Kiteworks vs. SendSafely

Kiteworks

Kiteworks

6 Reviews and Ratings

SendSafely

SendSafely

0 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Kiteworks	Score 9.5 out of 10	N/A	Kiteworks empowers organizations to manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance. With on-premise, private cloud, hybrid and FedRAMP deployment…	$15 per user/month
SendSafely	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	SendSafely headquartered in New York operates a zero knowledge, end-to-end encrypted file exchange platform. At the core of its platform is the SendSafely API, which integrates with popular operational platforms like Gmail, Outlook, Zapier, Salesforce, and Zendesk.	$10 per month

Pricing

Kiteworks

SendSafely

Editions & Modules

Business: $15
per user/month
Enterprise: Custom Pricing

Basic: $10
per month
Pro: $20
per month
Business/Enterprise: $100
per month

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Kiteworks	SendSafely
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Kiteworks	SendSafely
Considered Both Products	Kiteworks Verified User Anonymous Chose Kiteworks The main reason for selecting Kiteworks is that when sharing files with multiple customers, each customer has no idea who the other customers are. To do that in Teams would require users to create a private team for each customer, which would be very [time-consuming]. Incentivized Helpful?	SendSafely No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Kiteworks	SendSafely
Small Businesses	SugarSync Score 5.8 out of 10	SugarSync Score 5.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10	M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises	M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10	M‑Files Score 8.9 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Kiteworks	SendSafely
Likelihood to Recommend	9.5 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Kiteworks	SendSafely
Likelihood to Recommend	We are sending some pools securely via Kiteworks. Sharing and receiving secure files from 3rd party users and tracking files are very simple. Kiteworks solved compliance and security issues. Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Microsoft Office Plugins Desktop Synchronization Mobile Ability Group chat File Filtering Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Encrypting our files appears to be less than 100% complete Software updates cannot be scheduled to take place automatically like their old product Detailed activity logging is not available to administrators. You must submit the logs to Accellion for analysis. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	The main reason for selecting Kiteworks is that when sharing files with multiple customers, each customer has no idea who the other customers are. To do that in Teams would require users to create a private team for each customer, which would be very [time-consuming]. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	We have tried to move to other products but our users will have nothing of that. We migrated from the Accellion MFT product with relative ease. We have less than 100 users, using over 1.5 TB of space, so it's a very popular product. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots	Kiteworks Screenshots