JFrog Artifactory vs. ProGet

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JFrog Artifactory
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
JFrog Artifactory is a software repository management solution for enterprises available on-premise or from the cloud, presented as a single solution for housing and managing all the artifacts, binaries, packages, files, containers, and components for use throughout the software supply chain. JFrog Artifactory serves as a central hub for DevOps, integrating with tools and processes to improve automation, increase integrity, and incorporate best practices along the way.
$150
per month unlimited users
ProGet
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
inedo offers ProGet, a software repository and package management solution.N/A
Pricing
JFrog ArtifactoryProGet
Editions & Modules
Pro
$150
per month unlimited users
Enterprise X
$950
per month unlimited users
Pro X
$27,000
per year
Enterprise X
$48,000
per year
Enterprise +
Custom Pricing
Enterprise +
Contact Us
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JFrog ArtifactoryProGet
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JFrog ArtifactoryProGet
Considered Both Products
JFrog Artifactory
Chose JFrog Artifactory
  • Strong services expertise
  • Strong customer focus
  • Product functionality and performance
Chose JFrog Artifactory
JFrog pipelines are being used in the same ecosystem as an integrated environment, to support CI-CD devops journey. This eventually helps the existing team to use both the features of the same product in a seamless way.Similar Xray, can be used as a secure measure to protect …
Chose JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory has a much more friendly GUI, making package exploration less of a chore to do. Other than that, their features are pretty much comparable to each other. Both support multiple types of packages; both have API that can integrate well with CI/CD pipelines.
Chose JFrog Artifactory
I've worked in multiple organizations and used almost every reputed Artifact management tool and I found JFrog best and it's a very mature product also easy to use and manage.
Chose JFrog Artifactory
We migrated away from Sonatype Nexus a few years ago as it did not support the highly available architecture in AWS which we were seeking. It also didn't have the broad package support that [JFrog] Artifactory does.
Chose JFrog Artifactory
I used both Nexus and JFrog. It seems that, overall, JFrog is up a notch.
ProGet
Chose ProGet
Both Sonatype Nexus 3 and ProGet support all the feed types I use, but ProGet simply does them better.

The Docker feeds run on the same port as ProGet itself, while Nexus requires additional ports to be set up, which can be a burden when running in Docker.
Best Alternatives
JFrog ArtifactoryProGet
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JFrog ArtifactoryProGet
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
JFrog ArtifactoryProGet
Likelihood to Recommend
It works at scale and a large number of accessible pipelines for searching, repository updates and indexing will become easier. JFrog provides end-to-end solutions for all DevOps needs. With this, Jfrog Artifactory specifically implements the management of highly available repositories, with a smooth interface and integration with all the main CI tools on the market.
Read full review
As of current, the only artifactory management tool that I would recommend is ProGet. The free version is plentiful in features, supporting all feed types that the paid plans do. The paid plans also add even more capabilities on top of the free plan, such as data retention policies, which helps to minimize storage waste on my server and keep everything clean.
Read full review
Pros
  • Stores and Manages build artifacts and packages.
  • Works as container registry as well.
  • Easily manages local and remote repositories along with live replication.
Read full review
  • The Docker registry feature works great. Compared to Sonatype Nexus 3, I don't need to set up extra ports, as everything just works off the port ProGet itself is running on.
  • Debian feeds support automatic GPG key generation, without me having to create or manage them myself. This is another spot where ProGet is better than Nexus, as you have to manually create and specify a key with Nexus, while ProGet simply handles it all for you.
Read full review
Cons
  • CI/CD integration. We understood they do have a pipeline, so our organization already started with Jenkins, and my understanding is that not many orgs are using the JFrog pipeline.
Read full review
  • When running ProGet inside of a Docker container, changes to some settings requires a manual restart of the container (i.e. with 'docker restart x').
Read full review
Usability
The main problem that seems intractable is getting the checksum of the artifact. Managing container artifacts is a game changer for us during project execution, as the container artifact type exposes all base image and Docker file steps. This makes debugging or analysis easier. Jfrog Artifactory provides promotion feature and can automated from one environment repo to another environment repo before the deployment occurs.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Support tickets take days to respond. The most basic of questions that should be knocked out in a few hours don't get answers for days. Tickets are also closed without resolution.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
JFrog pipelines are being used in the same ecosystem as an integrated environment, to support CI-CD devops journey. This eventually helps the existing team to use both the features of the same product in a seamless way.Similar Xray, can be used as a secure measure to protect your containers and can be used as a Static Code analysis tool which can also be integrated in a Devops CI pipeline as a Left shift security strategy.
Read full review
Both Sonatype Nexus 3 and ProGet support all the feed types I use, but ProGet simply does them better. The Docker feeds run on the same port as ProGet itself, while Nexus requires additional ports to be set up, which can be a burden when running in Docker. Debian feeds also support GPG key creation without having to manually specify one, again, reducing the burden for me to manually do things, allowing me to set up and distribute my programs even quicker.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We now have a solid, reliable binary repository that can survive a regional outage in AWS when deployed properly
  • It has allowed us to focus on building mature CICD pipelines without having to worry about an unreliable binary repository.
Read full review
  • I don't need to develop custom solutions for distributing my software, as ProGet does it all for me.
  • ProGet also integrates easily into my CI systems, with a fully-featured API that allows me to upload packages right after building.
Read full review
ScreenShots