| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 KeldairHR | Score7 out of 10 | N/A | Hyrell is a cloud-based applicant tracking system. Its capabilities include batch or mass communication with potential candidates via multiple channels like email, social recruiting, and job boards, employee screening and testing, resume parsing, data management, and analytics. | $299 per month |
| KeldairHR | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | Pay for the number of open positions you plan to have and you get unlimited users, all the core features, unlimited applicants, and unlimited storage. | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| KeldairHR | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose KeldairHR Hyrell was much easier to use, cheaper and the support from the team has been outstanding. When this was launched, we had each of our managers attend an online webinar. If they were unable to view this, then there have been monthly training sessions available as well as … Chose KeldairHR I have viewed demos for several different Applicant Tracking Systems, and Hyrell was the winner every time. One of our requirements was ease of use (If our managers struggle with functionality, they will not use it). Anyone with basic computer skills can use Hyrell....it's that … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose KeldairHR Pricing was more reasonable, interface was more user-friendly and had all of the features we were looking for in an ATS system, and representatives were less pushy and more focused on meeting business needs. Chose KeldairHR As stated before
in a previous question. I get a good number of competing companies calling me
each month attempting to obtain our company as a partner. When I explain to the Chose KeldairHR Hyrell came up against ClearFit and ZipRecruiter. ClearFit looked very strong, but ultimately its pay per posting model didn't provide enough cost certainty. ZipRecruiter seems to be a strong player too. There was a lot of flash with ZipRecruiter but the product didn't seem as … Chose KeldairHR We used Jobing prior to learning about Hyrell to post our positions. There was no way to evaluate candidate answers in Jobing and we found that Hyrell was a much more all encompassing system and relatively user-friendly for us to use. I am very happy with Hyrell and have no … Chose KeldairHR Hyrell was the first online hiring system my company had used, but we have never felt the need to look elsewhere! Chose KeldairHR There are many applicant tracking systems out there. Many were too big, involved and complex (expensive) for a small company hiring at one location. I tried out several other systems; Hyrell was the cleanest interface, most intuitive and offered better functionality than the … Chose KeldairHR This is the first product of this kind that I have experience using. |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
No answers on this topic | |
| KeldairHR | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting / ATS |
|
| KeldairHR | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 |
| Usability | 8.5 |
| Availability | 9.1 |
| Performance | 7.5 |
| Support Rating | 9.1 |
| In-Person Training | 9.1 |
| Online Training | 9.1 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 |
| Configurability | 7.6 |
| Ease of integration | 5.3 |
| Product Scalability | 8.9 |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.1 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.1 |
