TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

JetBrains Rider vs. SonarQube Server

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Rider

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/AJetBrains supports .NET development with Rider, a .NET IDE based on the IntelliJ platform and ReSharper.

    $14.90

    per month per user

    SonarQube Server

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/ASonarQube is a code quality and vulnerability solution for development teams that integrates with CI/CD pipelines to ensure the software you produce is secure, reliable, and maintainable.

    $0

    per year per installation

    Pricing
    RiderSonarQube Server
    Editions & Modules
    For Individuals
    $149
    per year per user
    dotUltimate for Individual
    $169
    per year per user
    All Products Pack for Individuals
    $289
    per year per user
    For Organizations
    $419
    per year per user
    dotUltimate for Organizations
    $469
    per year per user
    All Products Pack for Organizations
    $779
    per year per user
    Community
    Free
    Developer EDITION
    starting at $720
    per year per installation
    Enterprise EDITION
    Contact sales for pricing
    per year per installation
    Data Center EDITION
    Contact sales for pricing
    per year per installation
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    RiderSonarQube Server
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsdotUltimate: All .NET tools, ReSharper C++ and JetBrains Rider, together in one pack—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    RiderSonarQube Server
    Considered Both Products
    JetBrains
    No answer on this topic
    Sonar
    Chose SonarQube Server
    Visual Studio has some nice code analysis tools, most which can be activated at development time.
    But they have some shortcomings and using an external tool allows catching issues that were not seen during development.
    Using this dual approach makes for a more robust application …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    RiderSonarQube Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    8.9
    (35 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.5
    (3 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)