TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Progress Kendo UI vs. Progress Telerik

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Progress Kendo UI

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AKendo UI is a JavaScript UI toolkit that allows users to build responsive web-based apps integrated into their framework of choice (jQuery, Angular, React, or Vue). The vendor’s value proposition is that Kendo UI offers a large library of popular and configurable components ranging from sophisticated grids and charts to basic buttons, so users don’t have to waste development time building their UI. The vendor also says the large library of customizable themes means users can easily deploy a…

    $999

    per developer, royalty-free

    Progress Telerik

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AWith Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins and customization options, Telerik users report cutting development time by up to 50 percent. Web

    $999

    per developer, royalty-free

    Pricing
    Progress Kendo UIProgress Telerik
    Editions & Modules
    Kendo UI with Priority Support
    $999
    per developer, royalty-free
    DevCraft UI
    $1,299
    per developer, royalty-free
    DevCraft Complete
    $1,499
    per developer, royalty-free
    DevCraft Ultimate
    $2,199
    per developer, royalty-free
    Individual Product Licence
    $999
    per developer, royalty-free
    DevCraft UI
    $1,299
    per developer, royalty-free
    DevCraft Complete
    $1,499
    per developer, royalty-free
    DevCraft Ultimate
    $2,199
    per developer, royalty-free
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Progress Kendo UIProgress Telerik
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Progress Kendo UIProgress Telerik
    Considered Both Products
    Progress Software
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We used to use Component One but changed over to Telerik controls because they seemed to stay on top of the industry trends and the pricing was reasonable. The implementation was easy and the developers all voted for Telerik. We even used their reporting engine as well. The …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We have experienced working with Telerik UI tool set from 2002, KENDO UI born 2011 it has built 100% Javascript like a Telerik UI is a 100% Web Tool. Because this tool was born in 2002 before their competitors then Progress has a lot of experience around of this kind of tools. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Telerik ASP.NET controls have a significant advantage over DevExpress -- automated web tests, rich API for testing web pages containing Telerik controls. Telerik also has less strict license terms: - Telerik software is licensed on a per-seat basis - DevExpress software is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Telerik ASP.NET Controls are still more feature rich than Kendo UI, so I prefer to use them wherever possible. Open source controls are used only for special scenarios.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Actually, I did not try any other. When I arrived Kendo was already a standard tool in the organization.
    Outside of ALS, I've had contact with other web suits from Telerik and also from SyncFusion.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We selected Kendo UI because we were using Telerik controls already, and Kendo was included in our license. Other than that we have found the package mature enough to support our workflows which include some tricky scenarios: file upload, text editor, grids with grouping and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We selected Kendo UI because of the customizability and the breadth of the offering.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Kendo UI provides more features and rich UI than other libraries.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    New components and integrations
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We looked at Onsen UI, but it doesn't compare to Kendo.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Kendo UI stacks up greatly against other controls libraries like JQWidget and so on. It may be more expensive, but with what your getting from Kendo UI I can understand it (I still wish it was a little less expensive). But Kendo UI controls look and function better, and are …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    I felt that all three of these offerings were close, but Kendo seemed to be a little easier to work with inside our Node/Angular environment!
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We worked with Telerik since 2011. At first we used their controls for Silverlight and with time we continued using their tools like Kendo UI since we had positive experiences. In the beginning we took Telerik tools on a trial basis, and after a test period we liked their …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    One of our partner companies is using Kendo UI for jQuery. In order to exploit synergies with our partner we selected Telerik Kendo UI for jQuery. Other selection criterias were a) the longevity of Telerik, b) the Support, c) the Performance and d) the scalability.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    No other. Before Kendo I used various open source jquery plugins and Telerik's Ajax platform. Telerik's Ajax was a component for old asp.net forms. Jquery was alternative which was better connected with ASP.NET MVC pattern. But none of this framework provides functionality like …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Directly at the begging of Telerik, we choose Telerik as our main component solution. When Telerik added Kendo to the family of their products we made a decision to słowy move out from ASP.NET Ajax to Kendo UI. After a long time, we see that it was a very good decision and we …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    KendoUI was selected due to previous experience on Telerik products and Angular2 support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Infragistics. We currently have an active license, but are using Kendo UI much more. The documentation and examples ultimately made the difference in deciding where to expend our efforts. There is only so much time in the day to spend trying to learn new products. We will put …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We haven't used any other products - never needed to.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    I think that this was case of luck - we downloaded Kendo UI stack and immediately after initial test that was it. No further chargeable components were used but we use some of free components coming through Bootstrap templates like Dropzone, Switch and few more. Overall we do …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We use Telerik's Kendo UI for AJAX, MVC and jQuery. Now that we're venturing into Angular some colleagues want to use the Angular set of components.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Kendo UI provided a better feature rich set of tested controls as well as fanatical support that is unmatched.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We went with Kendo after evaluating the different options because Telerik has a good reputation in the .Net developer world, and the initial review showed that Kendo would be easier to use and look better with minimal effort on our part. In the end it came down to the fact …
    Incentivized
    Progress Software
    Chose Progress Telerik
    Telerik UI for Blazor is much more usable than Kendo UI. I was never a fan of Kendo UI, but I like using Telerik UI For Blazor due to the ease of implementation for the components.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Telerik
    We have been implementing our own custom code using the ASP.NET framework, and it has taken us a lot longer to implement functionality. When we transitioned to using Progress Telerik UI components, it exponentially sped up our development time and improved the look of our …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    Progress Kendo UIProgress Telerik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (177 ratings)
    10.0
    (41 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.8
    (21 ratings)
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (38 ratings)
    9.5
    (27 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.5
    (38 ratings)
    9.3
    (28 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.1
    (9 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)