Kubernetes vs. Solo.io Gloo Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kubernetes
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Kubernetes is an open-source container cluster manager.N/A
Solo.io Gloo Platform
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
A Service Mesh and API Platform for Kubernetes, Zero-Trust and Microservices. Solo.io's Gloo Platform includes Gloo Edge, an API gateway for application traffic, and Gloo Mesh, a service mesh control plane. The Gloo Platform integrates API Gateway, Kubernetes Ingress, Service Mesh, and Cloud-native Networking technologies into a unified, multi-cloud application networking platform.N/A
Pricing
KubernetesSolo.io Gloo Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
KubernetesSolo.io Gloo Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
KubernetesSolo.io Gloo Platform
Features
KubernetesSolo.io Gloo Platform
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Kubernetes
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Solo.io Gloo Platform
-
Ratings
Security and Isolation8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Container Orchestration9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Cluster Management9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Storage Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Discovery Tools8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
KubernetesSolo.io Gloo Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
KubernetesSolo.io Gloo Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Along with all the best features and support by k8s, the automatic container scheduling to worker nodes and also self-healing containers which is what I like the most. On the other side, when I was installing the k8s cluster on CentOS 8, it was quite difficult for me, but never mind it is working as we expected and it is a one-time effort. Especially, in my case, there are more than 7 application containers required to run and communicate with each other, so for us, Kubernetes is an optimal solution.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Complex cluster management can be done with simple commands with strong authentication and authorization schemes
  • Exhaustive documentation and open community smoothens the learning process
  • As a user a few concepts like pod, deployment and service are sufficient to go a long way
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Local development, Kubernetes does tend to be a bit complicated and unnecessary in environments where all development is done locally.
  • The need for add-ons, Helm is almost required when running Kubernetes. This brings a whole new tool to manage and learn before a developer can really start to use Kubernetes effectively.
  • Finicy configmap schemes. Kubernetes configmaps often have environment breaking hangups. The fail safes surrounding configmaps are sadly lacking.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
The Kubernetes is going to be highly likely renewed as the technologies that will be placed on top of it are long term as of planning. There shouldn't be any last minute changes in the adoption and I do not anticipate sudden change of the core underlying technology. It is just that the slow process of technology adoption that makes it hard to switch to something else.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It is an eminently usable platform. However, its popularity is overshadowed by its complexity. To properly leverage the capabilities and possibilities of Kubernetes as a platform, you need to have excellent understanding of your use case, even better understanding of whether you even need Kubernetes, and if yes - be ready to invest in good engineering support for the platform itself
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
As I said earlier also - - K8s manage the workloads better as compared to OpenStack in terms of reliability, observability & reachability. - K8s is not limited to only a single networking or storage solution as compared to OpenStack. - Networking (which is a key concept) is much simpler in K8s as compared to OpenStack. - It is possible to upgrade your applications without downtime in K8s but in OpenStack, you either have to divert the traffic or face an outage because you have to delete the whole stack & then recreate it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Because of microservices, Kubernetes makes it easy to find the cost of each application easily.
  • Like every new technology, initially, it took more resources to educate ourselves but over a period of time, I believe it's going to be worth it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots