IBM SPSS Statistics vs. JMP

IBM SPSS Statistics

415 Reviews and Ratings

JMP

98 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
IBM SPSS Statistics	Score7.7 out of 10	N/A	SPSS Statistics is a software package used for statistical analysis. It is now officially named "IBM SPSS Statistics". Companion products in the same family are used for survey authoring and deployment (IBM SPSS Data Collection), data mining (IBM SPSS Modeler), text analytics, and collaboration and deployment (batch and automated scoring services).	$99 per month per user
JMP	Score9.2 out of 10	N/A	JMP® is statistical analysis software with capabilities that span from data access to advanced statistical techniques, with click of a button sharing. The software is interactive and visual, and statistically deep enough to allow users to see and explore data.	$1,320 per year per user

Pricing

IBM SPSS Statistics

JMP

Base: USD 3,830
one-time fee per user
Standard: USD 8,440
one-time fee per user
Professional: USD 16,900
one-time fee per user
Premium: USD 25,200
one-time fee per user
Monthly subscription: USD 99
per month per user
Annual subscription: USD 1,188.00
per year per user

JMP: $1320
per year per user

Pricing Offerings
IBM SPSS Statistics	JMP
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

Bulk discounts available.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	IBM SPSS Statistics	JMP
Considered Both Products	IBM Verified User Chose IBM SPSS Statistics The price of IBM SPSS and its quality-price ratio was one of the triggers for choosing the software over the competition. The ease of obtaining a demo of the product and the continuous training it presents was another of the key points in the decision making we made in the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM SPSS Statistics Its better for quick tasks, Psychology, Sociology, may lack in complex models, AI, or business-decision-making models. It's better for things that you want to compare, correlate or detect influence of one on the other. It's worse that R for complex models, custom models, big … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM SPSS Statistics None Incentivized Helpful? Abby Steele Workforce Development in Human Resources at OrthoIndy (Hospital & Health Care, 501-1000 employees) Chose IBM SPSS Statistics Compared to other similar programs such as R or SAS I find that SPSS is more user friendly to the researcher. I also have noticed that SPSS is more commonly used in other companies and schools research studies. This is great because it can allow for a step by step replication … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM SPSS Statistics I much prefer SPSS Incentivized Helpful? Rebecca T Barber, MBA, PHD Senior Director, Management Analysis in Finance and Accounting at Arizona State University (Higher Education, 10,001+ employees) Chose IBM SPSS Statistics I use Stata for tasks that SPSS cannot support, but ultimately SPSS has a short learning curve, strong statistical processing, and a mature tool set. SAS is also mature, but more programming based. JMP tries to 2nd guess what I need. NOTE: R (open source) is a great option … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM SPSS Statistics If I didn't want to code, IBM SPSS would be after JMP and Tableau, and before SAS and R. The user interface is very clunky compared to the analytics software I stated. You could definitely learn to do basic analysis faster in SAS than SPSS. I selected SPSS to test the … Incentivized Helpful? Julie Ressalam, MPH Project Manager in Quality Assurance at The University of Colorado Center for Bioethics and Humanities (Hospital & Health Care, 11-50 employees) Chose IBM SPSS Statistics I have also used RStudio and SAS previously. In fact, I'm currently using RStudio since our SPSS license has expired. SPSS lacks the capabilities of these other two programs and it is far less intuitive. Larger data sets can be analyzed with R and SAS, but using these programs … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose IBM SPSS Statistics IBM SPSS Statistics stacks up much better and overall gives the user a much better as well as simpler means to achieve their end goal. It provides a comprehensive set of well tested data management, along with statistical procedures in an easy to use and all in one package … Incentivized Helpful?	JMP Statistical Discovery Akshaya Bhardwaj Consultant in Information Technology at WNS Global Services (Outsourcing/Offshoring, 10,001+ employees) Chose JMP We just needed to get the output that contains the statistical output, graphs but no programming. Incentivized Helpful? Shelby Bowden Graduate Research Assistant in Research & Development at Western Kentucky University (Higher Education, 1001-5000 employees) Chose JMP Compared to other, similar programs, JMP is outstanding in ease of use and ability to be used by almost anyone across an organization. It is more fluid, user friendly, and, most importantly, requires no coding experience. The only two areas where it is not as good as … Incentivized Helpful? Gabriel Chiararia Marketing Analytics Consultant in Marketing at Whirlpool Corporation (Consumer Electronics, 51-200 employees) Chose JMP For me, JMP is the best and easy way to run regressions. I wouldn't use it for other more advanced models. I decided to use it because we got it for free since we are technically an academic institution. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose JMP For what it does, it has better value and is easier to train other users to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose JMP We actually use both JMP and IBM SPSS, but I think JMP's complexity lends itself to more in-depth statistical analyses. SPSS is designed for that as well, but we tend to use it more for quicker analyses, and we have found that JMP is far more powerful. Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	IBM SPSS Statistics	JMP
Likelihood to Recommend	4.1 (91 ratings)	9.0 (29 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.6 (22 ratings)	10.0 (16 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (14 ratings)	8.0 (6 ratings)
Availability	6.0 (1 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Performance	6.0 (1 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	6.4 (12 ratings)	9.2 (7 ratings)
Online Training	- (0 ratings)	7.9 (3 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.7 (7 ratings)	9.6 (2 ratings)
Configurability	5.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Data Sharing and Collaboration	- (0 ratings)	4.0 (1 ratings)
Data Sources	- (0 ratings)	5.0 (1 ratings)
Ease of integration	5.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Product Scalability	5.0 (1 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	5.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	5.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)