individual
    $9
    per month per user
    Team
    $10
    per month per user (3 user minimum)
    Enterprise
    .
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Freehand by InVisionLucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Freehand by InVisionLucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Considered Both Products
    InVisionApp Inc.
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    I love it way better than all the other ones I tried.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    We use both InVision Freehand and Lucidchart for different purposes. Lucidchart is much better at handling complex data flows, etc but it's best suited when working alone. While InVision Freehand is a much better tool to collaborate with other team members in real-time. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    InVision and Lucid are approved for use. They are fairly comparable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    I really do like Miro and its features a lot but the fact that it doesn't integrate or live with the rest of our UX deliverables makes it challenging to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    For real-time collaboration and whiteboarding Comparable to Mural and Miro Better and more flexible than Figma For written documentation: Different features and more limited than Google Doc Similar to Notion in editing experience but more limited in features For creating …
    Incentivized
    Chose Freehand by InVision
    We use lots of other tools, but freehand has the easiest learning curve and the simplest UI, which I really appreciate. It makes it the most similar to a true whiteboarding session.
    Incentivized
    Lucid Software
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Freehand by InVisionLucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.9
    (102 ratings)
    8.7
    (1124 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (9 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    7.5
    (16 ratings)
    8.9
    (1093 ratings)
    Availability
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.3
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.4
    (6 ratings)
    7.3
    (877 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.5
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)