TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Jenkins

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AJenkins is an open source automation server. Jenkins provides hundreds of plugins to support building, deploying and automating any project. As an extensible automation server, Jenkins can be used as a simple CI server or turned into a continuous delivery hub for any project.N/A
    Pricing
    Jenkins
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Jenkins
    Free Trial
    No
    Free/Freemium Version
    Yes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Jenkins
    Considered Both Products
    Open Source
    Chose Jenkins
    Jenkins is highly customizable, making it ideal for complex pipelines that require scripting, conditional logic, and integration with a variety of tools.Jenkins offers thousands of plugins, giving it unmatched versatility.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Jenkins is highly customizable and flexible, supporting a wide range of plugins and integrations. Jenkins works with any version control system (Git, Subversion, etc.). Jenkins has a more mature ecosystem, and it may be better for large-scale, complex environments, especially …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    One of the most important factors for selecting Jenkins would be the cost. Since Jenkins is opensource, there is a good amount saved from licensing and software procurement costs. Apart from cost, Jenkins is easy to understand and there is wide range of documentation and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Bitbucket building was very slow, in order to improve that you have to upgrade to spend double or more minutes per build minute. The GUI was also very slow in updating on the progress of the builds, making things rather confusing. GitLab worked a bit better in my opinion, but …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Jenkins is very easy to use, open source tool. Its better for simple build and deployments.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    GitLab CI and GitHub Actions are other powerful options in the market also with a rising popularity and high interoperability with their respective platform.
    But Jenkins is still a good option for complex pipelines that require scripting and logic. Also, Jenkins uses as runtime …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    I have used Spinnaker as a CD tool. Though it's a very powerful CD tool we still needed Jenkins for CI, so to save some hassle for us we opt Jenkins solely.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Nomad used for deployment with Jenkins build server.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Didn't really check other tools in detail since Jenkins served all our requirements and has been hugely popular.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Overall, Jenkins is the easiest platform for someone who has no experience to come in and use effectively. We can get a junior engineer into Jenkins, give them access, and point them in the right direction with minimal hand-holding. The competing products I have used (TravisCI/G…
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Honestly, we use Jenkins for pretty much everything exclusively, so it's hard to compare.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    It's mostly stable and well-known within the DevOps community.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    We have not evaluated other similar products.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Both Jenkins and TeamCity do a good job of automating CI/CD. Jenkins runs much leaner than TeamCity - it only needs about a Gig of free memory, whereas TeamCity needs a fat 4 Gig free. Many tasks in Jenkins yml config can be very cumbersome, especially running local and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Jenkins is the only solution that we've tried that just automatically generates builds.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Jenkins is easy to set up and supports a wide range of plugins. So any type of deployment is very easy. We can easily deploy Node, Angular, React, Java, Python, etc. Projects. We can also provide different credentials to different employees. So easy to track what is done by …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Team services, while very similar, did not really have that much more added features for the much higher price tag. The team has moved over to the subscription-based Visual Studio so we may be reevaluating this solution as now it is part of our subscription and no longer an …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    I don't have any experience with alternatives to Jenkins.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    Originally Jenkins was selected because it was the best around, but it has since been outclassed by more specific services or cloud-based services and tools that will do all of the heavy lifting for you. Jenkins still has a use case - but it's hard to argue the additional …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    The big difference between Jenkins and other alternative tools is that Jenkins is open source and it’s free. Jenkins is very much about simple functionality. It’s a general CI tool that offers basic automation. It’s the most common CI tool on the market with a large community …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    We went with drone.io ultimately for its first class support for container based workloads.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jenkins
    We considered using Gitlab, but after some comparing, we found Jenkins was better in every way!
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Jenkins
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.5
    (72 ratings)
    Usability
    7.9
    (6 ratings)
    Performance
    8.9
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.6
    (6 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.0
    (1 ratings)