Jamf Protect vs. SentinelOne Singularity

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jamf Protect
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Developed exclusively for macOS, Jamf Protect provides a solution to maintain endpoint compliance, monitor for, respond to, and remediate security incidents on macOS with minimal impact to the device and end-user experience. Jamf Protect detects Mac-specific threats, and prevents known malware from running on devices and quarantines them for later analysis. Jamf Protect forwards data to a system of record to ensure a security posture, fleetwide, stays compliant by monitoring security settings on…N/A
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
SentinelOne is endpoint security software, from the company of the same name with offices in North America and Israel, presenting a combined antivirus and EDR solution.
$4
per agent, per month
Pricing
Jamf ProtectSentinelOne Singularity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Singularity Ranger IoT
$4
per agent, per month
Singularity Core
$6
per agent, per month
Singularity Control
$8
per agent, per month
Singularity Complete
$12
per agent, per month
Singularity Cloud
$36
per VM/Kubernetes worker node, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jamf ProtectSentinelOne Singularity
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jamf ProtectSentinelOne Singularity
Considered Both Products
Jamf Protect
Chose Jamf Protect
I find that all of the products have the same features; however, Jamf Protect is stronger if managing macOS devices. Also, it is one license so what you pay covers all of the features and does not require additional licenses for features like USB device control. The CIS …
Chose Jamf Protect
Sophos was our main endpoint for all our windows and macOS devices. However with the newer releases of macOS Sophos started to become more problematic to deploy. Moving over to Jamf protect was the obvious choice and cost wise a lot more beneficial for us. It's monitoring and …
Chose Jamf Protect
ESET was a massive resource hog and more often than not blocked legitimate things like creative cloud products. Admin interface was a nightmare to navigate and clunky to use. Delays in getting a stable product that worked on silicon and for new OS was an other major factor in …
Chose Jamf Protect
In some aspects, Jamf Protect was far superior to the others mentioned above. The only downside I can see is that it is only macOS which could be a problem for hybrid environments.
Chose Jamf Protect
Jamf Protect is much lighter on system usage. It also has exclusive access to the threat protection baked into macOS. This lets Jamf Protect leverage the great work Apple is doing, and gives admins a way to extend that as well as view reports.

Webroot was often missing things …
SentinelOne Singularity
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity is also a very good product.Crowdstrike is also a leading company in EDR point of view and provide wide range of services and product.But because of last incident happen crowdstrike customer are bit hesitate going with crowdstrike.And SentinelOne …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Recommendation of an outside consultant.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
It’s very easy to deploy from our rmm and delivers fast responses to issues
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Microsoft was cheaper, but way more difficult to get setup and deployed and to manage. VMWare carbon black got purchased by broadsoft, so I doged a bullet there.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
VMware Carbon Black EDR
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity is a far superior product to Symantec Endpoint Security, which is the product we migrated from, when we purchased SentinelOne. Symantec simply missed security incidents it should have been able to catch, and support has recently changed for the worse. …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
In the distant past we had used iSensor through Dell. I can't say much about iSensor because we never really had it show any incidents or activity or reports. It might be better these days but from what I can tell, SentinelOne is the Gold Standard currently.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
There is no question, although they all have pro's and cons, SentinelOne is far superior
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne and Microsoft Defender are both best of industry EDR solutions. We employ both in out environment in tandem to provided complete coverage of systems and protection against all emerging cyber threats.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Webroot is a great product but did not provide the versatility that we really were desiring. It allowed to us to centrally manage, but required policy-based management, and not the endpoint detail we wanted. SentinelOne's central management provides a variety of options for …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne is definitely next-gen endpoint protection which makes it better than Symantec or Trend in that category. It prevents attacks and installs, allows you to monitor and update on the fly and works well overall. Also it is not as bulky as other products so you don't get …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne had all of the major features that we were looking for. The other products either required too much administrative attention or were lacking key features. For example, one could be uninstalled by the end user. We required that the installation be password …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Compared to the competition there really is no comparison. While there are many far better known endpoint protection products that have been around many years longer, SentinelOne puts them all to shame. It is the most solid endpoint/anti-virus product that I have used in over …
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
There are in my opinion products with the characteristics that can be [compared] to SentinelOne.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne has provided us better protection than other products we used in the past. We have also seen less impact on the system performance.
Chose SentinelOne Singularity
Only reason for choosing SentinelOne Singularity over crowdstrike was the cost because SentinelOne Singularity was much cheaper at that time as compared to the crowdstrike. Also, SentinelOne Singularity rating in gartner was higher than the crowdstrike which also gave it an …
Features
Jamf ProtectSentinelOne Singularity
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Jamf Protect
8.7
Ratings
2% above category average
SentinelOne Singularity
8.9
Ratings
4% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology8.90 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)8.90 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Centralized Management8.50 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Infection Remediation8.90 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Vulnerability Management8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Malware Detection8.90 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jamf ProtectSentinelOne Singularity
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Jamf ProtectSentinelOne Singularity
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Jamf ProtectSentinelOne Singularity
Likelihood to Recommend
The main reason we went with Jamf Protect was because we wanted a dedicated macOS security endpoint. Is was easy to implement and migrate over from our previous endpoint provider. As a university we have lab macOS devices that multiple users use. So we have Jamf Protect profiles that block the use of external drives and other other profiles that allow it. We different user accounts requiring different access this can get a bit messy when deploying the config profiles at login for each user that signs in.
Read full review
It works extremely well for investigating the root cause analysis of events because you can see so much detail into what was happening before, after, and around the detective incident. A weak point would be when the AI gets a little over-aggressive or doesn’t quite understand the use case for specific tools. Our RMM tool was detected as a pup.
Read full review
Pros
  • Security--it scans processes for 'bad stuff'
  • Notifies admins of any issues or potential issues; entirely customizable and we create many custom notifications and groups.
  • Integrates with Jamf Pro
  • Monitor CIS benchmarks via a clean and nice looking dashboard
Read full review
  • SentinelOne provides excellent protection against known and unknown attacks to our endpoints.
  • The recovery option provides a fast, first line of defense against ransomware and other system damaging attacks.
  • SentinelOne requires minimal administrative support making it a very cost effective and efficient solution.
Read full review
Cons
  • We also have JAMF Safe internet for iPads. I would love to see this same simple idea in Jamf Protect for the iMacs
Read full review
  • Possibly for compatibility with legacy Windows OS's and non Windows OS's.
  • Some settings are greyed out and unable to change but I believe this is to protect you from making a bad configuration change.
  • Could do better with reporting at the base level subscription.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Reliable for simple installation and above all efficient
Read full review
Usability
Jamf Protect is easy to manage. It is a separate interface from Jamf MDM which is nice for Security Operations teams. It allows Security teams to manage only the Security aspects without having to dig through all of the MDM configurations. For exception uses cases, Jamf Protect does provide options to customize settings where needed.
Read full review
There are some minor issues with the platform that can be mildly frustrating, but the overall performance, peace of mind, and ROI make it worth using. The management console is intuitive and easy to learn, the endpoint clients are simple but give IT professionals enough data to make management easy and simple
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Their support is good and quick to respond. The one issue we faced was when a non-protection issue arose there was a lot of dancing around trying to figure things out. This was frustrating as it took significantly longer to figure out issues. Lots of repetitive log gathers, screen caps, uninstalls that never seemed to resolve issues. Eventually, the product would be updated and the issue seemed to be resolved, but seemed to be the only solution.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I find that all of the products have the same features; however, Jamf Protect is stronger if managing macOS devices. Also, it is one license so what you pay covers all of the features and does not require additional licenses for features like USB device control. The CIS compliance aspects generally look better in in Jamf as compared to Crowdstrike.
Read full review
In the distant past we had used iSensor through Dell. I can't say much about iSensor because we never really had it show any incidents or activity or reports. It might be better these days but from what I can tell, SentinelOne is the Gold Standard currently.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Better detection of malware reducing downtime and risk to network
  • Easy to implement
  • Can be a bit of a steep learning curve in general
Read full review
  • SentinelOne has already proved its value by stopping attacks that would have gone otherwise unnoticed until much later in their infection process.
  • The Vigilance team has provided quick response to threats that were not easily contained via the automated response SentinelOne's agents provide. This has given us a significant piece of mind.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SentinelOne Singularity Screenshots

Screenshot of SentinelOne