Iziago vs. Kyriba

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Iziago
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$12.99
per month
Kyriba
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Kyriba empowers CFOs, Treasurers and their IT counterparts to transform liquidity as a dynamic, real-time vehicle for growth and value creation. Kyriba is a secure, scalable SaaS platform that leverages artificial intelligence, automates payments workflows, and enables thousands of multinational corporations and banks to maximize growth, protect against loss from fraud and financial risk and reduce operational costs. Kyriba states that for…N/A
Pricing
IziagoKyriba
Editions & Modules
Basic
$12.99
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IziagoKyriba
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IziagoKyriba
Considered Both Products
Iziago

No answer on this topic

Kyriba
Chose Kyriba
Kyriba is a more user-friendly tool with a robust ecosystem of partner applications, banks, etc.
Chose Kyriba
Excel Database Tasks (EDT) and Microsoft Excel
Chose Kyriba
Treasura has not been invested in for product development for over a decade. It was ahead of its time back in 2010 but now it falls short of the user experience and sophistication / logic rules that Kyriba provides. Kyriba continues to invest in and develop its product to …
Chose Kyriba
Before going with Kyriba, we considered a number of products. However, the main reason we went with it was how easy it was to integrate it with bank statements. With other software, it isn't easy to implement. Kyriba is very easy to use and the system performance while using it …
Chose Kyriba
Cenveo evaluated multiple Treasury Management Systems; however, Kryiba was the only one that could provide us with the solution for our AP payments. Cenveo required the TMS to allow at least 2 levels of approval in selecting and paying vendors at the invoices level & clearing …
Chose Kyriba
The above are all examples of bank rec software, Kyriba was selected over its competitors after a comprehensive vetting process. Kyriba has served us well, covering the bank rec process efficiently as well as being a one-stop-shop for treasury and banking-related functions for …
Chose Kyriba
It is one of the amazing tools which gives a superb performance. the cash and liquidity management of this tool is very strong because all the modules of this product work super well in any company with all the banks all across the globe. Also, the function of reporting is very …
Chose Kyriba
C2treasury is a good product but with limited functionality, particularly in the connectivity space. They don't offer a concentrator solution that is cheap for fewer accounts. Reporting is also limited. Blackline is a different product but its Bank reconciliation is a little …
Chose Kyriba
Elire had a lot of options that we deemed unnecessary, and the cost was much more than that of Kyriba. Elire did have some options that were very intriguing to us that Kyriba cannot do, but the price differential combined with the complexity of Elire made us decide that Kyriba …
Chose Kyriba

In previous companies, the payments were processed from an AS400 based module, which required a deep technical knowledge for every action required, turning simple things like adding a bank account into a nightmare

With Kyriba, most of the processes and updates just requires a …

Chose Kyriba
As I stated, I was not a part of the process to select a TMS, but I do know that several were evaluated back in 2014 I believe. The final candidates were GTreasury and Kyriba. Kyriba was selected in large part to having the more dynamic capabilities for a global organization …
Chose Kyriba
Kyriba offers a more comprehensive and end to end workflow for a SaaS offering. It is structured around Cash management/visibility but has sufficient functionality for complementary functions to serve as a stand-alone system at a better cost than its competitors. It is more …
Chose Kyriba

SAP and Fintech were more than we needed, and priced accordingly.

IT2 was not very user friendly for our purposes.

It was a close race between GTreasury and Kyriba, but we went with Kyriba mainly due to the size of the company compared to GTreasury.

Chose Kyriba
I have not used another treasury management system (TMS). Kyriba is complementary to these modules.
Chose Kyriba
Kyriba is just a good as the other products available. It is easy to use and understand. However, they need to enhance their offering to show value above and beyond the other workstations. Since, we are a domestic company, Kyriba works well. If we had more advanced …
Chose Kyriba
I've outlined all the reasons previously. Cost, Experts in TMS with one line of business, large enough to have the resources to improve, but small enough to be nimble and quick with upgrades and changes after listening to the clients.
Chose Kyriba
Peoplesoft did not have implementers for treasury; SunGard was too expensive and Reval did not meet our functional requirements.
Chose Kyriba
One of the more attractive features of Kyriba as compared to Quantum was the knowledge that we would not need to test and install upgrades. We had a custom module in Quantum that eventually became incompatible with newer versions of the core product, so we were stuck on an …
Features
IziagoKyriba
Treasury Management
Comparison of Treasury Management features of Product A and Product B
Iziago
-
Ratings
Kyriba
7.4
Ratings
2% below category average
Cash and Liquidity Management00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Financial Fraud Prevention00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Treasury Management Payments00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Bank Account Management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Treasury Risk Management00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Treasury Reporting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Liquidity Forecasting00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Market Data00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
User Ratings
IziagoKyriba
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IziagoKyriba
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
This tool is a great solution and in spite of all the flaws, it has been rendering its services for the longest time. The platform is user-friendly and it just completely empowers your organization with a whole view over all types of cash positions that automatically provides an organization with the liberty to make a correct decision at any point in time. From my experience, I must say that this product has been delivering a highly secure enterprise platform.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Keeps our very large multi-bank account structure in balance daily, and gives daily visibility to all bank account balances for Treasury and the rest of Mercy
  • GL Mapping, creation and export of GL entries, and reconciliation of ALL GL entries back to the bank accounts.
  • Listens to client's suggestions and ideas, responds quickly with answers, regularly updates software based on our input. Also, they have a great Kyriba Social website where we can put in tickets for help and send in our ideas, but more importantly, share questions and ideas with the whole Kyriba client community, and provides FAQ from that dialogue for just about any question that we can think of. Great customer support and communication works well both directions.
  • Implementation process is well mapped out, but flexible to the client's needs. If I'm experienced and comfortable with TMS systems, I can do a lot more of the setup work instead of paying Kyriba to do it all, but if I need Kyriba to do it all, they will. Love the training process, which works a lot like college, where they teach you a section, give you homework to do before the next training session, check your accuracy and understanding, and move on to the next section. Almost all the Kyriba implementation folks I've worked with and met with were former Treasury practitioners, so they know what we know and they how to talk to us and with their developers to give us what we need.
  • Very high value for the low cost and scale-able depending on how many modules you need. Monthly fees are very reasonable, implementation fees are known up front, and you only pay for what you use, and annual volume based fees are reasonable as well. Much, much cheaper than bank fees for Information reporting, didn't require any MIS approval or assistance, and very easy to justify to upper management based on the massive labor savings.
  • One of the big reasons I love Kyriba so much is TMS is all they do and they have grown consistently in the 4 years we've been with them, and are very stable. I like that their whole focus is on providing the best TMS platform on the market, and not getting off track working on other non-TMS priorities and products. In the past, many TMS systems were owned by larger conglomerates, were bought and sold multiple times, and often times support and customer service was non-existent, and coworkers were leaving the firm left and right. Many went to Kyriba. That's the main reason I started looking and found Kyriba in the first place.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Some of the financial transaction cash flows do not integrate well with cash management and forecasting
  • Dashboards and Power BI are not readily available out of the box in the baseline product
  • Tracking of interest on bank accounts is not available in an automated fashion
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Very powerful treasury management tool, the reason it's not a 10 is implementation and support lags behind competitors. It can take a long time for issues to get resolved. But once it's set up properly, everything works well most of the time. Few if any other providers will have the same range of features.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It can always be better. There needs to be more instances wherein the user can make changes that work for them and those changes would be saved for future use, not having to make the same changes over and over again.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We have weekly calls with our support team to discuss ongoing implementation projects and other issues we find from time to time. They are very responsive to any questions we have and can escalate issues to a higher level of support if they do not have the expertise necessary to fix the problem. They are helpful in coordinating testing with banks if necessary, and provide regular statistics regarding support calls, causes of problems, and resolution.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
We had some issues with one of the implementation people provided by Kyriba. The communication skills were lacking, with assumptions being made as to what we knew already. It was very frustrating. Once that was resolved, further module implementations have been smoother.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
The above are all examples of bank rec software, Kyriba was selected over its competitors after a comprehensive vetting process. Kyriba has served us well, covering the bank rec process efficiently as well as being a one-stop-shop for treasury and banking-related functions for our group of companies.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Kyriba saves our department time, which is the most valuable thing we have. Before Kyriba we had to log into each bank to pull data for the prior day before we could enter our current day activity. Now the banks send the data right to Kyriba! It saves us about 3 hours of work each day from our old process.
  • Kyriba has given us visibility into all of our bank accounts in a centralized platform. We can better monitor activity and use that information to make better business decisions.
  • Kyriba has given us better transparency because of dual approval. One person has to enter information and another person has to approve information, so we have tighter controls.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kyriba Screenshots

Screenshot of the Liquidity Analytics Dashboard in Kyriba, which offers a real-time and actionable overview of an organization's liquidity position and related metrics, helping treasury professionals make informed decisions and ensure optimal cash management strategies.Screenshot of the Cash Analytics Dashboard in Kyriba, that presents crucial financial information that enable finance teams to answer questions like, Do I have enough cash? Are my cash forecasts reliable? What is my activity with banks?Screenshot of the Payments Analytics Dashboard in Kyriba, that gives users an at-a-glance overview of their organization's payment activities, ensuring efficient payment processing, compliance with approval workflows, and effective management of financial transactions.Screenshot of the Compliance Analytics Dashboard in Kyriba, that helps users monitor and manage fraud risks, ensure compliance with regulations, and respond to potential incidents, thereby safeguarding the organization's financial integrity and reputation.Screenshot of the Risk Analytics Dashboard in Kyriba, which helps to manage financial risk by answering questions like, How much is available on my credit lines? What is my borrowing profile? What is the value of my financial assets?Screenshot of the Supply Chain Finance Analytics Dashboard in Kyriba, that helps users manage and optimize their organization's working capital position, improve the cash conversion cycle, and make informed supply chain financing decisions to achieve financial efficiency.