JobDiva vs. Lever

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JobDiva
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
JobDiva is a global applicant tracking system (ATS) and front-to-back talent management solution. JobDiva combines a CRM, synchronization with all major job boards and VMS providers, BI analytics, a mobile app, and a resume database. JobDiva also advertises unique search filters for screening resumes.N/A
Lever
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Lever is a Talent Acquisition Suite designed to help talent teams to reach their hiring goals and to connect companies with top talent. Lever provides ATS and applicant CRM capabilities, in LeverTRM. The Lever Hire and Lever Nurture features allow leaders to grow their people pipeline, build long-lasting relationships, and source the right people. Lever Analytics provides customized reports with data visualization, see offers completed and interview feedback, and it informs strategic decisions…N/A
Pricing
JobDivaLever
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JobDivaLever
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JobDivaLever
Considered Both Products
JobDiva
Chose JobDiva
JobDiva trounces Bullhorn from my experience. The user satisfaction rates don't lie, JobDiva is simply better from the user experience. Generally runs faster too.
Chose JobDiva
Not applicable - as I did not evaluate other products and JobDiva was already our ATS/CRM tool when I started my position.
Chose JobDiva
JobDiva has been fast and easy. FileMaker took a lot longer to build the program and was slow. JobDiva also makes it easier to make your own custom changes vs. in FileMaker we would need to reach out to the developer to make changes. JobDiva has been very user-friendly and easy …
Chose JobDiva
[I] used bullhorn years ago. Actively using JobDiva [for] the last 3 years. I think this is the best ATS. Every company must have this to make their work easier and highly profitable. Every user must learn JobDiva in depth so it will enhance their performance. Also, doing …
Chose JobDiva
We are currently in the process of trying to link Salesforce to JobDiva CRM. It has not been a smooth integration. There is a feeling that there is more for us to utilize in Salesforce, but we can't leave behind the ATS functionality on the recruiting side. No tool is …
Chose JobDiva
[I selected JobDiva because of its] Integrated search, Duplicate Candidate Prevention, Applicant Tracking, Resume management, Reports, Mail Merge, AI, etc. Everything is wonderful.
Chose JobDiva
Taleo worked okay for us. At the time, it provided a way to track applicants against a job, and that was really about it. When we decided to look at JobDiva, it came at the recommendation of several other companies who were in a Mentor/Protege program with our Senior …
Chose JobDiva
The ATS's I have used are not listed, Brassring, Taleo, SuccessFactors, none of them sourced and pulled candidates in from job boards.
Chose JobDiva
JobDiva is by far the most robust CRM I have used. JobDiva works with our firm to customize features for our specific needs. I would not move away from JobDiva.
Chose JobDiva
JobDiva is the most cost effective and detailed ATS system that can be customized to our precise needs.
Chose JobDiva
Bullhorn seemed very focused on integration with LinkedIn but was missing on other factors. WinSearch was lacking as an ATS on all fronts, mass email would go to same people, there was no real prevention of duplicates and there was really no great way to link information and …
Chose JobDiva
It is very user friendly and has a good customer support team and would not take a lot of time to onboard this tool so that is why we chose it.
Chose JobDiva
JobDiva is much more streamlined and easy to use. The database making algorithm of JobDiva is much stronger than bullhorn. JobDiva allows tracking of candidates much easier and making changes to any candidate profile is very hassle free. Searching resumes on different portals …
Chose JobDiva
I have not used anything else like this but it is a great platform that works very well. Also combines well with LinkedIn.
Chose JobDiva
Because I am using JobDiva since 3 years and I found it is perfect tool for staffing and recruitment.
Chose JobDiva
JobDiva was much cheaper than the other competitors which made it an obvious choice to try.
Chose JobDiva
I have not used any such ATS solutions as such diva, we have used Monster as well as Dice and CareerBuilder but JobDiva is all in one place.
Chose JobDiva
I like Crelate the best and I liked MaxHire also. I was not a huge fan of iCIMS, but think that Bullhorn/Maxhire were good. Out of all of the products I have used, I like Crelate and MaxHire the best. My leadership selected JobDiva and I am unsure of the reasons because I was …
Chose JobDiva
The best feature that I like the most that it has one of the best search features to have, it easily put a search to work and doing it in the background and will sort out the relevant and good candidates for next day which is amazing to have because it reduces the work and …
Chose JobDiva
Easier to manage activities, more creative sourcing and tracking of action items, candidate status and ability to creatively recruit.
Lever
Chose Lever
Lever doesn't have quite as many features as Greenhouse, and Greenhouse would probably be a better choice for a large enterprise organization, but for small enterprises and below, Lever will work great, and it's quite a bit less expensive.
Chose Lever
Lever is more visually intuitive. It is a faster platform since it requires less clicking around to accomplish tasks.
Chose Lever
I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and GreenHouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over GreenHouse for a reason. I just don't know if …
Chose Lever
Lever's candidate first view over job requisition view is confusing and often managers are unable to get a real time update of their pipeline, I've found. I'd recommend Greenhouse
Chose Lever
Lever is comparable to Greenhouse in its basic recruiting functions. I have found it to be WAY better than Bullhorn (clunky and overly-complicated with a very dated and non-intuitive interface) and Jazz HR (slick and pretty, but limited in its functions). The best ATS I've used …
Chose Lever
I will be reaching out to Greenhouse to compare, but I am not familiar with the product just that it has a good reputation. UKG (Ulitpro) was worse than Lever when I used it last.
Chose Lever
I strongly prefer greenhouse, but lever will get the job done. Equal cost I go with greenhouse. If Lever is much cheaper they aren't wildly differentiated
Chose Lever
Lever is a great option for nonprofit organizations, campaigns, and the like. It is an easy enough system for both the operations team and prospective job candidates to use, facilitate, and navigate with little to no training. It is also a huge time saver when trying to fill …
Chose Lever
I wasn't part of the evaluation process but it seems like Lever was selected due to its simplicity and ability for employees to easily refer their friends to work here. As mentioned, I wish there was more collaboration involved throughout the hiring process--could be something …
Chose Lever
Lever is one of the best products out there because the customer support is so great. They are super helpful and can help in any way you need. This is what makes it stand out against other products.
Chose Lever
Lever is a less 'mature' ATS. Also much less expensive. iCIMS is a much more robust ATS.
Chose Lever
We have used Recruiterbox previously, but the recruitment team decommissioned it due to a few reasons that I am not sure of. However, I can see that lever generally aesthetically is more pleasing to use.
Chose Lever
I think that lever is much more secure and manageable than similar tools, especially when dealing with warm referrals. Lever may not have the outbound/social aspect that other cold-recruitment tools may have, but as I said before I think the quality of hires has increased …
Chose Lever
Lever and Recruiterbox are comparable systems. Lever allows for better "interview panels" which must be scheduled individually in Recruiterbox.
Chose Lever
We were using a free version of Breezy before. It was clunky and difficult to use. The time spent trying to navigate the product could be better spent on candidates. I used it for a few weeks while waiting for Lever to get spun up, and the transition from one to the other was …
Chose Lever
From an interviewer perspective, both are similar in that they provide easy feedback inputs and organization. Overall I liked Greenhouse better in my previous role because it seemed to have more customization around quantitative evaluation. You could break down more skills with …
Chose Lever
That's a tall order to ask. It's the latest generation ATS and seemed easier to configure than Greenhouse. SmartRecruiter didn't appear to have the reporting we wanted. In comparison to Taleo and Brassring it is superlative. It is definitely clear that they spoke to actual …
Chose Lever
I checked different products mainly based on paper. There was a kind of Gartner chart available which described the strength and weaknesses of the systems. I matched my thoughts with this document which brought me to Lever due to the following reasons: 1. Have the potential to …
Chose Lever
Lever was certainly more expensive than a beta test for GoogleHire, and about on par with Greenhouse. We ultimately went with Lever over Greenhouse due to its sleek, intuitive UI design. And we chose Lever over GoogleHire beta program because the latter didn't seem to provide …
Chose Lever
Lever is easily the most effective ATS that I've used. It blows much of the competition away with respect to how well it integrates with our email system and allows easy collaboration.
Features
JobDivaLever
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
JobDiva
9.1
Ratings
13% above category average
Lever
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Job Requisition Management9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Company Website Posting9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media8.90 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customized Application Form9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Resume Management9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Candidate Search8.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Collaboration9.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Email Templates10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
User Permissions10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reporting9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JobDivaLever
Small Businesses
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JobDivaLever
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
1.1
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
JobDivaLever
Likelihood to Recommend
The functionality the platform holds is top-notch where I can house details regarding contact information, requested rates, what jobs we're submitting them to, and all the personal information (CV, certifications, degrees, etc) that we obtain from our candidates. It's extremely helpful that I am able to submit candidates externally as that is our M.O. routinely. I really like it.
Read full review
Managing pipeline and candidate communication is easy through lever. Keeping it all in one place allows the hiring teams to be in the loop real-time. The reporting is clunky and basic, however, and without a 3rd party tool, sourcing from the lever database is difficult. Also, it is very easy to have duplicate candidates since the alerts Lever gives are often incorrect
Read full review
Pros
  • I am working in the staffing industry for the last 5+ years. When I joined this industry, initially we had to do all the things manually in Microsoft Excel, It is too time-consuming and looks boring.
  • I have been using JobDiva, for the last four years, and it works amazing.
  • Now my report generation is very easy and I [can] click on the go.
Read full review
  • Great integration: Keeps a list of Outlook email communication along with LinkedIn and other data sources
  • Is fairly lively, not too much lag between screens even though it is looking through a lot of data.
  • Has excellent reporting on how well each email message is working.
Read full review
Cons
  • LinkedIn Sales Navigator Integration (I understand LI is holding this up)
  • Report enhancements (i.e.: growth of hotlists, etc)
  • Integration with SeamlessAI
  • Correct delays with BI, be able to set date range before querying data so that it doesn't lag/not load due to vast data.
  • More consolidated product education. Each person seems to only know about their product and not about the other features a client might ask about.
  • I would like more help with feature enablement/road-mapping how we get there rather than just pointing me toward the help section
  • I would love JobDiva to offer clients JobDiva Super User training so we can have our internal experts who understand the tool and possibilities.
Read full review
  • It would be nice if we were provided a more detailed summary of why our referrals were not selected for a position.
  • The feedback feature that interviewers can give on candidates is great, but it is sometimes hard to find again after completion.
  • If there is a mobile version, better marketing/awareness on this would be helpful.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Our company is moving to a more nuanced and focused type of recruiting style and the more recruiters we bring on, the less we need to worry about aggregating large pools of resume as the recruiting team does that with better more detailed information. The more detailed our database becomes the more we build a more reliable pool of candidates and the more the slowness of the systems become more and more problematic
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Its easy to use for me. but a few of my recruiters having difficulty using it. They have problems with mail merge, opting out from mail merge. They are also unable to find other options like applicants, doing some basic settings, sending mail merge again and again for the same job, avoiding sending emails to uninterested candidates etc.
Read full review
It isn't difficult to use for the applicant processing, but [I feel] if you want to pull reports or use their tools, good luck!
Read full review
Performance
Over all I think JobDiva works well. It has some issues from time to time, but the support staff seems to handle it quickly. The major issue is the email merges getting black listed as spam. That takes away a very important JobDiva feature. That is our major functionality complaint these days
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Usually, we don't come across downtime or any such issues. However, whenever required, the Support team is always up and ready to solve it as soon as possible. One of its best features is it always Notifies users of any changes related to any of its uses or new additions.
Read full review
What support? - Add a ticket and get links to [I believe] their unhelpful user guide. Add a charge if you want better support - afterward just got those links faster...
Read full review
In-Person Training
The support team is quick in responding with to the point answers. Jobidva has few great features like Divareach.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
I wasnt part of the training as i joined after Ceipal signed agreement with us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
This is a SaaS platform so the implementation is easy. One thing to consider is to make sure your organization has agreed to this system. Not all will like it but atleast everyone must understand how this will impact Staffing efforts in a positive way. Once everyone is bought then the rest is smooth. The reason I mention this is because after the implementation some where reluctant to change thus not maximizing JOBDIVA to its full capacity.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We are currently in the process of trying to link Salesforce to JobDiva CRM. It has not been a smooth integration. There is a feeling that there is more for us to utilize in Salesforce, but we can't leave behind the ATS functionality on the recruiting side. No tool is perfect, so we continue to look for opportunities to improve our processes.
Read full review
I think Lever stacks up fairly well and is right above the midpoint. iCIMS and Greenhouse provide a larger, more Enterprise style product for huge scale, so I'd put the two of them above Lever at this time, but we chose Lever over Greenhouse for a reason. I just don't know if we'd be able to scale to the size we'd want to long-term with their product suite. Compared to the others listed here, and many others, I would take Lever every time.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It had a positive impact of the number of candidates I was able to reach and which actually helped to increase the hiring rate at one of our clients.
  • The reporting system in JobDiva. It actually helped to focus more on the business objectives instead of documenting about each and every employee.
  • The only negative it had was that in a ew positions (asking for niche skills), when it required to submit candidates in a quick time, the other vendors were able t he win the race.
Read full review
  • We have an ATS now and did not have one before
  • LinkedIn integration is better than others I've seen
  • Spend too much time researching unhelpful user guides since their support is terrible
  • Lots of frustration with post implementation support
  • Integrations break, tools don't work and settings fail which could lead to other issues
Read full review
ScreenShots

JobDiva Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Lever Screenshots

Screenshot of the interface to resurface high-value past candidates who fit open roles.Screenshot of where to identify the top origin and sources of candidates in all stages, the Offer stage, and the Hired stage.Screenshot of the interface to schedule interviews with candidates.