TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Kubernetes

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AKubernetes is an open-source container cluster manager.N/A

    Red Hat OpenShift

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AOpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

    $0.08

    per hour

    Pricing
    KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Considered Both Products
    Kubernetes
    Chose Kubernetes
    I used OpenShift v2 - which was pre-Kubernetes. (It now uses Kubernetes under the hood - but keeps it fairly hidden). Kubernetes was a ton more stable and easier to use. No more custom CLI to use in order to script together deployments. No more messy ‘push your entire code …
    Incentivized
    Chose Kubernetes
    It stacks well against OpenShift. The only downside for OpenShift is the multiple operators and the custom logic implemented in the product, plus the upgrades, which tend to be a bit longer due to the more complex implementation. Overall, these are similar products but with a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Kubernetes
    Kubernetes cluster is cable to manage multiple nodes on on-premises or cloud infrastructure. In Kubernetes, we can easily add new nodes when ever required. We can easily update and rollback our application hosted on Kubernetes with the help of rolling and blue green deployment. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Kubernetes
    I didn't have too much experience or exposure to OpenShift but I do remember that in certain areas our organization found Kubernetes to be more useful and met our needs in comparison to OpenShift. Although I can't compare, I think it's easier to customize Kubernetes because of …
    Incentivized
    Red Hat
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Nothing like OpenShift. Actually, this was our first one. We toyed with maybe doing raw Kubernetes, but with an enterprise company you need an enterprise product.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Comparing the 2, open source Kubernetes is quicker to setup by about 75%, less restrictive, and free of course, but it lacks the security and support of Red Hat, and deploying features is much harder compared to with operators. For buisiness purposes, OpenShift is just more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    We have replaced our local Kubernetes with open shift entirely and it is by far the better product. Compared to Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service, it can be more difficult to configure. We currently utilize both (open shift onsite and EKS remotely) and find advantages of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    They are all nice products, and they all have their place. But I'm convinced that from now on, instead of instantly just creating a Kubernetes cluster, I'm going to start seeing if Red Hat OpenShift is the best answer based on the project's overall needs. It's truly made that …
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Better GUI
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    It definitely has additional bells and vessels like SM, UI and monitoring/logging stack
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    To benefit from premium support.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    It's a fairly different experience compared to the other environments due to the additional security
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    ease of use
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Red Hat OpenShift has a better security posture than EKS. I enjoy the console on Red Hat OpenShift more as well. I believe there is greater observability for Red Hat OpenShift.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    They are great addition to the Red Hat OpenShift itself
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    It is a good and entertaining tool

    Es una herramientas Buena y entretenidad
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Red Hat runs in multiple cloud and on-premise environments, so offers a portable experience in different contexts.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    RedHat OpenShift can run on-prem and on Azure, meaning we can get support from RedHat from two platforms, despite it being on those different platforms.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    OpenShift can host most of them, and most come pre-packed with the OpenShift installation.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    It is the best Enterprise ready orchestration solution for us.
    Incentivized
    Chose Red Hat OpenShift
    Easier to use, better flexibility.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Container Management
    Comparison of Container Management features of Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    Kubernetes
    8.4
    3 Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    -
    Ratings
    Security and Isolation8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Container Orchestration9.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cluster Management9.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Storage Management7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Allocation and Optimization7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discovery Tools8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Update Rollouts and Rollbacks8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Healing and Recovery8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Kubernetes and Red Hat OpenShift
    Feature
    Kubernetes
    -
    Ratings
    Red Hat OpenShift
    8.2
    192 Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings8.4164 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings9.2182 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.8168 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.9151 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings8.3170 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.3157 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings8.5166 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings8.4159 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings7.8168 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings7.5165 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.3169 Ratings
    User Ratings
    KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.5
    (18 ratings)
    9.3
    (206 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (23 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.6
    (8 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (128 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.3
    (8 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (2 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)