KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus vs. Splunk Enterprise Security

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
PhishER is presented as a lightweight Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) platform to orchestrate threat response and manage the high volume of potentially malicious email messages reported by users. And, with automatic prioritization of emails, PhishER helps InfoSec and Security Operations team cut through the inbox noise and respond to the most dangerous threats more quickly.
$0.75
per month (billed annually) per seat
Splunk Enterprise Security
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Splunk Enterprise Security is an analytics-driven SIEM that helps to combat threats with actionable intelligence and advanced analytics at scale.N/A
Pricing
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER PlusSplunk Enterprise Security
Editions & Modules
3001-5000 Monthly Pricing Per Seat
$0.75
per month (billed annually) per seat
2001-3000 Monthly Pricing Per Seat
$0.85
per month (billed annually) per seat
1001-2000 Monthly Pricing Per Seat
$1.00
per month (billed annually) per seat
501-1000 Monthly Pricing Per Seat
$1.15
per month (billed annually) per seat
101-500 Monthly Pricing Per Seat
$1.50
per month (billed annually) per seat
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER PlusSplunk Enterprise Security
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER PlusSplunk Enterprise Security
Considered Both Products
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
We evaluated the Titan options because we have already used their DNS filtering product. However, KnowBe4 came in with a better price per user and a significantly stronger product lineup, particularly with its security awareness training component.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Hands down superior
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Email customization looks like a carbon copy. Layout is more convoluted. We would have to purchase three separate elements to achieve what we get with KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus at double/triple the cost. The KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus product lineup is better, more …
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Only tool that has features like rip and flip
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
KnowBe4's PhishER was the deciding factor for us.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Harmony does not provide security awareness training or simulated phishing emails like KnowB4. However, it does provide a phish alert button & workflow similar to PhishER & we may stop using PhishER because the Phish Alert reports from PhishER don't feed into Harmony to help …
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
None of the other security awareness applications we used or considered offered a similar product to PhishER or their overall security awareness application was so subpar that we didn't even consider if they had an option similar to PhishER.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
No comparison in their capabilities.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus had a better user interface and a greater option for growth
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
We decided on KnowBe4 PhishER to make our response process smoother and cut down on the time and effort needed to handle threats. We wanted to reduce manual work and focus our team on real threats. PhishER’s fast analysis and response were key in our decision. Overall, …
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
we have not looked at other products
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Our organization has always solely trusted KnowBe4.
Recommended by our outside IT vendor- they continuously do random research on other similar products and time and time again, find KnowBe4 to be the best out there for value and product
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Arctic Wolf also offers a similar product to PhishER using their Phish Tell engine. However, it was severely lacking in terms of workflow automation. Switching to Arctic Wolf's email reporting and response product would have increased the number of manual hours spent on email …
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Microsoft's backed in email reporting tool is good but the time to resolution varies for all messages. It claims that it will help train filters to better classify messages into the tenant, but we have not seen much of that.

Barracuda offered a similar product to PhishER but …
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Some other providers offer similar training but have found Phisher tends to be where we get the most value compared to other products
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
We researched several, however, KnowBe4 was our first choice and we've been with them since the beginning of our time with these types of products.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
Abnormal is on an entirely nother level both in cost and functionality. Costs is 25x but is borderline magic. Barracuda was finicky and cost more. Defender for email we already had but falls short in a lot of areas, especially with the reporting piece.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
We use the two tools in parallel to ensure that we can effectively manage and report on Phishing and further enhance our training campaigns.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
We liked the integration and ease of use.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
PhishER is an add-on to the email client which makes it easy to setup and readily available to use for all staff. Other products require much more indepth setup and can be confusing for untrained staff. PhishER is easy to use for all staff and this encourages staff to use it …
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
I think that KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus is better than Huntress by precisely telling you in real time what your other defenses are missing. Encourage targeted, just-in-time training against actual threats. Provides evidence and data to demonstrate a true risk reduction.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
We view KnowBe4 PhishER as another piece to the security puzzle. It works well alongside the other security applications and services in use at our organization.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
We only have evaluated and/or used PhishER since it is a part of the complete KnowB4 package that we subscribe to.
Chose KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
KnowBe4 PhishER requires less hands-on involvement from our small (but mighty) IT team. Threats are alleviated quickly without our team having to drop something important that they are working on to respond to a phishing email.
Splunk Enterprise Security
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
LogRhythm is good for a team comprising mostly non-technical IT users. Unlike Splunk, it has a GUI log search and a good ticketing system. Splunk is better than Logrhythm for me as it provides me with the ultimate flexibility to write custom queries. Scalyr is a good tool and …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF), Juniper Mist Edge, Wazuh
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
I did not choose this product. Overall although I like ES, I think Sentinel in certain ways is the superior product. The Kusto Query language is a lot easier to use. For instance anything that requires manual parsing in query can be more difficult with this product. Also some …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) is much faster and easier to integrate logs and work on alerts to detect suspicious security events.
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
AlienVault is much more user and beginner friendly, however Splunk ES very much so provides more capability for mass data manipulation, report and dashboard customization, and trend analytics.
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
These two really helps in better way and low cost and high productivity. Automatic detection ML help you to detect many ways and create cases based on risk score
GRS UBA helps to protect organization from data ,via sharing through emails and USB s .
Gurucu product license once …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk enterprise is the only solution that we’ve been able to identify that provides risk based alerting, which allows our SOC to reduce analyst fatigue which would be a huge problem without it. Before RBA, there were thousands of alerts a day and it was impossible to review …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
I believe it is definitely a leader in the security space
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
I consider Splunk Enterprise Security to have the strongest deployment methodology and troubleshoot features. Other products also provide good solutions such as Riverbed, Broadcom and Solarwinds but I think Splunk Enterprise Security is a great and trustable option to use for …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Even though Splunk ES is not the cheapest solution on the markt, we found it was still cheaper compared to Secureworks we had before. Also the level of flexibility and "thinking with the customer" is much better now.
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Traditional hardware logging mechanisms do not provide in-depth research data on the threats and signatures, while Splunk Enterprise Security could easily achieve this feat.
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
FortiAnalzer is a hardware solution, but with Splunk, we could identify as well get the correct solution for the active threats and too with accurate and precise detailing.
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
- Schema on the fly indexing --> Gives you faster index searches. Even if you use Datamodes, it's 100x time faster as well.
- Correlation with other domains easily gives you total visibility and reduces the time to investigate and understand the problem.
- With lookups and trust, …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Securonix does not nearly meet the scale, extensibility, and maturity that Splunk ES offers. However, when looking at the MSP architecture options, Securonix is a much more flexible platform for multi-tenanting. So, Splunk ES for captive SOC platforms and Securonix for …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk ES is by far the best solution in the market as per flexibility, features and support. Cost-wise, it is the most expensive option to go with, but that has its own advantages as the product that we get is premium and superior to other SIEM. The best thing about Spunk ES …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise Security allows for data normalization that does not compare to other SIEMs such as QRadar or Trustwave. QRadar requires custom dsm parsers before the data can be onboarded. I appreciate that Splunk Enterprise Security can ingest any source of data and …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
All Splunk products are easy to integrate, and they collaborate in the security of our organization.
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
N/A - Have only used Splunk Enterprise Security since coming to Deloitte
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
LogRhythm is a superior SIEM from a purely security/SOC perspective in my opinion. However, Splunk shines if you have an expert behind the wheel or if the organization is quite large - as my experience with LogRhythm indicated it couldn't handle large-size organizations.
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk does not hide its correlation and analytics logic from users as much as other solutions in the same space. While some features are harder to access the underlying information is all accessible and tunable. This gives Splunk an edge over other solutions that lock the …
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
We have both of these instances in our organization.
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk enterprise security works great in Splunk Cloud.
Chose Splunk Enterprise Security
Splunk Enterprise Security is superior in the logging aspect and searching. That’s why it was easier to pick switch to Splunk Enterprise Security. Arcsight is however superior in the correlation and stability aspect. It’s very reliable and stable that we sometimes forget that …
Features
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER PlusSplunk Enterprise Security
Incident Response Platforms
Comparison of Incident Response Platforms features of Product A and Product B
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
8.7
Ratings
1% below category average
Splunk Enterprise Security
-
Ratings
Company-wide Incident Reporting8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Other Security Systems8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Dashboard8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Machine Learning to Prevent Incidents8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Live Response for Rapid Remediation8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus
-
Ratings
Splunk Enterprise Security
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Correlation00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Deployment flexibility00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Data integration/API management00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER PlusSplunk Enterprise Security
Small Businesses
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.8 out of 10
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
LevelBlue USM Anywhere
Score 3.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER PlusSplunk Enterprise Security
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.3
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.2
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER PlusSplunk Enterprise Security
Likelihood to Recommend
PhishER comes with some good features, such as PhishML, PhishRIP, PhishFlip, etc. These features help us manage phishing email reporting incidents. From reporting emails via Phish Alert Button plug-in to collecting all reported emails in one place at the PhishER dashboard. Now, the PhishML comes into play, scanning all reported emails and tagging each as clean, spam, or threat. With the help of this machine learning-based algorithm, our investigation process becomes easier. Other features, such as PhishRip, help to search and quarantine phishing emails, and PhishFlip converts a real phishing campaign to a test phishing campaign.
Read full review
Well-Suited Scenarios:
Real-Time Threat Response: ES excels in swiftly detecting and responding to security threats through data correlation.
Compliance Management: ES streamlines compliance with detailed logs and reports, ideal for regulated industries.
User Behavior Analytics: Effective in monitoring user and entity behavior, particularly for insider threat detection.
Large-Scale Environments: Valuable for organizations with diverse data sources and high volumes of data.
Incident Investigation: ES aids in post-incident analysis, reconstructing events to understand root causes.
Less Appropriate Scenarios:
Smaller Organizations: For simpler setups, ES may be complex and costly.
Static Environments: In low-risk settings, ES's advanced features may be unnecessary.
Limited Resources: Tight budgets or sparse IT resources may hinder effective ES use.
Lack of In-House Expertise: Without security experts, optimizing ES can be challenging.
Budget Constraints: ES may be cost-prohibitive for budget-conscious organizations, prompting consideration of more affordable alternatives.
Read full review
Pros
  • Well structured KMSAT, PAB is a great addition.
  • Good Training Library, ability to customize templates
  • Phish/ER opens a windows to types & volume of suspect emails and allows admins to act upon.
  • "Rooms" in Phish/ER, to me, is considered my entry point to start my admin duties.
  • PAB and Phish/ER work very well together.
  • KnowBe4 Learner App is a great addition.
Read full review
  • Its best feature is its user interface, which is easy to navigate and understand. All you need is a little tutorial on how to use the Splunk query language and you're done.
  • Logs can be easily uploaded or shared across multiple platforms and display a highly insightful graphical representations of data using graphs, tables, and many other formats.
Read full review
Cons
  • Issues with Global Blocklist
  • Email Template Modification - Simplification
  • Target Specific Users vs. Groups
  • PhishRIP info tabs (i.e. if improperly check ripped emails are turned into tests. This has caused issues.) Info tabs or markers allow user to hover and get more information about what action a check box or slider provides.
Read full review
  • To identify User Behaviour analysis is lacking component which we get in Splunk UBA.
  • The documentation part is hard to work on because if the new user tries to learn ES then the documentation is not user-friendly.
  • ES must ass more Knowledge objects by default to make security-related aspects more reliable and enhance the details.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
When we first discovered that KnowBe4 released something like this, we saw a demo of it and were floored at what it could do and how it could help us from a security standpoint. Gone are the days of us in IT sending out a mass email saying please don't click on anything in the email from sender "X", and it allows us to quietly and easily ensure that people don't take any action on malicious emails.
Read full review
We are very happy with Splunk and would advise anyone to take a serious look at it. It might look pricey but the rewards Splunk offers seem endless.
Read full review
Usability
I think that the system is well designed and makes it easy to fine phishing emails that have been reported. It also has a simple user interface that allows you to review and address threat emails also providing an automated component that allows for automated threat mitigation and customized feedback responses to users
Read full review
You definitely need to learn how to use Splunk to get the most of the tool. There are many courses available for free to get up to speed on the usability of the tool but it's not that simple. It will take time to digest all the data and to understand how to query for what you are looking for.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I'm not an ES user, but, in my implementation I usually try to prevent all service stops to guarantee High availability to the final customers.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
ES requires a very performant infrastructure: if it has it's performant, otherwise not. I had situation with a very performant infrastructure and I didn't notized that it was a distributed architecture, it seemed that there ware few data on my PC, othewise I experienced less performant infrastructures with less performaces.
Read full review
Support Rating
Responses to questions were answered quickly and accurately.
Read full review
It's good when it's responsive, but I've had times where I had to wait quite a while for a response. But these are typically the exceptions rather than the rule. When you do get a response it is always well-informed and appropriate. I would say they've been trending better over time with this.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
I experienced only on-line training, but the trainers were very professional and competent. Maybe it could be more useful if they also have an experience in projects because sometimes they didn't have a real project experience to communicate to the students. Anyway, it was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself, aven if I have more than 10 years of Splunk activity experience.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
It was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself. The only problem was that, when I worked with the Splunk Professional Services, I found some difference between the training contents and the information from PS. In addition is required a long experience on Splunk Enterprise for the data ingestion part, in other words I'm able to work with ES because I'm worling on Splunk since 11 years, otherwise I'd some problem.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
It was very simple to implement - with just a few settings needed to connect it to our O365 environment
Read full review
It's a fantatic product and it was very useful the presence of Splunk Professional Services for the Design Phase and the final Health Check.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We evaluated the Titan options because we have already used their DNS filtering product. However, KnowBe4 came in with a better price per user and a significantly stronger product lineup, particularly with its security awareness training component.
Read full review
LogRhythm is good for a team comprising mostly non-technical IT users. Unlike Splunk, it has a GUI log search and a good ticketing system. Splunk is better than Logrhythm for me as it provides me with the ultimate flexibility to write custom queries. Scalyr is a good tool and quite frankly lot faster than Splunk. However, I prefer Splunk because of its better Dashboards and panel customization abilities. Elastic is another amazing tool. It is hard to choose between the two especially because both have different sets of logs on them. I use both. Elastic for internal server logs, Splunk for everything else.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We have on prem splunk and it’s mostly east to setup, but we have issues keeping data separated between customer splunk deployments while at the same time only having to look at one SIEM to address events in every environment
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • There has been a 700% increase in emails being reported now. Previously, staff were only reporting 4 emails a month. It is easier for us to promote the phish alert button, receive automated remediation and rapidly respond.
  • We had no reports on the amount of phishing emails were coming through Mimecast but now we have reports for the board of trustees.
  • Every Wednesday we talk about cyber security to all staff, PhishER allows us to point out the trend and what to look out for which raises awareness. Never before were we able to talk about cyber security like this.
Read full review
  • We have a 100% success rate on all our ES implementations due to the amazing documentation and Splunk enablement on the subject.
  • Our Splunk ES business has grown 100% YoY for the last 3 years.
  • In terms of long term management and maintenance, ES has been highly stable and predictable, reducing our overhead on costly services team for ad hoc maintenance work.
Read full review
ScreenShots

KnowBe4 PhishER/PhishER Plus Screenshots

Screenshot of how PhishER Plus enables a critical workstream to help IR teams work together to mitigate the phishing threat and is suited for any organization that wants to automatically prioritize and manage potentially malicious messages.