Jupyter Notebook vs. TensorFlow

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…N/A
TensorFlow
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. It was originally developed by Google.N/A
Pricing
Jupyter NotebookTensorFlow
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jupyter NotebookTensorFlow
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jupyter NotebookTensorFlow
Considered Both Products
Jupyter Notebook
Chose Jupyter Notebook
As a beginner I tried all of them but finally due to simple and user friendly interface I opted it. I also tried visual basic which is also good platform with versatility, however for basic need it is the best.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter is very easy to understand and easy to use. And can also be used by a student, freelancer, small industries, big industries. Jupyter also provides you a tool to work with machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Negligible or no cost, Highly efficient, effective, scalable , hasslefree
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook is very attractive platform for new developers to code and to learn programming and perform tasks as compared to other IDE. It has very well and easy visualization, interactive programming and sharing the live code and slideshow is very easy as compare to …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter is still the most well known and widely used platform I've seen. Using it over other competition like Zeppelin simply because of its availability, and my familiarity with its functionality.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook is unique in that it offers a flexible, lightweight, easy-to-replicate way of organizing your code in a visually intuitive fashion that can be exported in a number of formats. I've found that the broad functionalities available within the notebooks suit a lot …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Well, so far Jupyter Notebook has been the better tool for me. It gives us more freedom & has more ability to train ML models & do the data visualization more efficiently. It's easier to operate & has a very simple-to-understand UI & with the support for taking data from …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
I have used PyCharm as well as Jupyter Notebook and for me, Jupyter wins almost every time. I really like its user-friend interface for someone who is new to python programming. The ability to run a big chunk of code part by part is a big game-changer for me. One thing I would …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
It should have cleaner support for multi-environment setup and should also increase the amount of features. Moreover, more support should be present for other programming languages. It should also have the option to set a specific location that opens up whenever I run command …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter is easier to handle and user friendly.

We have free access to it and its cell by cell executing feature is amazing.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook has a nicer interface than RStudio in our opinion and since most of our group is familiar with Jupyter Notebook it has made it a default choice. Overall the interactive programming as well as the easy visualizations, model deployment, and markdown made Jupyter …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook is the core feature extended on by many commercial alternatives. The commercial alternatives have more feature integration with the rest of their portfolio. RStudio is another competitor for interactive and literate programming.

Chose Jupyter Notebook
haven't actually explored as I decided to use it on a friend 's recommendation.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
An interesting thing is that Jupyter Notebook is run on browser environments which may or may not be a positive feature according to cases. VS Code on [the] other hand doesn't use any interface and can run Jupyter Notebooks too. Sometimes my browser consumes too much RAM due to …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better …
Chose Jupyter Notebook
I like Jupyter Notebook over the other two because it keeps my work more organized. It helps me to structure my workflow and the ability to run commands in chunks keeps me from being confused when coming back to the work after some time.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
I selected Jupyter Notebook because this is better integrated with the existing production systems than optional tools (for example, R). It is also commonly used tool within the scientist community.
Chose Jupyter Notebook
When I tried Zeppelin in 2017, it was still in initial versions, Jupyter was way ahead as of then. Zeppelin had limitations and I wasn't confident of it making progress as much as Jupyter.
TensorFlow
Chose TensorFlow
I prefer Pytorch overall, recent models are often only available with pytorch
PyTorch is also easier to use and it is often easier to find support for PyTorch code nowadays than TensorFlow
Also it seems like lots of Google internal resource uses Jax. I mostly uses TensorFlow to …
Chose TensorFlow
TensorFlow has better support for Java compared to PyTorch and is also very well documented.
Chose TensorFlow
Can't seem to choose any deep learning platform in the above, so I'll list it here:
1. Apache MXNet: this has been used for one of our main algorithms for search as an end-to-end pipeline. We chose this because of the Scala bindings, which makes it easier to integrate with out …
Chose TensorFlow
TensorFlow provides a wide range of algorithms with more detail and customization options compared to others. Also, the library is advanced and updates regularly for optimization and new functions.
Chose TensorFlow
Most of the machine learning platforms these days support integration with R and Python libraries. So, the use of reusable libraries is not an issue. TensorFlow performs well in cloud hosting and support for GPU/TPU. However, where it lacks compared to Azure is a graphical …
Chose TensorFlow
Thought about alternatives like scikit-learn, xgboost, pytorch, caffe2, fastai exist, but they don't offer as many tools and functionality as TensorFlow does. It is better to inanest in a eco-system which is very active and well maintained by giants. Being open source, one can …
Chose TensorFlow
Keras is built on top of TensorFlow, but it is much simpler to use and more Python style friendly, so if you don't want to focus on too many details or control and not focus on some advanced features, Keras is one of the best options, but as far as if you want to dig into more, …
Chose TensorFlow

Theano is a Python library and is good for making algorithms from scratch. It is an alternative to Tensor flow. We used tensor flow because it is open source Java source and easy to learn and use.

TensorFlow is developed and maintained by Google. It's the engine behind a lot of …

Chose TensorFlow
There are lots of competitors with this library, but I think TensorFlow is the best thing for deep learning. Although it has a sharp learning curve, it's worth learning. It easy to deploy its model on Android. Keras is very good option too it, easy. In Keras, writing the neural …
Chose TensorFlow
I have used keras and matlab along with this. Also used Caffe and pyTorch sometimes, but all of them are not as powerful as TensorFlow. Keras is in good competition with TensorFlow but Keras won't allow you a lot of customization in your algorithms. And TensorFlow gives you the …
Chose TensorFlow
One major advantage of TensorFlow over Keras and other deep learning libraries is that it is the most powerful. It gives you power to write your own full customised algorithm that is not available in Keras. And it is fast too as compared to another tool as it can perform better …
Chose TensorFlow
I have used Theano to develop machine learning models, like writing the neural network. TensorFlow has reinforcement learning support and lot more algorithms while Theano does come with lots of prebuilt tools. TensorFlow provides data visualisation tools and it is possible to …
Features
Jupyter NotebookTensorFlow
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
7.0
Ratings
18% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Visualization6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.5
Ratings
15% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
9.3
Ratings
10% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Jupyter Notebook
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jupyter NotebookTensorFlow
Small Businesses
IBM Watson Studio
IBM Watson Studio
Score 10.0 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Jupyter NotebookTensorFlow
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Jupyter NotebookTensorFlow
Likelihood to Recommend
I would rate it 9/10 while recommending Jupyter Notebook as it offers me a wide range of functionality to operate. It is very well suited for someone who is new to python programming as the user interface helps you build code line by line. I personally have written multiple programs in Python using Jupyter Notebook as it helps me organize long code by breaking it in a structure. Also the ability to write comments using '#' helps a lot to a reader understand the code.
Read full review
  1. Whenever the problem has the demand for a neural networks based solution, Tensorflow (TF) is a great fit.
  2. The tf.dataset API makes it really simple to create complex data pipelines in a few lines of code.
  3. tf.estimators API abstracts all the complex computation graph creation logic making it very simple to get started.
  4. Eager execution makes it simple to develop a TF graph as debugging the code would be like any other imperative Python program.
  5. TF abstracts all the complexities of scaling it to multiple machines. It has various code and data distribution algorithms ready to use.
  6. Projects like TensorBoard make monitoring the training process really easy. It also gives the ability to view embeddings without any extra code. Their What-If is extremely useful for poking and understanding a black box model. It also has tools to visualize data to quickly check for anomalies.
  7. TF Autograph aims to covert any normal Python code into a distributed program which is quite handy to scale an existing code base.
Read full review
Pros
  • Coding and error correction line by line
  • Simple and Effectiveness
  • Easy to use for visualisation and presentation of code
  • Could be used at any place any time without hassle
Read full review
  • Data pipeline implementation is quite good, loading large amounts of data and pre-process it in an efficient way is no more issue for us
  • It supports all major DL algorithms and network layouts such as ConvNets, RNN, LSTMs, Word2Vec, and even the latest transformer architecture
  • The abstraction for the device is perfectly done and its support seamlessly for multiple GPU and even TPU will bring a lot of performance gain for enterprise scoped solution while still keep the flexibility
  • The TensorBoard is amazing. I haven't seen a similar thing in other frameworks on the market. It allows us to quickly understand and debug the model with the info visualization which makes understanding much better
  • A very supportive community, which is the key for sharing the ideas and find the quick and best solutions
Read full review
Cons
  • Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
  • Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Read full review
  • It would be much better if they could provide good documentation and easy ways to understand concepts.
  • It is difficult to understand the concept behind for example, Tensor Graph, which takes a lot of time.
  • As you have to write everything, it is time consuming to write the implementation of whole neural network. It would be better if they can provide some wrapper library to make things easier.
Read full review
Usability
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
Read full review
Support of multiple components and ease of development.
Read full review
Support Rating
I haven't had a need to contact support. However, all required help is out there in public forums.
Read full review
Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Use of cloud for better execution power is recommended.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Jupyter Notebook is unique in that it offers a flexible, lightweight, easy-to-replicate way of organizing your code in a visually intuitive fashion that can be exported in a number of formats. I've found that the broad functionalities available within the notebooks suit a lot of needs I have for EDA, modeling, and data export that makes other software products fairly redundant.
Read full review
Can't seem to choose any deep learning platform in the above, so I'll list it here: 1. Apache MXNet: this has been used for one of our main algorithms for search as an end-to-end pipeline. We chose this because of the Scala bindings, which makes it easier to integrate with out JVM backend. MXNet seems comparable to TensorFlow, although community support is not as good as TensorFlow, and there are issues with memory leaks that are being worked on. TensorFlow in general is easier to use, but MXNet isn't too far behind. 2. Keras: still a favorite. Often I use this when paired with TensorFlow. TensorFlow 2.0 will make it even easier. 3. PyTorch: only used it a little, so it's hard to provide a good opinion. 4. DL4J: used it initially in an early days project because it has good JVM support. Harder to used not because of poor API design, but because community support is lacking and features don't come out as fast as TensorFlow.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Positive impact: flexible implementation on any OS, for many common software languages
  • Positive impact: straightforward duplication for adaptation of workflows for other projects
  • Negative impact: sometimes encourages pigeonholing of data science work into notebooks versus extending code capability into software integration
Read full review
  • Positive Impact- As I mentioned before its open source. Very easy to learn for average programmer/ developer. We were able to design a POC model for understanding the patient appointment cancellation snd reasons behind it in 3 week time frame.
  • Negative Impact- If you are using tensor flow for small project it works fine. If you are trying to build a model for face recognition it will be hard to program and train the system. It needs data to be processed before hand cannot learn on the go.
Read full review
ScreenShots