Kali Linux vs. Titania Nipper

Kali Linux is especially well suited in environments where high security is needed for your custom developed applications. This is well suited for offensive testing your high security in house developed applications. It is also very good for doing penetration testing on in house developed applications and safe guarding them from external attackers. Kali Linux is tough for use as a day to day Linux operating system as this was never intended to be used by beginners and occasional Linux users.

Incentivized

When critical networking gear, such as a main firewall needs to be quickly audited.

Incentivized

• Analyzing SSL certificates
• Analyzing SSL server configurations
• Vulnerability scanning
• Port scanning

Incentivized

• Easy to use tool, with a low impact in network traffic.
• Support from the vendor (for any enquiries or problems).
• Quick in creating the reports that we need.
• Licensing costs are low in comparison to other solution/vendors.

Incentivized

• Usage wise, it is tough for use by beginners. Can be improved.
• With Kali Linux have noticed driver related issues especially with Nvidia graphics cards.
• Kali Linux can be improved for use as a day to day OS.

Incentivized

• We definitely need support for a wider range of smaller vendors of equipment
• Better summary of conflicting access control lists would help

Incentivized

I would say the number one competitor to Kali is Parrot OS. While they both do the same/similar things, both have over 600 pre-loaded tools. Parrot does use some more offer what may be considered a more intuitive user interface. Parrot OS has been around for longer than people think and still has active development a support. But Kali is used more broadly in Training sessions, demos and is considered to be form all the articles I have read, the gold standard for penetration testing and tool sets

Incentivized

Although Nipper from Titania helps in auditing accurately every device in the network and helps in prioritizing the fixies, it is really useful for the part of the firewall in a network and also for the quick making of reports which are also customizable. But from our experience, the Qualys solution for scanning the networks, although is more costly, it also has more features and options in regards to assessing a network and the elements connected to the network, though it is also somehow less powerful when it comes to creating quick reports. Qualys has a more interface and dashboard approach regarding the results of the scans.

Incentivized

• Initial stages of figuring out back doors in an application hence making them secure.
• ROI is good as it reduces in production security threats by letting us know well in advance.
• Entire development team along with its designers get a huge sigh of relief as all security holes are sealed well in advance before going into production.

Incentivized

• Positive Return on Investment