Kobiton vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kobiton
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Kobiton in Atlanta offers a mobile test suite, providing an integration to a wide variety of testing tools and partner services. The solution supports functional and performance testing, as well as scriptless automation of tests.
$75
per month 500 mins / month
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.N/A
Pricing
KobitonSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Editions & Modules
Start Up
$75
per month 500 mins / month
Accelerate
$390
per month 3,000 mins / month
Scale
$9000
per year 7,500 mins / month
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KobitonSoapUI Open Source
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KobitonSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Considered Both Products
Kobiton

No answer on this topic

SoapUI Open Source
Chose SoapUI Open Source
SoapUI Open Source is free, which is good for light use or simple things here and there. There is a Pro version that makes things more user-friendly. I also like that custom code can also be used for doing more complicated tasks.
I like that SoapUI can have a process/flow …
Chose SoapUI Open Source
Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman.

Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not.
Chose SoapUI Open Source
Every application has its own features and UI design but SoapUI is also very good at testing. All features are awesome.
Best Alternatives
KobitonSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
KobitonSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KobitonSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
When it comes to doing or performing testing on the applications or devices then Kobiton is the best option to go forward with. Kobiton is best for both manual and automation testing. It also comes with great features like appium scripts generation which really useful and less time-consuming and makes it really good to go with.
Read full review
If you are making system upgrade project and you have existing system working and you want to imitate messages that are going in production but without making any data loads or switch it’s very suitable and convenient software. It serves well in manual test scenarios but wouldn’t be as good in case of mass tests.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • SOAP
  • REST
  • Authentication
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
SoapUI Open Source is free, which is good for light use or simple things here and there. There is a Pro version that makes things more user-friendly. I also like that custom code can also be used for doing more complicated tasks. I like that SoapUI can have a process/flow (conditional/loop/waits/etc.) set up for scripting purposes, which is good for beginners and light users. However, I think the user interface has room for improvement.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases.
  • User friendliness of the app makes it good.
  • Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing.
Read full review
ScreenShots