Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…
N/A
KNIME Analytics Platform
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
KNIME enables users to analyze, upskill, and scale data science without any coding. The platform that lets users blend, transform, model and visualize data, deploy and monitor analytical models, and share insights organization-wide with data apps and services.
$0
Pricing
Jupyter Notebook
KNIME Analytics Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
KNIME Community Hub Personal Plan
$0
KNIME Analytics Platform
$0
KNIME Community Hub Team Plan
€99
per month 3 users
KNIME Business Hub
From €35,000
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jupyter Notebook
KNIME Analytics Platform
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jupyter Notebook
KNIME Analytics Platform
Considered Both Products
Jupyter Notebook
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Jupyter Notebook
As a beginner I tried all of them but finally due to simple and user friendly interface I opted it. I also tried visual basic which is also good platform with versatility, however for basic need it is the best.
Jupyter is very easy to understand and easy to use. And can also be used by a student, freelancer, small industries, big industries. Jupyter also provides you a tool to work with machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Jupyter Notebook is very attractive platform for new developers to code and to learn programming and perform tasks as compared to other IDE. It has very well and easy visualization, interactive programming and sharing the live code and slideshow is very easy as compare to …
Jupyter is still the most well known and widely used platform I've seen. Using it over other competition like Zeppelin simply because of its availability, and my familiarity with its functionality.
Jupyter Notebook is unique in that it offers a flexible, lightweight, easy-to-replicate way of organizing your code in a visually intuitive fashion that can be exported in a number of formats. I've found that the broad functionalities available within the notebooks suit a lot …
Well, so far Jupyter Notebook has been the better tool for me. It gives us more freedom & has more ability to train ML models & do the data visualization more efficiently. It's easier to operate & has a very simple-to-understand UI & with the support for taking data from …
I have used PyCharm as well as Jupyter Notebook and for me, Jupyter wins almost every time. I really like its user-friend interface for someone who is new to python programming. The ability to run a big chunk of code part by part is a big game-changer for me. One thing I would …
It should have cleaner support for multi-environment setup and should also increase the amount of features. Moreover, more support should be present for other programming languages. It should also have the option to set a specific location that opens up whenever I run command …
Jupyter Notebook has a nicer interface than RStudio in our opinion and since most of our group is familiar with Jupyter Notebook it has made it a default choice. Overall the interactive programming as well as the easy visualizations, model deployment, and markdown made Jupyter …
Jupyter Notebook is the core feature extended on by many commercial alternatives. The commercial alternatives have more feature integration with the rest of their portfolio. RStudio is another competitor for interactive and literate programming.
An interesting thing is that Jupyter Notebook is run on browser environments which may or may not be a positive feature according to cases. VS Code on [the] other hand doesn't use any interface and can run Jupyter Notebooks too. Sometimes my browser consumes too much RAM due to …
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better …
I like Jupyter Notebook over the other two because it keeps my work more organized. It helps me to structure my workflow and the ability to run commands in chunks keeps me from being confused when coming back to the work after some time.
I selected Jupyter Notebook because this is better integrated with the existing production systems than optional tools (for example, R). It is also commonly used tool within the scientist community.
When I tried Zeppelin in 2017, it was still in initial versions, Jupyter was way ahead as of then. Zeppelin had limitations and I wasn't confident of it making progress as much as Jupyter.
Alteryx is a very similar product, almost all the things that are achievable in KNIME Analytics Platform can be done in Alteryx as well, but you have to pay for the Desktop version to conduct the analysis. But with KNIME Analytics Platform it is totally free and can be used …
As a commercial product Alteryx is more polished and can be even easier for a beginner, but KNIME beats Alteryx in functionality and performance. Dataiku takes the integration with Python and Git further than KNIME but isn't at the level of Alteryx and KNIME with its No …
There are two aspects which put KNIME Analytics Platform ahead of other products. Firstly the fact that KNIME Analytics Platform comes at no cost and no restrictions on its use is an instant winner for any organisation wanting to democratise their data. It means that a client …
Our organization also reviewed the Alteryx platform. From our experience KNIME had more functionality, was more stable, responsive, had more features, and was overall a better product from our experience. Alteryx is also a paid product, while KNIME is free.
Alteryx : allows for generally "data" knowledgeable workers to easily implement and develop a data model in an automated fashion. The collaboration tools built in also make is easy for members to share work, best practices, and custom modules
Having used both the Alteryx and [KNIME Analytics] I can definitely feel the ease of using the software of alteryx. The [KNIME Analytics] on the other hand isn't that great but is 90% of what alteryx can do along with how much ease it can do. Having said that, the 90% …
Knime is a more flexible option in some ways, allowing for more data manipulation if you can find the right node. It is not as scaleable in some cases, and some tasks are just easier and faster on SQL databases. It does not build charts or reports as easily as a Tableau and …
Data Scientist - Biotech Data Science Digtialization (BDSD)
Chose KNIME Analytics Platform
KNIME Analytics Platform has a nice visualization comparing to Azure Machine Learning Studio. KNIME also has a good amount of built-in preprocessing nodes and ML training nodes that makes it easier to develop workflow instead of writing codes. However this also limits the …
KNIME is a lower price point and has strong cross platform capabilities. Other platforms are locked to a specific operating system and cost in some cases substantially more, making them less good choices for smaller businesses that still need basic data unification. The fact …
Comparing the KNIME Analytics Platform to Anaconda and MATLAB, KNIME Analytics Platform's upsides are ease of use thanks to graphical interface and intuitiveness, no requirement of programming/coding and pre-existing nodes. Anybody can use it and create models even though …
We need to use SAS/STAT package within SAS to use the advanced statistical functions, but KNIME has inbuilt libraries for the same. Also, the integration with Open source (Python, R, Java codes) allows better scalability & more availability of skilled resources to work upon.
Knime is much more user simple than any high-level programming language. The ability to connect nodes ad produces outputs in minutes is a large benefit for this program
I would rate it 9/10 while recommending Jupyter Notebook as it offers me a wide range of functionality to operate. It is very well suited for someone who is new to python programming as the user interface helps you build code line by line. I personally have written multiple programs in Python using Jupyter Notebook as it helps me organize long code by breaking it in a structure. Also the ability to write comments using '#' helps a lot to a reader understand the code.
KNIME Analytics Platform has vastly improved our effectiveness when working with large data sets. The self documenting GUI allows analysts to focus on what they are trying to accomplish, not complex code syntax. If we were to use traditional tools, like SQL, work would take much longer and it would be more difficult to collaborate both internally and with clients. Since KNIME Analytics Platform is database oriented, some spreadsheet functions are not supported, which is as it should be. For small data sets we often use Excel vlookup and pivot tables in place of KNIME Analytics Platform. If VBA code is requried, we go to KNIME Analytics Platform as we find VBA to be unstable in Excel.
Visual programming as oppose to scripting encourages data analysts to reap deeper insights from their data
Large community contribution in extending the KNIME Analytics Platform into other areas of analytics, e.g. Text Analytics, Predictive Analytics, ML, etc.
Open source with periodic updates ensures it is equipped to deal with the most sophisticated data analytics use case
Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Automation - e.g. RapidMiner Studio provides a Turbo Prep function, where one can get to working on models more quickly (RapidMiner is not open source though)
KNIME does not replace a regular reporting tool - it is not meant to. However, if I have already spent some time developing a data acquisition and analytical model, it would be nice to be able to deploy, for example, a monitoring or reporting module that would process data autonomously and react accordingly.
We are happy with Knime product and their support. Knime AP is versatile product and even can execute Python scripts if needed. It also supports R execution as well; however, it is not being used at our end
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
The training KNIME Analytics Platform provide helps you get to grips with a product that is already very intuitive. There is a KNIME Analytics Platform way of thinking about addressing problems, but once you understand a couple of patterns which you see again and again in your workflow it all makes sense.
KNIME's HQ is in Europe, which makes it hard for US companies to get customer service in time and on time. Their customer service also takes on average 1 to 2 weeks to follow up with your request. KNIME's documentation is also helpful but it does not provide you all the answers you need some of the time.
KNIME Analytics Platform is easy to install on any Windows, Mac or Linux machine. The KNIME Server product that is currently being replaced by the KNIME Business Hub comes as multiple layers of software and it took us some time to set up the system right for stability. This was made harder by KNIME staff's deeper expertise in setting up the Server in Linux rather than Windows environment. The KNIME Business Hub promises to have a simpler architecture, although currently there is no visibility of a Windows version of the product.
Jupyter Notebook is unique in that it offers a flexible, lightweight, easy-to-replicate way of organizing your code in a visually intuitive fashion that can be exported in a number of formats. I've found that the broad functionalities available within the notebooks suit a lot of needs I have for EDA, modeling, and data export that makes other software products fairly redundant.
There are two aspects which put KNIME Analytics Platform ahead of other products. Firstly the fact that KNIME Analytics Platform comes at no cost and no restrictions on its use is an instant winner for any organisation wanting to democratise their data. It means that a client is free to install it on as many machines as they wish without worrying about costs, the number of seats required or payment models or procurement negotiation. It also means that we are not building costs into our clients business. Secondly, KNIME Analytics Platform has a very comprehensive set of tools for importing/exporting data, data manipulation and data science. Some products offer analytics packages on top of their base offering at additional cost and they are still not as comprehensive as what you get with KNIME Analytics Platform for free. For some types of analysis you may require to download additional packages with KNIME Analytics Platform, but its invariably at no cost, those packages are kept out of the main download to keep the size down. Due to the easy integration with R and Python, I view KNIME Analytics Platform as also having the capabilities of those languages too. This has helped me in the past with seamlessly importing a rare filetype and using very specific models not directly available in KNIME Analytics Platform.
It is suited for data mining or machine learning work but If we're looking for advanced stat methods such as mixed effects linear/logistics models, that needs to be run through an R node.
Thinking of our peers with an advanced visualization techniques requirement, it is a lagging product.