JAGGAER vs. Tipalti

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JAGGAER
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
JAGGAER is a procure-to-pay provider in the higher education and government sectors. JAGGAER eProcurement and strategic sourcing customers gain access to suppliers on a scalable, customizable platform. The JAGGAER SaaS-based, source-to-settle solution provides unparalleled visibility, insights and recommendations to procurement leaders and suppliers. The result is a fluid supply chain driven by spend analysis, contract management, and an accounts payable solutions.N/A
Tipalti
Score 8.7 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Tipalti automates critical financial processes to drive efficiency, including accounts payable, mass payments, procurement, and expenses, all on one global finance automation platform that grows with the organization, automating, de-risking and simplifying finance.N/A
Pricing
JAGGAERTipalti
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JAGGAERTipalti
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsPricing starts at $149 per month for the platform fee. Users can upgrade to Tipalti's more advanced capabilities as their businesses gets more complex. The Tipalti pricing model is designed to grow with the user's company. Advanced features such as W-8 tax forms, international tax IDs, or multi-entity payables are available as needed.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JAGGAERTipalti
Considered Both Products
JAGGAER
Chose JAGGAER
Currently integrating SAP Concur although it's very new to us so I cannot speak much on it. Initial thoughts is that the user setup concept is similar but I don't have much else outside of that.
Chose JAGGAER
JAGGAER seems more intuitive and more robust for users
Chose JAGGAER
The SciQuest bid system is new and integrating it would be difficult since we have quite a lot of historical bid information that SciQuest cannot obtain from IonWave.
Chose JAGGAER
Although the base costs for Oracle were cheaper, by the time you added in all the additional charges for oracle, it ended up being significantly more expensive. In addition, we felt the SciQuest product was better suited our needs. It was geared more towards a science/research …
Chose JAGGAER
SciQuest is an easier solution for our users to navigate and use
Chose JAGGAER
Again, our SciQuest system integrates with Banner. Banner does have a way to create, approve and report on POs. However, the SciQuest product is so much more user friendly, so the learning curve is very steep. Also, SciQuest gives us a lot more detail in our reporting and PO …
Chose JAGGAER
Product functionality and ease of use was better than others.
Chose JAGGAER
We conducted a one year RFP. No one, not even Aribi, was able to do what SciQuest could do in the higher educational space. Granted that was seven years ago, but in my opinion no one could touch them.
Chose JAGGAER
Have not used any other online ordering system besides SciQuest
Chose JAGGAER
PeopleSoft eprocurement 9; it is much more complicated than SciQuest.
Chose JAGGAER
SciQuest has a better model for how they work with the suppliers themselves. Other groups use a model where suppliers have to pay in order to be included in the list of suppliers that they support.
Chose JAGGAER
Never used another online procurement solution in my other jobs. I of course purchase things online with amazon etc.
Chose JAGGAER
Better enforcement of state contracts. Sciquest also has good form builder functionality
Chose JAGGAER
I have only used SciQuest, i cannot compare it to the others you have listed. I do know that SciQuest works very well in a large or small company setting.
Chose JAGGAER
better tech support from SQ. easier user interface with SQ
Chose JAGGAER
As a supplier, SciQuest is selected by our customers - we are always confident when this selection is made.
One appreciates working together with SciQuest when considering some of the issues we've encountered with other marketplace/procurement solutions:
- Uneven support from …
Tipalti
Chose Tipalti
They are very similar. I do like how Divvy and Bill offer great credit card solutions. But when it comes down to automating the accounts payable function within your organization it is very similar and both offer a great product with similar pros and cons. Overall Tipalti is a …
Chose Tipalti
Concur was a miserable experience on the payables automation side for us. In my opinion, the implementation team did a poor job. Data sync into NetSuite was not real time. To me, the interfaces were archaic. Tipalti was such a breath of fresh air. I love working with their …
Chose Tipalti
Both of these products have treated us well and have their pros and cons. We do a lot of acquisitions though and they are just not friendly the more and more you go. Tipalti has been very helpful with the more we grow. Its a key part in integrating finances
Chose Tipalti
The price point and all-inclusive pricing was very clear with Tipalti. The others separated the payment platform from the invoicing platform, which didn't make sense at all. With one provider, it would be implemented after the payables side, which was not helpful for our …
Chose Tipalti
Tipalti offers more payment method capabilities that fit our partners needs (Paypal, Hold my Payments)
Chose Tipalti
We selected Tipalti because it was a clear and simple option without the complexity or high price tag of other ERP or accounting systems. It was a fit for purpose solution that handled the exact accounts payable needs that we had. It was easy to implement and start using right …
Chose Tipalti
BILL, Payoneer and Stripe Billing
Chose Tipalti
Better OCR, which is crucial: the ability to work from your email inbox without having to log in elsewhere.
Chose Tipalti
The AP element of Tipalti was in place when I started, so I was not involved in the selection of the tool.
Chose Tipalti
Tipalti's system is much easier to manipulate, it felt like you needed an advanced degree to utilize Concur effectively.
Chose Tipalti
Coupa was significantly more expensive, takes longer to implement and seemed to be more than we needed. AvidXchange was more similar to Tipalti, but Tipalti sales team seemed hungrier for our business.
Chose Tipalti
AvidXchange worked well as it integrates as a Suite App within NetSuite; however, it still required payments to go out through NetSuite or through a bank directly. It has been a while since I used it so maybe that has improved but having Tipalti handle everything from …
Chose Tipalti
On my second time selecting, I was not going to consider any other vendors. My bank had some arrangement with MineralTree so I was obligated to go through their process. Ultimately it came back to Tipalti's payment processing capabilities as the standout feature.
Chose Tipalti
From initial implementation through to user experience, Tipalti has been able to exceed our expectations in terms of its functionality and useability. We have found with other systems implemented in the past they did not match our expectations which resulted in us terminating …
Chose Tipalti
Tipalti was in fact the only solution that met all our critical requirements (e2e) and supported ISK payments. Credit cards is not an available functionality outside the US, but wasn´t a critical feature for us.
Chose Tipalti
Although I did not partake in selecting Tipalti, I will say because of my Ariba experience, Tipalti is far more end user friendly. In my experience, Ariba can be super complicated and for those that used it at my last company, they were very unhappy with it's complex environment
Chose Tipalti
If I hadn't used Tipalti, I would have had to rely on traditional banks that don't offer the level of support that Tipalti offers.

Their integration team gave us all the tools and time we needed to complete our integration.
Chose Tipalti
With Tipalti the vendor can choose between more payment options + can change between payment details/methods at any time without the need to have the payer doing so.
Chose Tipalti
They support many more countries and allow us to use the platform in ALL our global payment
Chose Tipalti
Good Customer service and compatible fee.
Chose Tipalti
Previously, our Company housed all invoices and approvals in NetSuite. This was a very clunky process which often resulted in duplicated work. Approvals were obtained through email and attached as a file to invoice records in NetSuite. Whereas, in Tipalti, you can view the …
Chose Tipalti
Tipalti can handle larger volume than Bills.com
Chose Tipalti
SAP Concur did not have consistent invoice entry. Depending on who at SAP Concur entered your invoice, the vendor could be incorrect, the vendor number could be missing a digit, the amount of the invoice entered wrong, etc. We had too many issues with SAP Concur because they …
Features
JAGGAERTipalti
Payment Management
Comparison of Payment Management features of Product A and Product B
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Tipalti
9.0
Ratings
19% above category average
Customizable Approval Policies00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Financial Document Management00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Payment Status Tracking00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Payment Audit Trail00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Duplicate Bill Detection00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Advanced OCR00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Electronic Funds Transfer00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Accounts Payable
Comparison of Accounts Payable features of Product A and Product B
JAGGAER
-
Ratings
Tipalti
8.2
Ratings
21% above category average
Automated Accounts Payable Processes00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Vendor Management00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Tax Form Preparation00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JAGGAERTipalti
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Precoro
Precoro
Score 2.8 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
Webexpenses
Webexpenses
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JAGGAERTipalti
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.4
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.9
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.4
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
JAGGAERTipalti
Likelihood to Recommend
The SciQuest application helps guide users toward preferred suppliers. The efficiencies experienced in both sending out orders to suppliers as well as bringing back invoices helps our users maintain their inventories as well as allowing them to better understand the condition of their budgets and spend because of the quick turnaround
Read full review
The invoice processing element is far, far easier than manually inputting invoices are we were doing previously. The OCR is not perfect, but having it scanned in and ready for review saves a lot of time. The approvals process is fast and effective, and approvers can approve directly from the email without having even to log into the system. The audit trail function allows the finance team to see exactly who has done what to each invoice, and when. Payments, however, are where we see the most benefit. Vendor bank details are stored securely and controls can be put in place to ensure that any changes to vendor data must be approved. Once fully approved, invoices can be scheduled for payment either on a particular date or on the invoice due date, which ensures vendors are paid on a 'Just In Time' basis. All invoices and payments sync seamlessly to our ERP each day.
Read full review
Pros
  • The workflow works great for routing requisitions to the appropriate approvers. It's also very customizable to adapt workflow to fit our current policies.
  • SciQuest pushes requisitions straight into our ERP, eliminating the need for duplicate data entry.
  • Punchouts are a great time saver for our end users to compare pricing within the same system.
Read full review
  • Support is phenomenal! Incredibly responsive, always have the answers, super knowledgeable and will assist in bringing resolution to various concerns, as well, providing not just support, but education as well!
  • System is almost always working efficiently, very few incidents that slow me down.
  • System is incredibly user friendly. I was able to learn it pretty quickly.
Read full review
Cons
  • The UI is pretty dry form a user point of view (I've heard this many times by end users over the years)
  • Documents look the same for the most part (for invoices, reqs and POs)
  • Possibly some updates other types of data exports
Read full review
  • In the PO matching queue, there is some clunkiness surrounding updating PO lines. For example, if you need to delete PO lines picked up from the invoice, you currently have to delete each line individually, instead of being able to select multiple and delete.
  • Sometimes PO numbers do not properly pick up from the OCR system. For example, the OCR might pick up "PO 18535" instead of "18535". This causes the AP team to have to manually link the PO, creating an extra step.
  • For PO-backed Invoices that require you to manually type in the PO amount, there is no option to save your inputs. If there are any changes to the match details (i.e. linking another PO, or unlinking a PO) all inputs are reset to blank.
  • If there are non PO line items for an invoice that is in the PO matching queue, there is no option to select a separate department code for that line item.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Well, I put it in the middle because I hope someday we will get a chance to put eProcurement suite of needed products out for RFP one day. It will not happen anytime soon due to the current administration. But I'm hopeful, and if and when it happens, SciQuest no doubt will be a strong contender.
Read full review
Solid system performance. Suits our needs and solution provider very inclined to accept feedback and involve users in developing the solution to serve both the provider and the ultimate user. Tipalti has streamlined our process that was previously very manual and prone to error. Now there is transparency of information and role.
Read full review
Usability
There is a 3 month learning curve and then the features are easy to use. My AP team processes 400 invoices daily through the system. The things to watch for are vendor billing mistakes (no/incorrect PO number, information discrepancies) and buyer purchase request inconsistencies. Those are part of AP anyway so maybe it is what it is. The Sciquest AP software performs as designed some improvements needed. In our system I have documented a list of 60 improvements that could increase throughput up to 50%. Those improvements include making the AP records GUI format more customized for AP purposes, and improving the QC tolerance functionality, which can be laborious to sync (Match).
Read full review
The system is incredibly easy to use, with most tasks being completed in a small number of clicks. The user interface is very user intuitive and can be navigated very easily. Multiple payments can be made instantaneously and as the vendors manage their payable account we are able to ensure that payments are being sent to the right account. The advanced functionality for duplicate invoices ensures that we are not processing bills twice and we have found that in 100% of cases it has identified a duplicate bill.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
They have had only a couple of very quick occasions where they were down for 1-2 minutes. One time they had a problem adding attachments. Very Reliable!
Read full review
Tipalti has always been responsive to our questions and concerns.
Read full review
Performance
Having used SciQuest for over five years and having their competitors, SciQuest offers the best user experience and integration between vendors and ERP.
Read full review
No issues here. Generally has been pretty fast.
Read full review
Support Rating
24/7 support. Never send you to India or some foreign country support line. Always get an answer, even if it's an answer you did not want. Always well formed conclusions/solutions to problems. They genuinely seem to care about the service they provide
Read full review
Since I also work in customer support, I often have to contact Tipalti's team with questions from our users. Tipalti's support team has always been exceptionally helpful and it was a pleasure to communicate with them. I have always received prompt responses to any inquiries and they are excellent at solving our customers' issues within a short time
Read full review
Online Training
SciQuest has changed its name to Jaggaer.https://www.jaggaer.com/
Read full review
Tipalti provides great How to online guide
Read full review
Implementation Rating
We had an internal project manager who was well versed in PMI methodologies. I think the implementation would have gone far less successfully, or may even have failed entirely, without her. She was able to do all the things a project manager is supposed to do, and in an ordered and organized manner.
Read full review
Implementation went smooth as we used and tested everything in the sandbox first
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
As a supplier, SciQuest is selected by our customers - we are always confident when this selection is made. One appreciates working together with SciQuest when considering some of the issues we've encountered with other marketplace/procurement solutions: - Uneven support from staff who were less than fully trained - Non-adherence to standards such as cXML despite claims to be compliant - Difficulty garnering project resources necessary to complete an implementation - Outdated and error-prone catalog management portals
Read full review
Both of these products have treated us well and have their pros and cons. We do a lot of acquisitions though and they are just not friendly the more and more you go. Tipalti has been very helpful with the more we grow. Its a key part in integrating finances
Read full review
Scalability
Highly reliable remotely hosted PTP solution that interfaces with our remote OCR vendor and with university sited operational servers. Twice a year over the last 3 years a SciQuest/OCR system file handling or network problem occurs that gets fixed within a day.
Read full review
We were given the option of only one integration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Customers seem to be fine with selecting requisition items and having them pushed back via carts to a legacy system.
  • Converting one's legacy ERP system to a SaaS solution may prove to be too much of an overhaul in regards to converting to a new set of rules which do not fit exactly with current business processes. The inability to enhance in great detail is also a drawback for customers coming from a highly modifiable system.
Read full review
  • in my Corporate Controller capacity, I have total visibility of all invoices within the organization
  • total staff time spent on the AP process will decrease easily 75% or more
  • I have a small staff. Even during PTO of my staff member, I can do necessary AP items, start to finish, in minutes, 100% remotely
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tipalti Screenshots

Screenshot of Intelligent invoicing workflowScreenshot of Mobile approvals for invoices and paymentsScreenshot of Brandable self-service supplier portal (including handling tax forms)Screenshot of Brandable self-service portal to collect and validate payment detailsScreenshot of Combined payment methods, currencies, and entities in a single payment fileScreenshot of an early payment, which can be offered to suppliers through email or the supplier portal