HPE Juniper Access Points

HPE Juniper Access Points

4 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
HPE Juniper Access Points	Score9.9 out of 10	N/A	The Juniper AP Series Access Points work in conjunction with the Juniper Mist Cloud Architecture and Mist AI to collect and analyze metadata in near real-time from all wireless clients. This is to enable rapid problem detection and root cause identification with predictive recommendations and proactive correction realizing the self-driving network.	N/A

Pricing

HPE Juniper Access Points

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
HPE Juniper Access Points
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Optional

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	HPE Juniper Access Points
Considered Both Products	Juniper Networks Robbie Evans Assistant IT Director in Information Technology at CRAVEN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA (Government Administration, 1001-5000 employees) Chose HPE Juniper Access Points Mist has more features than meraki in regards to wireless management. Adding devices is still simple and licensing is much easier to undertsf Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose HPE Juniper Access Points I've used a variety of other APs and WLAN systems. Juniper provides an outstanding product and their support is top notch. The Mist portal is intuitive for most admins that have an intermediate understanding of WLANs. The product is very reliable, and they provide value in … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose HPE Juniper Access Points We deploy HPE Juniper Access Points in the busy busy busy areas. The Ruckus devices are just in for the long haul because that's what we had to start with. As they die off we would go HPE Juniper Access Points. Incentivized Helpful? Jonathan Butler Systems Administrator in Information Technology at Randolph Central School Corporation (Education Management, 201-500 employees) Chose HPE Juniper Access Points Meraki and Juniper both utilize cloud-based controllers. This enables easier configuration without requiring local controller hardware. Both Meraki and Juniper utilize AI to help manage their devices and make adjustments to keep the system running at optimal performance. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose HPE Juniper Access Points I say Meraki UI's is more friendly. Also, their layer 7 visibility is a lot better. You can get more details about the devices on Meraki's UI vs MIST UI. Meraki is more expensive though. Omada is entry for SMB. Its a nice system but buggy. I would not go back to Omada for our … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose HPE Juniper Access Points I prefer Juniper. Configuring the extreme environment was odd and clunky. Three years after we deployed Extreme I got informed the virtual controller we were using was end of life. The APs were still good, just the controller was end of life. I had to deploy a new virtual … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose HPE Juniper Access Points Much easier to manage them and configure them. When we used Aruba central to manage the newer AP's, it seemed a little clunky and didn't always like the placement or what port it was connected to. Troubleshooting Juniper AP's is much easier with Mist over using Aruba Central. … Incentivized Helpful? Caleb Whorton Technology Director in Information Technology at Coosa County Schools (Government Administration, 51-200 employees) Chose HPE Juniper Access Points Juniper and the Mist console are far superior to access points and admin consoles I have worked with in the past. You can utilize the Mist effectively even if you don't have a background in networking or a lot of experience early on without a real learning curve. So far, they … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic