Kiteworks vs. MX Layer

MX Layer

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Kiteworks	Score 9.5 out of 10	N/A	Kiteworks empowers organizations to manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance. With on-premise, private cloud, hybrid and FedRAMP deployment…	$15 per user/month
MX Layer	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	MX Layer is an enterprise security company based in the United States, focusing on providing cloud-based solutions for email security, business continuity, data loss prevention and email archiving services. MX Layer aims to ensure that their comprehensive email security platform protects company's critical communications at all times. Its web-based interface is used to control inbound and outbound email traffic, protecting employees and customers from ever-evolving threats such as spam,…	N/A

Pricing

Kiteworks

MX Layer

Editions & Modules

Business: $15
per user/month
Enterprise: Custom Pricing

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Kiteworks	MX Layer
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

- Essentials (free): For professionals or companies looking for a convenient and easy to use security solution. - Pro (30 days free trial): For small and medium size businesses with less than 100 employees with outbound features. - Business (30 days free trial): For organizations need advanced security and management features with outbound.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Kiteworks	MX Layer
Considered Both Products	Kiteworks Verified User Anonymous Chose Kiteworks The main reason for selecting Kiteworks is that when sharing files with multiple customers, each customer has no idea who the other customers are. To do that in Teams would require users to create a private team for each customer, which would be very [time-consuming]. Incentivized Helpful?	MX Layer No answer on this topic

Features

Kiteworks

MX Layer

Secure Email Gateway

Comparison of Secure Email Gateway features of Product A and Product B
	Kiteworks - Ratings	MX Layer 9.4 Ratings 12% above category average
Anti-malware	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Customizability	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Data Loss Protection	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings
Threat Detection	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Sandboxing	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
End-to-End Encryption	00 Ratings	10.00 Ratings
Management Tools	00 Ratings	8.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Kiteworks	MX Layer
Small Businesses	SugarSync Score 5.8 out of 10	Zoho Mail Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10	Avanan Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises	M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10	Avanan Score 9.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Kiteworks	MX Layer
Likelihood to Recommend	9.5 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Kiteworks	MX Layer
Likelihood to Recommend	We are sending some pools securely via Kiteworks. Sharing and receiving secure files from 3rd party users and tracking files are very simple. Kiteworks solved compliance and security issues. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Its modules predominantly function via the cloud, rendering it exceptionally convenient for users. Its design based on the cloud liberates us from the burden of upkeeping the infrastructure. Burkay Yapagcioglu Consultant Read full review
Pros	Microsoft Office Plugins Desktop Synchronization Mobile Ability Group chat File Filtering Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Encrypting our files appears to be less than 100% complete Software updates cannot be scheduled to take place automatically like their old product Detailed activity logging is not available to administrators. You must submit the logs to Accellion for analysis. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	The main reason for selecting Kiteworks is that when sharing files with multiple customers, each customer has no idea who the other customers are. To do that in Teams would require users to create a private team for each customer, which would be very [time-consuming]. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	We have tried to move to other products but our users will have nothing of that. We migrated from the Accellion MFT product with relative ease. We have less than 100 users, using over 1.5 TB of space, so it's a very popular product. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Kiteworks Screenshots