Juniper SRX

Juniper SRX

Juniper SRX

34 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Juniper SRX	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	Juniper SRX is a firewall offering. It provides a variety of modular features, scaled for enterprise-level use, based on a 3-in-1 OS that enables routing, switching, and security in each product.	N/A

Pricing

Juniper SRX

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Juniper SRX
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Juniper SRX
Considered Both Products	Juniper SRX Verified User Anonymous Chose Juniper SRX Juniper SRX stands tall compared to all these products for Large Service Provider Networks, where traffic volume is larger. Also, cost comparison with SRX's few other products can also be another contributing factor while selecting this. As well as Juniper Routers, Switches, … Incentivized Helpful? Amr Momtaz Cloud Migration Architect Chose Juniper SRX The juniper is very versatile router/firewall box. it is an excellent router/edge device with zone based firewall. Incentivized Helpful? Eric Stephenson Staff System Engineer Chose Juniper SRX The comparison between the different firewalls is really down to preference and price at this point. The SRX is a solid device, and we have not seen a hardware failure to date. The Juniper support I have had is stellar and has helped me out with larger more complex scenario … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Juniper SRX Equipment prices ran about the same. Performance and management were also more or less equal. The biggest deciding factors for going with Juniper were (1) fewer security incidents related to SRX firewalls and (2) technical support costs were significantly less. Incentivized Helpful? Randy Carpenter Vice President Chose Juniper SRX Juniper SRX is significantly better in every category. Cisco ASA was terrible. The config is unintuitive and not easy to manage. Cisco left the ASA abandoned from any kind of meaningful software updates for around a decade. Incentivized Helpful? Robert Beck Network Engineer Chose Juniper SRX I love the Cisco ASA but I've become used to the SRX. I am a CLI kind of guy so the SRX works for me. Others may be more GUI based so the ASA may be more comfortable to you. If that's the case then the ASA's ASDM is a solid platform to manage your FW. Junos hasn't gotten this … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Juniper SRX The SRX Stacks up well to the ASA and Sonic wall but I feel the features provided by Fortigate/Palo Alto and Checkpoint far exceed that of the competitors. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Juniper SRX

Firewall

Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
	Juniper SRX 8.7 Ratings 1% above category average
Identification Technologies	9.00 Ratings
Visualization Tools	7.00 Ratings
Content Inspection	8.00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls	10.00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP	8.00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console	7.00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging	8.00 Ratings
VPN	10.00 Ratings
High Availability	10.00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection	10.00 Ratings
Proxy Server	9.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Juniper SRX
Small Businesses	pfSense Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises	Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series Score 10.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Juniper SRX
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	6.4 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Juniper SRX
Likelihood to Recommend	Juniper vSRX is an excellent edge gateway device. The combination of Tunneling protocols supported and the advanced routing & security features makes it perfect for this kind of deployment. It is available in physical, virtual appliances as well as support on multiple clouds so you can have the same box be your edge gateway in multiple environments for consistency. It can also work as a Internet Gateway, DMZ Firewall/Router and it would function just fine. While it can also work as a DC firewall (North-South), the poor GUI will make it harder in the day to day administration for the multiple policies in a DC. Incentivized Amr Momtaz Cloud Migration Architect Read full review
Pros	The Juniper SRX platform is easy to set up (out of the box). The support team responds to tickets quickly and with good solutions. Incentivized Bear Golightly IT Operations Manager / IT Service Manager Read full review
Cons	Some of the more complex setups (clustered HA, etc.) can be a little difficult to configure. The lowest-end model that supports true multi-site HA is relatively expensive. It would be nice to have that option in lower models. Some configuration options (particularly the way address book entries are done) can get tedious and make for very long configs. Incentivized Randy Carpenter Vice President Read full review
Support Rating	This is the one area where I have a beef with Juniper. When I called into Cisco TAC, 90% of the time, the first person I spoke with was able to resolve my issue. With Juniper TAC, 90% of the time, the first person I speak with is not able to resolve my issue, seems to almost be reading from a script, and must escalate my ticket. All of which takes time. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Equipment prices ran about the same. Performance and management were also more or less equal. The biggest deciding factors for going with Juniper were (1) fewer security incidents related to SRX firewalls and (2) technical support costs were significantly less. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	It is a workhorse for our field operations. It provides the last touch for an ISP to the customer. The customer has no view of the device, but with the repeatability of the device, they do not need to. The ability to roll out a dynamic routing protocol attached to a security zone allows elasticity to the environment that supports growth. VLAN support on the inside interfaces allow this to be the only device in some smaller deployments we install these in. Incentivized Eric Stephenson Staff System Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots