| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Control-M | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | Control-M from BMC is a platform for integrating, automating, and orchestrating application and data workflows in production across complex hybrid technology ecosystems. It provides deep operational capabilities, delivering speed, scale, security, and governance. | $29,000 per year |
 JAMS | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | JAMS is a centralized workload automation and job scheduling solution that runs, monitors, and manages jobs and workflows. Reliably orchestrate the critical IT processes that run your business from a single pane of glass. | N/A |
| Control-M | JAMS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Control-M | JAMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | | Chose JAMS We used to have Control-M but replaced it with JAMS for better features and cost. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose JAMS For us, JAMS has a great balance of price and functionality. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Control-M | JAMS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workload Automation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Control-M | JAMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.6 | 9.1 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| Availability | 8.9 | 9.0 |
| Performance | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.3 | 8.5 |
| In-Person Training | 9.6 | - |
| Online Training | 9.2 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Configurability | 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 9.2 | 6.4 |
| Ease of integration | 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Product Scalability | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Professional Services | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.4 | 9.1 |
