| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 JAMS | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | JAMS is a centralized workload automation and job scheduling solution that runs, monitors, and manages jobs and workflows. Reliably orchestrate the critical IT processes that run your business from a single pane of glass. | N/A |
 Ansible | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it. | $5,000 per year |
| JAMS | Ansible | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| JAMS | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose JAMS While VisualCron provided more guardrails and user centric GUI, JAMS had a better resiliency functions with their clustering and service polling and failovers. We tested this and were able to maintain a large library of jobs and data the seamlessly switches between data … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| JAMS | Ansible | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workload Automation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Configuration Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| JAMS | Ansible | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.4 | 9.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | 8.0 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 7.3 |
| Availability | 9.0 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | 8.7 |
| Support Rating | 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Configurability | 8.1 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 6.4 | - |
| Ease of integration | 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Product Scalability | 8.7 | - |
| Professional Services | 9.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.1 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.1 | - |
