Jotform Enterprise is a digital workspace productivity tool that provides a platform for organizations. The aim of Jotform Enterprise is to give companies an easy-to-navigate tool that makes reaching out to customers, collaborating with coworkers, and collecting e-signatures and data a more seamless process. Jotform Enterprise strives to enable companies to make data-driven decisions without compromising when it comes to quality and security. It doesn’t matter what type of…
$0
Projector PSA
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Projector's cloud-based Professional Services Automation (PSA) software helps project-based services organizations track time and expenses, invoice clients, schedule resources, and manage projects. Its three modules span a more comprehensive set of uses than typical project management software. The Accounting module helps the user track time and expenses and manage invoices and billing. Also it syncs with the company's accounting systems as a sub-ledger. The Resource Scheduling module matches…
$15
per user
Pricing
Jotform
Projector PSA
Editions & Modules
Free
$0.00
Bronze
$34.00
Monthly
Silver
$39.00
Monthly
Gold
$99.00
Monthly
Enterprise
Custom
Team Edition
$15
per user
Professional Edition
$25
per user
Enterprise Edition
$30
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jotform
Projector PSA
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jotform
Projector PSA
Features
Jotform
Projector PSA
Survey Format & Appearance
Comparison of Survey Format & Appearance features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Survey templates
8.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Themes
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom logo/branding
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Content
Comparison of Survey Content features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.6
Ratings
11% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Changes to live survey
7.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Question design help
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple question types
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Logic
Comparison of Survey Logic features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.3
Ratings
12% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Survey logic flexibility
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Survey Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.5
Ratings
8% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Response tracking
7.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data export
7.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Analytics
7.20 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Administration & Security
Comparison of Survey Administration & Security features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.4
Ratings
16% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Access controls
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Survey Distribution
Comparison of Survey Distribution features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
7.1
Ratings
14% below category average
Projector PSA
-
Ratings
Vendor-offered crowdsourcing
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Respondent restrictions
7.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Jotform
-
Ratings
Projector PSA
7.4
Ratings
3% below category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
7.50 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
5.80 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
5.20 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
8.50 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
7.60 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
3.70 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
9.50 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
5.20 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
8.10 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
With a vast selection of pre-designed templates to choose from, ranging from event registrations to customer feedback surveys, JotForm caters to a broad spectrum of needs. Each template is fully customizable, allowing you to align the form's aesthetics with your brand identity effortlessly. JotForm has arrived to streamline and elevate your processes to a whole new level.
We think Projector PSA is a great tool to track and manage people in a professional service environment like management consulting. This system is easy to set up, easy to understand and should easily suit the needs of smaller and medium sized firms. It may be less appropriate for firms that rely very heavily on project management through another system (like MS Project) or firms that rely very heavily on a sales pipeline tracking system. While still very much possible to use, you would (I believe) have to do some re-keying between systems
The ease of use is my favorite part of the Jotform. You don't have to be an IT guru to use it, but the results of your creation will surely make people think you are.
Jotform keeps all my event request organized and accurate.
Time tracking. For a service company that typically bills retainers, it is very important to be able to assign a direct cost to your resources at all levels and analyze your profitability.
Expense reporting. Projector easily tracks expenses of all types and allows you to categorize them under non-billable projects, client billable projects and/or client development ventures.
Reporting. Projector has a large list of standard reports right at your fingertips. These reports can be extracted as Excel docs, mdp files and other useful formats. They are intuitive, clear and easy to analyze. For those you need on a standard basis, you can set them up to pull on a recurring basis. It should be noted that all reports are easily customized and Projector's support team is always there to help get you the information you need.
I would love for Jotform to offer an a la carte for some of the products like maybe we pay for more form views and submissions but not all the other stuff.
Flexibility in css.
More options in the name field, maybe I want the last name first or for it to be a full one entry box.
We have been using this tool for a year now and find our use of it continually evolves and broadens. We are also very excited about the overhaul that's under way and feel many of the improvements being put in place will help make us that much more effective and efficient. The Projector team is also very responsive and collaborative in terms of user feedback and improvement suggestions, which helps us know they will work hard to help us get what we need out of the tool.
It is very user-friendly and intuitive. The interface is very simple and straightforward. The elements are easily accessible even without having any prior knowledge of the interface. The customer support is incredibly awesome. They respond to you within 24-48hrs tops. They also provide a list of questions and answers that have already been asked.
Their support is truly awful and negligent [in my opinion]. It's rare for me to get so mad as to write a review about it but given what we do, I think it's necessary to document it. We work in mental health and having client data [transmitted] through the API correctly can be a matter of life and death for someone in crisis. We have had repeated issues with this in JotForm and reset the integration multiple times and yet it continues. [In my experience] tags don't transmit, complete contacts are absent, or parts of data [are] missing despite being mapped. [Again, per my experience] their support will initially respond and then you hear nothing. It's been a huge issue and we are leaving them as a result. [I feel] it's truly infuriating and negligent.
Had to opt for Jotform to open in a separate window for some of my phones as being intergrated into my own site caused restricted viewing problems on some devices like mobiles.
Compared to Google and Microsoft, Jotform has a lot more features. I particularly love the e-signature because it makes the form feel more trustworthy for our team.
When compared to the other form builders, it is frankly too expensive for us to use them, while Jotform has just enough features for casual users like us.
We switched to Projector from Open Air. While Open Air was a good tool, we found it wasn't really designed for project management at the level of detail we needed from our PSA and used MS Project and Excel to supplement Open Air. We also struggled with the invoicing side of it, manually combining invoice summaries with custom time and expense reports in Acrobat. Projector however, was designed for project management. We are able to manage projects, track time and expenses, and invoice all out of one system. The project setup can accommodate a wide range of complexity, including milestones, dependencies, etc. Project and resource dashboards also help see the services portfolio and team at a summary level and allows us to zero in on particulars easily and more meaningfully than we were ever able to with Open Air. Invoice templates are also easily customized and we were able to get several set up quickly to meet our needs. Lastly, Open Air required us to purchase and pre-pay licensing for a year, so if we lost staff mid-way through the year, the unused seat was not prorated. Projector licensing is paid monthly based on actual number of active users that month, which makes more sense for a team with fluctuating headcount.
It saved me time. Within minutes I was able to create and share forms to collect demographic data.
While struggling to use another software, I thought of Jotform and it was able to assist me with collating the data I had to confirm results previously obtained.
I could not easily identify what new information was provided in a resubmission by a respondent.
Even in the small time that I stayed to see Projector PSA reporting I saw ROI projections become more realistic. There was real data to analyze that proved we were spending way too much and charging way too less on some projects.
Although employees were not used at entering their hours, this single reporting improved operations management and validated employees concerns that more people were needed to manage workload
Project proposals were more realistic because they were driven by real data.
Decision making overall for the department became more efficient and effective