Kayako vs. SAP Service Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kayako
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Kayako is a help desk and customer support platform that helps businesses automate workflows, improve agent productivity, and deliver personalized customer experiences across email, chat, and social media.
$79
per month
SAP Service Cloud
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SAP Service Cloud helps deliver customer value and protect the brand with intelligent customer service. It enables the user to engage with customers at their convenience, connect service with the value chain and deliver greater profitability.N/A
Pricing
KayakoSAP Service Cloud
Editions & Modules
Kayako One
$79
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KayakoSAP Service Cloud
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KayakoSAP Service Cloud
Considered Both Products
Kayako
Chose Kayako
Basecamp is more for client project management and implementations.
Chose Kayako
Jira is much more pricey but more complete. It integrates with our Scrum Board and Agile Software Development platform. So we can much more easily turn Tickets into User Stories, and our techs and devs only have to live in one software platform instead of having to switch …
Chose Kayako
Kayako is way more scalable than Spiceworks' helpdesk offering. We had trouble visualizing our current layout within their environment.

Zendesk was priced quite a bit higher than Kayako while offering similar functionality. It didn't make sense to want to migrate to a new …
Chose Kayako
Kayako's interface is far less complex than Zendesk, so it looked like a good platform. Unfortunately, the features didn't work and their support team is the worst. I went back to Zendesk and I got everything to work including their chat function. Zendesk just works. You don't …
Chose Kayako
Kayako beats the competition with the price but unfortunately loses the battle on all other fronts. Simply not enough options, not enough customisability, very nice and friendly customer support but not the most capable. If the code was less buggy it could be a stronger …
Chose Kayako
Based on cost, Kayako is by far the better solution.
Chose Kayako
Kayako is a great tool for the service industry. I think it is better suited for businesses that do 1-off interactions rather than using it to manage and maintain a larger repeat customer base. This was just our opinion based on the industry we are in. We are in the hosting …
Chose Kayako
We were using Spiceworks for a few years before switching to Kayako but found that it wasn't as customizable or as user friendly for our customers. The SNMP scanning and inventory features with Spiceworks was nice but we needed more of a Help Desk that would allow us to scale …
Chose Kayako
Tried Zen desk and just felt Kayako had many more controllable features.
Chose Kayako
Kayako is the only ticketing system I have used. I found it easy to learn and use.
Chose Kayako
Kayako is the only helpdesk software that I've ever used. In the past we only used a Gmail inbox.
Chose Kayako
This is the only product that I have used for a Help Desk or Case management system
Chose Kayako
We went with Kayako at the time of purchase because there was a much more cost effective self-hosted option that we have been able to leverage to our benefit. That option has become much more expensive now, but we feel like we'd still make the decision again.
Chose Kayako
We only looked at a few. For a small software company, that only wanted to provide better support, it was affordable and easy enough to assimilate into our system.
Chose Kayako
I choose Fusion over OTRS because of the simple nature of the set up and management of Fusion. OTRS required a lot of initial setup and the company was looking for a reliable base system to build onto over time rather than a complex help desk system up front. If you are looking …
Chose Kayako
Kayako's interface is definitely better in the "ease of use" category.

I find that the functionality of Kayako trumps Numara in a few different ways, and the search functions are a little bit easier to navigate.
Chose Kayako
We evaluated Spiceworks and it tried to do too much. Kayako addressed our need for email support and distributing/tracking work without trying to introduce direct monitoring, knowledge base, and all kinds of other tools. It was much simpler to configure for our needs.
SAP Service Cloud
Chose SAP Service Cloud
It had better backed integration with SAP S/4HANA and had less overall cost of ownership and standard and less cost invite involved for integration
Chose SAP Service Cloud
Zoho Desk is the ultimate software for clear communication, but when we compared these two according to our needs, we found out that SAP Service Cloud is the best option for us. Since it provides everything in one location, Zoho Desk is somewhat lacking in this area. That was …
Chose SAP Service Cloud
SAP C4C was selected to reduce the cost that they had with Salesforce.
Chose SAP Service Cloud
Salesforce Service Cloud
Chose SAP Service Cloud
customizations for zendesk are complicated and its expensive as compared to the features they are providing.
Chose SAP Service Cloud
After analyzing several business intelligence solutions, we conclude that SAP Service Cloud is the winner. Our analysts can predict potential defaults with unprecedented accuracy, so there is a proactive approach to financial risk management.
Chose SAP Service Cloud
the user interface is much better, but most importantly the ability to integrate the tool with sap 4 hana easily
Chose SAP Service Cloud
SAP Service Cloud came out cheaper and tied in a lot better with out other SAP products. It was well established and the logic within the product made it a consistent and well structured solution compared to Salesforce.
Salesforce did offer easy flexibility in customisation and …
Chose SAP Service Cloud
Service cloud is faster than Salesforce. Smooth configuration.
Chose SAP Service Cloud
Since we already had SAP sales cloud V1, it was logical for us to enable service capabilities in the same tenant. (no additional effort for the integration and change management for the users).
Chose SAP Service Cloud
During evaluation , we found sap service cloud is better in all aspects especially ease to use.
Chose SAP Service Cloud
Freshdesk is a lightweight service system that allows a small team to start handling service interactions quickly, in a professional manner. However, our observation was that it does not scale to Enterprise-level and does not have the same level of integration, customisability, …
Chose SAP Service Cloud
Platform and interface looks so cool in SAP Service Cloud also the license part when compared to the other players in the market, DDA was impressive, pricing is reasonable when compared to other vendors and the timeline for the implementation is less when compared, flexibility …
Chose SAP Service Cloud
SAP Service Cloud's system works better because in case we have any issues we are easily able to connect with the SPOC and get our issues resolved. Whereas with the other system it takes us time to connect and get a resolution. Also our agents are more comfortable using SAP …
Chose SAP Service Cloud
We select this service because we already have deploy Sap Business One. The other services works great, but lack in compliance and security that we need it at the time. In term of pricing is more expensive but far more robust. We attent thousand of people and uptime should be …
Chose SAP Service Cloud
We evaluated 4-5 software and also thought of building one in-house but after a thorough evaluation, we decided to go ahead with SAP Service Cloud. SAP Service Cloud met our integration requirements better than the other products we evaluated. While the pricing could be a bit …
Chose SAP Service Cloud
Compared to Salesforce Service Cloud and Zendesk Support, SAP Service Cloud offered deeper customization tailored to our specific needs, especially for banking. While Salesforce had broad features and Zendesk boasted user-friendliness, SAP provided a balance of both, aligned …
Chose SAP Service Cloud
AI features are behind what Microsoft offers in its Dynamics 365 Customer Service, but as we already had other SAP products, the integration was easier with SAP Service Cloud. Implementation time was a key aspect of our project.
Chose SAP Service Cloud
Zoho Analytics, F5 on IBM Cloud and Microsoft 365 Business Premium
Chose SAP Service Cloud
Salesforce has many integrations available, but configuring and setting them up can be difficult and necessitate development experience. While SAP Service Cloud integrates well with ease and without any difficulties.
Chose SAP Service Cloud
SAP Service Cloud provides entry level licence pricing that small and medium businesses can afford, while Salesforce license pricing tends to be really high even in small start scenarios.
SAP Service Cloud also provides enough basic features as a standalone solution, whereas …
Features
KayakoSAP Service Cloud
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Kayako
2.0
Ratings
120% below category average
SAP Service Cloud
-
Ratings
Organize and prioritize service tickets1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Expert directory1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Ticket response1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Product A and Product B
Kayako
1.0
Ratings
155% below category average
SAP Service Cloud
-
Ratings
External knowledge base1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledge base1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Product A and Product B
Kayako
1.0
Ratings
154% below category average
SAP Service Cloud
-
Ratings
Customer portal1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
IVR1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Social integration1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email support1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Help Desk CRM integration1.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
KayakoSAP Service Cloud
Small Businesses
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Simplify360
Simplify360
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dialpad Support
Dialpad Support
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SysAid
SysAid
Score 9.1 out of 10
Verint Community
Verint Community
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KayakoSAP Service Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.8
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
2.1
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KayakoSAP Service Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Kayako is suited for a small company that is just getting started. We are in the web-hosting industry and it was very hard to fully adapt the system the way we would have liked to. Kayako would be very good if you were hosting an ecommerce shop or customer service business where you can look at each customer interaction as separate and not over a long-term period.
Read full review
SAP Service Cloud is well suited with its omni-channel capabilities giving the possibility to collect service requests from different channels like phone, e-mail or CTI telephony. It also has nice User Interface (when it comes to desktop version). On the other hand SAP Service Cloud needs to be definitiely improved in terms of mobile app, which is horrible and it has limited development possibilities.
Read full review
Pros
  • Gives a very good report on an individual level of what is being done for a customer or corporate issue.
  • Easy to understand who has what, what the tickets are about, how long they have been opened and how many times the customer/employee have gone back and forth with each other.
  • Nice dashboard view.
Read full review
  • First is It is highly effective when we consider Customer Relation Engagement.
  • Good User Interface by which anyone can get used to it quickly.
  • It is providing infinite opportunity of integration with other SAP solutions.
  • Affordable Solutions with effective features.
  • It has prebuilt charts which helps us to define customer journey with ease of efforts.
Read full review
Cons
  • I have not tried to use the actual Workflow function for awhile so this issue may have been resolved. When we tried to use it, it was cumbersome and did not offer much flexibility as to meeting the needs of different departments.
  • This may no longer be an issue but if someone was knowledgeable about KQL and knew how another department was set up, they could write a report accessing their data even though they do not have permission to view/edit that departments data.
  • Perhaps adding the function of "Read Receipts" to end-users when opening a ticket.
  • When a ticket is closed, automatically include information from the initial creation of the ticket so the end user knows at a glance what issue has been resolved without looking up the Ticket ID.
Read full review
  • Integrating SAP Service Cloud with non-SAP systems can be challenging, i faced some hurdles when my IT team took 3 months to integrate the billing data from some other vendor and the system would run slow if you try to pull billing data
  • Slow loading of the pages as compared to other consumer tech softwares we use
  • Implementation costs and complexity of implementation makes it an option only for large enterprises with huge IT teams (and it can take a few months to implement)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I am no longer with the company that was using this, and they were recently bought out by a larger organization that uses an internally developed software suite. It is unlikely for that reason that they will renew or keep any service with Kayako.
Read full review
Now all our critical processes are streamlined & would like to explore the new feature to have user friendly experiences
Read full review
Usability
I did not come from an IT background and I picked this program up quickly
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
They are really good, but it takes a while to get back, because of the large time difference to the Eastern US. However, they are very helpful.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
  • We didn't have to use support too much, but when we did, they were able to assist us and help us make everything work.
  • Mostly we used their Online KB and step by step instructions to get all of our issues resolved.
Read full review
I have found that sometimes issues reported to the SAP takes more time also they lack system support with respect to the priority . Also we don't see RCA for the issues raised. Also turn around time for the issues is not fixed as the support is global sometimes the issues float here and there.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Three years in we are about as happy with Kayako as we could be. We've had several employee's leave and on-boarding new hires was easier than it has ever been as things are uniform and consistent across the entire application.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Kayako is way more scalable than Spiceworks' helpdesk offering. We had trouble visualizing our current layout within their environment. Zendesk was priced quite a bit higher than Kayako while offering similar functionality. It didn't make sense to want to migrate to a new platform. We have also evaluated various Sharepoint-based help desks, but their speed and reliability did not match our standards for what a help desk should be.
Read full review
Zoho Desk is the ultimate software for clear communication, but when we compared these two according to our needs, we found out that SAP Service Cloud is the best option for us. Since it provides everything in one location, Zoho Desk is somewhat lacking in this area. That was the reason for choosing SAP Service Cloud.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Kayako has helped our business to grow by allowing us to scale our help desk to accommodate more client companies in an efficient manner.
  • Kayako has allowed our customers to have more direct control over their help desk tickets and has made it easier for them to interface directly with our help desk staff.
  • The built-in chat features in Kayako that tie to our main website has allowed prospective customers to chat with our sales teams right away, resulting in more business.
Read full review
  • After implementing SAP Service Cloud, we've noticed a noticeable drop in the average time it takes to resolve customer queries. Centralized communication and an efficient ticketing system enable our team to respond faster and more effectively.
  • Our customer feedback scores have improved since using the platform. The integrated knowledge base has particularly empowered our team to provide immediate solutions to common queries, elevating the overall customer experience.
  • The platform has streamlined our operations and reduced manual interventions, leading to decreased operational costs related to customer service. Automation features and AI integrations minimize repetitive tasks, allowing our team to tackle more complex customer concerns.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Service Cloud Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of