Kayako vs. Oracle Service

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kayako
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Kayako is a help desk and customer support platform that helps businesses automate workflows, improve agent productivity, and deliver personalized customer experiences across email, chat, and social media.
$79
per month
Oracle Service
Score 5.1 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Service is the help desk and customer experience management platform from Oracle. The technology was developed and supported by RightNow Technologies as RightNow CX for cloud-based call center automation, until that company's acquisition by Oracle in 2011 for about $1.5 billion.N/A
Pricing
KayakoOracle Service
Editions & Modules
Kayako One
$79
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KayakoOracle Service
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KayakoOracle Service
Considered Both Products
Kayako
Chose Kayako
Basecamp is more for client project management and implementations.
Chose Kayako
Jira is much more pricey but more complete. It integrates with our Scrum Board and Agile Software Development platform. So we can much more easily turn Tickets into User Stories, and our techs and devs only have to live in one software platform instead of having to switch …
Chose Kayako
Kayako is way more scalable than Spiceworks' helpdesk offering. We had trouble visualizing our current layout within their environment.

Zendesk was priced quite a bit higher than Kayako while offering similar functionality. It didn't make sense to want to migrate to a new …
Chose Kayako
Kayako's interface is far less complex than Zendesk, so it looked like a good platform. Unfortunately, the features didn't work and their support team is the worst. I went back to Zendesk and I got everything to work including their chat function. Zendesk just works. You don't …
Chose Kayako
Kayako beats the competition with the price but unfortunately loses the battle on all other fronts. Simply not enough options, not enough customisability, very nice and friendly customer support but not the most capable. If the code was less buggy it could be a stronger …
Chose Kayako
Based on cost, Kayako is by far the better solution.
Chose Kayako
Kayako is a great tool for the service industry. I think it is better suited for businesses that do 1-off interactions rather than using it to manage and maintain a larger repeat customer base. This was just our opinion based on the industry we are in. We are in the hosting …
Chose Kayako
We were using Spiceworks for a few years before switching to Kayako but found that it wasn't as customizable or as user friendly for our customers. The SNMP scanning and inventory features with Spiceworks was nice but we needed more of a Help Desk that would allow us to scale …
Chose Kayako
Tried Zen desk and just felt Kayako had many more controllable features.
Chose Kayako
Kayako is the only ticketing system I have used. I found it easy to learn and use.
Chose Kayako
Kayako is the only helpdesk software that I've ever used. In the past we only used a Gmail inbox.
Chose Kayako
This is the only product that I have used for a Help Desk or Case management system
Chose Kayako
We went with Kayako at the time of purchase because there was a much more cost effective self-hosted option that we have been able to leverage to our benefit. That option has become much more expensive now, but we feel like we'd still make the decision again.
Chose Kayako
We only looked at a few. For a small software company, that only wanted to provide better support, it was affordable and easy enough to assimilate into our system.
Chose Kayako
I choose Fusion over OTRS because of the simple nature of the set up and management of Fusion. OTRS required a lot of initial setup and the company was looking for a reliable base system to build onto over time rather than a complex help desk system up front. If you are looking …
Chose Kayako
Kayako's interface is definitely better in the "ease of use" category.

I find that the functionality of Kayako trumps Numara in a few different ways, and the search functions are a little bit easier to navigate.
Chose Kayako
We evaluated Spiceworks and it tried to do too much. Kayako addressed our need for email support and distributing/tracking work without trying to introduce direct monitoring, knowledge base, and all kinds of other tools. It was much simpler to configure for our needs.
Oracle Service
Chose Oracle Service
Ease of use over incident management
Chose Oracle Service
Oracle Service is a powerful service where the customers or clients can be evaluated in-depth. It provides a unified way where the customers can also raise complaints that can further be evaluated or resolved by the monitoring team to enhance the product. Also, it offers a lot …
Chose Oracle Service
Here we have several Oracle stack Products but the new things are hard to integrate. That was the main reason .
Chose Oracle Service
Oracle Service is slightly on the expensive side in terms of pricing but it offers powerful features as well. As compared to Intercom, Oracle Service is suitable for large companies, and the support in the case of Intercom is available only by phone and email while in the case …
Chose Oracle Service
Oracle Service seems to have the advantage of providing many opportunities to companies if they have the right knowledge base. It opened our eyes to what possibilities were afforded to us by exploring the different options that existed. None of the options seemed to be more …
Chose Oracle Service
Oracle Service is the best fit for companies already using other Oracle products. Though Salesforce Service Cloud is equally good in most aspects, Oracle is once again an ecosystem of products like Oracle EBS where seamless integration is possible. Most of our clients were …
Chose Oracle Service
Not sure how to really answer this. We are predominantly a PeopleSoft shop, but that doesn't appear in your list.
Chose Oracle Service
Mainly because of the name Oracle, it's a world leading company backed by a large user community in a broad range of different products. We needed the certainty of good support team behind the product and Oracle could deliver on this much better.
Chose Oracle Service
I have not used or evaluated any other products like Oracle Service Cloud, but I plan to experiment with Salesforce Service Cloud in the near future.
Chose Oracle Service
Java solution would be built from scratch, while the Oracle Service Cloud is SaaS that can be customized to fit the exact needs.
Chose Oracle Service
Oracle Service Cloud offers a wide range of communication channels that optimize and innovate the company's communication process and management with our customers.
Chose Oracle Service
I was not a part of the company when it was selected. Newer software has come out since but OSC had become so integrated with our ecosystem of software that it would be difficult to get rid of now. It has become more of a necessity than a desire to have. If possible down the …
Chose Oracle Service
Oracle is better suited for my company’s needs.
Chose Oracle Service
I was not part of the team to make the selection. I worked as a user of both products, and from that point of view can say that Oracle Service Cloud offers a better GUI.
Chose Oracle Service
Service Cloud seems more agile
Chose Oracle Service
Oracle Service Cloud is easier and more intuitive to use. Help feature is available at every screen.
Chose Oracle Service
We feel the omnichannel elements, in particular, are far superior, and these were important for our needs.
Chose Oracle Service
Worked with PeopleSoft CRM in the past, and the old version of Oracle. I love the current one the most.
Chose Oracle Service
We opted immediately for Service Cloud because we anticipated simple integration with our other Oracle products. We have not achieved integration yet.
Features
KayakoOracle Service
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Kayako
2.0
Ratings
120% below category average
Oracle Service
7.5
Ratings
7% below category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets1.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Expert directory1.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications1.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation1.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Ticket response1.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Product A and Product B
Kayako
1.0
Ratings
155% below category average
Oracle Service
7.3
Ratings
7% below category average
External knowledge base1.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Internal knowledge base1.00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Product A and Product B
Kayako
1.0
Ratings
154% below category average
Oracle Service
7.2
Ratings
8% below category average
Customer portal1.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
IVR1.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Social integration1.00 Ratings4.70 Ratings
Email support1.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Help Desk CRM integration1.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
KayakoOracle Service
Small Businesses
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SysAid
SysAid
Score 9.1 out of 10
SysAid
SysAid
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KayakoOracle Service
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
5.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.8
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.5
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
2.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KayakoOracle Service
Likelihood to Recommend
Kayako is suited for a small company that is just getting started. We are in the web-hosting industry and it was very hard to fully adapt the system the way we would have liked to. Kayako would be very good if you were hosting an ecommerce shop or customer service business where you can look at each customer interaction as separate and not over a long-term period.
Read full review
Oracle Right (Oracle Service Cloud) was an important evolution in the group's ombudsman channel management processes. We brought the Oracle Service Cloud to digitize the processes for capturing and managing the group's ombudsman channel, no longer operating manually (MS Excel).

Oracle Service Cloud (Right Now) brought about an important evolution in the management processes of the group's ombudsman channel, where activities that were performed manually, repetitively and with risk of errors, are now operated by the Right Now platform itself, whether by API, or by automation of the tool.
Read full review
Pros
  • Gives a very good report on an individual level of what is being done for a customer or corporate issue.
  • Easy to understand who has what, what the tickets are about, how long they have been opened and how many times the customer/employee have gone back and forth with each other.
  • Nice dashboard view.
Read full review
  • Oracle Service cloud handles incident management extremely well. It can accept requests from multiple channels. That includes email, website, phone, chat, SMS & some social.
  • Oracle Service cloud provides a knowledge base that can be used by customers or by agents. It can move consumers to self service for most issues. It also has good feedback from customers and agents so that the knowledge can continue to be updated to push people to more self service.
  • Oracle has a good consumer portal that can be used as a website or typically is used in conjunction with a main website as a contact center or help center site. This allows the contact center to manage both the knowledge and the request and the interactions with the customers.
  • Oracle Service cloud is built to provide a turn key solution for CRM/Contact center with some minor configuration. But it also has the ability to be highly customized to meet any companies needs. Much of that work can be done via the configuration options already in the system. It also have a full set of SOAP and Rest APIs for integrating to other systems.
Read full review
Cons
  • I have not tried to use the actual Workflow function for awhile so this issue may have been resolved. When we tried to use it, it was cumbersome and did not offer much flexibility as to meeting the needs of different departments.
  • This may no longer be an issue but if someone was knowledgeable about KQL and knew how another department was set up, they could write a report accessing their data even though they do not have permission to view/edit that departments data.
  • Perhaps adding the function of "Read Receipts" to end-users when opening a ticket.
  • When a ticket is closed, automatically include information from the initial creation of the ticket so the end user knows at a glance what issue has been resolved without looking up the Ticket ID.
Read full review
  • This is only an occasional, user problem; when searching for specific records, at times we receive an error that the maximum size has been exceeded and therefore does not yield any results. This is particularly frustrating when trying to search for a specific street address across several years.
  • I found OPA challenging to use.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I am no longer with the company that was using this, and they were recently bought out by a larger organization that uses an internally developed software suite. It is unlikely for that reason that they will renew or keep any service with Kayako.
Read full review
I give this rating to RightNow because I believe that it's a strong CRM (I know RightNow doesn't like this term) product with virtually limitless possibilities. I like how flexible RightNow is, allowing businesses to fully customize it for their needs. I also like that it's cloud based and doesn't require additional local installation and management.
Read full review
Usability
I did not come from an IT background and I picked this program up quickly
Read full review
The learning curve is fairly steep; but for something that has this much capability, it's nearly impossible to make it "easy". The layout and organization are at least reasonably intuitive. The hardest part-- the "weakest link"-- is the portal development (where you can build help centers and other end-user pages.) The capabilities there are significant, but the learning curve for that part is especially steep and it takes a fair amount of expertise to be able to update it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
They are really good, but it takes a while to get back, because of the large time difference to the Eastern US. However, they are very helpful.
Read full review
We have never had issues with downtime or it not being available. Upgrades and maintenance also happens in weekends or at night.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
We use a lot of tabs and fields on our incident workspace, which should slow the system down, but it's still quite fast, and we continue to optimize whatever is possible.
Read full review
Support Rating
  • We didn't have to use support too much, but when we did, they were able to assist us and help us make everything work.
  • Mostly we used their Online KB and step by step instructions to get all of our issues resolved.
Read full review
Technicians seem to be assessed based solely on how quickly they close the issues. I've had to reopen requests multiple times because they didn't actually solve my problem. Also, when the issue has even a moderate amount of complexity, the technicians often instruct me to "open another SR" to handle the other issue. I'm the customer, I shouldn't have to follow their processes, they should handle that for me. But even when I create the new SR, it seems like their right hand isn't talking to their left - they aren't reading back to the previous issue for context. So I get bounced around a lot, and I have to tell them how to do their job
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Most of our training was given while doing user acceptance testing, and getting the system approved by the market. When ever we were in doubt, our implementer helped us along. Later on we started exploring by our selves.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Three years in we are about as happy with Kayako as we could be. We've had several employee's leave and on-boarding new hires was easier than it has ever been as things are uniform and consistent across the entire application.
Read full review
Work with a RightNow expert during the implementation. Explain features that would you like to have. Often, somebody who really knows the system can show you what you need to do to achieve the desired results. Where a RightNow support engineer or a consultant might say "the system can't do that," a RightNow application engineer will listen to what you need, and often come up with an alternate path to achieve it
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Kayako is way more scalable than Spiceworks' helpdesk offering. We had trouble visualizing our current layout within their environment. Zendesk was priced quite a bit higher than Kayako while offering similar functionality. It didn't make sense to want to migrate to a new platform. We have also evaluated various Sharepoint-based help desks, but their speed and reliability did not match our standards for what a help desk should be.
Read full review
TCS' customers who also selected Oracle Service Cloud over Salesforce Service Cloud and GE's ServiceMax in the Mfg. vertical in which I work, did so because of the robust ability of Oracle Service Cloud and its APIs to integrate with other value-add solutions for manufacturers such as IoT applications, Big Data Analytics, and Field Service applications.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We have never had any down time, slowness or anything. Any error or instability that has occurrred has so far has been caused by user errors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Kayako has helped our business to grow by allowing us to scale our help desk to accommodate more client companies in an efficient manner.
  • Kayako has allowed our customers to have more direct control over their help desk tickets and has made it easier for them to interface directly with our help desk staff.
  • The built-in chat features in Kayako that tie to our main website has allowed prospective customers to chat with our sales teams right away, resulting in more business.
Read full review
  • Automation of campaigns across different channels of communication gives us an overview of our efforts and further boost how we engage our customers
  • The email support help us reach a large number of customer within a short period of time simplifying customer support workflow
  • Attracting more leads and converting them to become potential customers
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Service Screenshots

Screenshot of A pixel-perfect Customer Portal organizes self-service content in a way that makes sense to your customers.Screenshot of Customers can search, email, chat, and call your business from their mobile devices for immediate resolution.Screenshot of Bring omnichannel interactions together into an intuitive, unified agent desktop.Screenshot of A fully integrated knowledge solution is the backbone of all seamless and consistent service experiences.Screenshot of Tailor customer experiences with contextualized and personalized service using dynamic interviews.Screenshot of Predictive forecasting tools increase field service operational efficiencies to ensure timely job completion.