Adobe Stock vs. JumpStory

If you're looking for quality professional images for sales and marketing collateral, presentations, social media pages, and graphics, it's great. If you have a very specific industry or subject, sometimes it is too cumbersome to find what you need. They need a better variety of people in their images as well.

Incentivized

Not well suited for anything compared to other options. All major competitors in stock imagery space perform better in every way that mattered to us

• Presents a huge collection of distinctive graphics with all sorts of options to fit the user's particular need of the day.
• Allows for easy grab-and-go, cut-and-paste of the sample proofs so that a graphic designer can work up an idea and present it to the team before purchasing it.
• Operates a user-friendly platform so that team members who haven't used the program but is suddenly needed to jump in on a project can figure it out quickly.

Incentivized

• Find stock photos
• Download different sizes
• Save images

• I really do wish Adobe Stock would offer editorial-based content. There are no historical photos, photos of world figures, or other event-based content. We have to go to Getty for that.
• Their video offerings are OK, but there is room for improvement.
• The current enter-level monthly plan does not provide for any video downloads at all.

Incentivized

• Limited selection of imagery with poor search capability.
• No ability to filter.
• The AI is useless.
• Scammy "trial period" that auto-switches to the expensive annual paid plan without notice.

Because it is easy to use, has a robust database of all kinds of photos, has industry photos that we serve clients in, is quick and easy to download the licensed images, easy to find similar images, cost effective, acts as a source of quality images we can use on high resolution art.

Incentivized

the user interface is very basic their filter function is difficult for beginners to use although after sometime of use you wont find any problem in that, their library is good but again. they still have to work on their library volume with current quality standards. apart from interface which is a personal perspective everything is amazing in this platform.

Incentivized

The usability of the platform is average at best.

It's always available

Incentivized

It loads quickly and we have not had any issues

Incentivized

Never really used it.

Incentivized

The customer support did not try to resolve my issue with the accidental charging and the refund I requested. Although they were quick to answer my email.

In comparison to other options, Adobe Stock is far more user-friendly. Adobe Stock has helped me find quality photos. One-stop licensing's convenience and variety were important. Instead of buying photos per image, we usually find something similar at Adobe and license it under our subscription. I prefer Adobe's curated resources over other services. Adobe Stock's filters make finding the right image easy.

Incentivized

it is the worst of all options

It's a little expensive

Incentivized

It's very easy to integrate

Incentivized

• I used stock photos for my blog posting on medium and website creation. I found adobe stock a very amazing site for high-quality images.
• It has resolved the issue where I would spend countless hours looking for a photo on Google or other stock-image websites, no other stock photos website is perfect and stunning like Adobe Stock. Overall, it's a fantastic time-saver.
• Overall, I found images impact more than words while blog posting on medium and other social media, so I can say that Adobe Stock helps me in growing my startup…

Incentivized

• it cost us money that would have been much better spent elsewhere
• it cost us time to try to deal with the company by email and to write reviews
• it annoyed us while testing and aggravated us when we learned we had been duped