LambdaTest vs. LT Browser

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LambdaTest
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
LambdaTest is a Quality Engineering Platform that offers a full-stack testing cloud with 10K+ real devices and over 3,000 browsers for cross-browser and end-to-end testing. With AI-native test management, MCP servers, and agent-based automation, LambdaTest supports Selenium, Appium, Playwright, and all major frameworks. AI Agents like HyperExecute and KaneAI bring AI and cloud into test workflows, enabling automation testing with 100+ integrations. From infrastructure to…
$19
per month Parallel Test
LT Browser
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
LT Browser allows users to test the mobile view of a website on different screen sizes and resolutions. With over 50+ devices to choose from, LT Browser aims to make mobile website testing easier, and ensure that a website is mobile responsive. Users can create their own custom devices and save it for future uses. Create new mobile, tablet or desktop devices and test a website on various devices, screen resolution and perform screen resolution test for website on different screen…N/A
Pricing
LambdaTestLT Browser
Editions & Modules
Live
$19
per month Parallel Test
Real Device (Includes Live)
$35
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser Automation
$119
per month Parallel Test
Native App Automation
$149
per month Parallel Test
Web & Mobile Browser on Real Device
$158
per month Parallel Test
HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
$199
per month Parallel Test
SmartUI Visual Regression
$219
per month Parallel Test
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Parallel Test
HyperExecute On-Premise
Custom Pricing
per parallel test
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LambdaTestLT Browser
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.Unlimited Access To LT Browser For Everyone
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LambdaTestLT Browser
Considered Both Products
LambdaTest
Chose LambdaTest
The reason I have selected LambdaTest is that earlier I have used BrowserStack in my workflow, but when I got to know from the industry expert about LambdaTest, then I explored it on my own, and I found that it's a very cost-effective and slightly more flexible for our project …
Chose LambdaTest
While Browserstack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than Browserstack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while Browserstack does not. Even manual …
Chose LambdaTest
What I love most about LambdaTest is the real-time device testing. It makes it so much easier to spot specific issues across different devices, something that's usually tough when you don’t have access to a full range of physical devices. So as compare to the competitors it …
Chose LambdaTest
LambdaTest has been a better choice because these platforms lack in many features like the third party integration, availability of number of devices, and most importantly its quicker than all and thats the most important aspect which led to switch LambdaTest, They also provide …
Chose LambdaTest
I find LambdaTest interface clean and understandable, and team support is also fast which is best.
Chose LambdaTest
The thing which I like about LambdaTest is it has wide range of devices for both platforms Android as well as iOS, which makes testing a lot easier without actually owning those devices. We can also set different custom configuration for devices which help in testing the edge …
Chose LambdaTest
We have used all the products in past but in LambdaTest they are providing all the facility and features in a single application which is really helpful for an organization. Apart from their support during the deploying and customized features for organization specifi makes it …
Chose LambdaTest
User friendly and easy to raise bugs
Chose LambdaTest
AWS device farm does not come close to LambdaTest in terms of capability and user expereince in mobile devices testing. Device farm lags a lot and device model updates are slower when compared to LambdaTest.
Chose LambdaTest
We select LambdaTest because of its superb features and multi tasking work properties which give us a extremely good working experience with the projects and building client trust at the same time.
Chose LambdaTest
LambdaTest has a competitive pricing which suited our budget
Chose LambdaTest
When comparing LambdaTest with tools like BrowserStack, TestSigma, and BugBug, LambdaTest stands out with its affordable pricing and rich set of features like geolocation testing and smart analytics, making it a solid choice for teams that need a balance between functionality …
Chose LambdaTest
We chose LambdaTest over BrowserStack and Sauce Labs because it offers a cost-effective, easy-to-use, and efficient cloud-based testing solution. While BrowserStack has better real-device support and Sauce Labs excels in enterprise automation, LambdaTest balances affordability, …
Chose LambdaTest
By using the Lambda Test is faster, smarter with more capabilities than Browser stack. Browser stack more expensive then LambdaTest.
Chose LambdaTest
I have not really used any other testing tools as much as I have used LambdaTest tool as it is currently the best option with the widest range of features and services. Other services definitely lack in terms of the options and features the users are being given access to.
LT Browser
Tools of this type that I have tried, I think LT Browser is the most complete of them and the most affordable on top of everything else, considering that it also offers a plan for students; in addition, I believe that it is backed by Lamdatest and all the possibilities that can …
Chose LT Browser
One such product that my team eagerly anticipates testing for responsiveness is the LT Browser. The team has discovered that it is a straightforward process to test on the newest mobile devices utilizing the LT Browser. We may start testing our web pages on local systems by …
Chose LT Browser
LT Browser has more use-cases that one could test out and be sure about the solution that QA are signing-off
Chose LT Browser
With the help of LT Browser you can perform responsive responsiveness testing for your website. You can create custom devices, it saves you a lot of time on debugging, and last but not least, LT Browser satisfies all our response testing needs.
Chose LT Browser
I have tried almost four(4) different software's before using LT Browser. Main reason is the mix of performance and responsive testing. It has everything in place to Fast Track development of responsive websites. The other reason is its integration with multiple bug tracking …
Best Alternatives
LambdaTestLT Browser
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LambdaTestLT Browser
Likelihood to Recommend
8.6
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LambdaTestLT Browser
Likelihood to Recommend
As reactnative devs we develop hybrid apps for both ios and Android and testing on different physical devices is very annoying while as with LambdaTest we can just select the virtual device boot that and start testing on the go. No need to keep devices. Sometimes clients report issues and they provide the device name and if available in LambdaTest we can just test and fix the device specific bugs
Read full review
This tool's simplicity and cleanliness will be very beneficial to our development team. Thanks to this application, we are able to test the websites of our clients at higher resolutions and with specific device settings. Utilizing scroll sync, it is easy to test responsiveness on the newest devices with LT Browser.
Read full review
Pros
  • Offers geolocation testing in automation which is amazing!
  • You can select browsers, timezone, country and run the capability to start testing instantly.
  • We could scale up with parallel testing on local environment without any maintenance cost.
  • Integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our test cycle easier
Read full review
  • Integration with Multiple bug tracking tools
  • Test mobile sites with different resolutions and screen sizes
  • User friendly user interface
  • slack integration for sharing
Read full review
Cons
  • More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list
  • It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles
  • Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles
Read full review
  • We can compare only two view ports
  • Cannot download the performance report
  • Cannot choose a browser version; limited to view port testing only
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Using LambdaTest feels pretty straightforward once you get the hang of it. The platform has a clean interface so jumping between different features isn’t much work. things feel smooth in UI automation. It takes some time to understand the overall once that is done it'll become easier. The detailed test logs and visual regression features especially stand out in helping you identify issues quickly without extra effort.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
yes always available
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
haven't found any glitch while using this
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
Read full review
Tools of this type that I have tried, I think LT Browser is the most complete of them and the most affordable on top of everything else, considering that it also offers a plan for students; in addition, I believe that it is backed by Lamdatest and all the possibilities that can be accessed thanks to the prestige of the company and its developments, make it an incomparable tool.
Read full review
Scalability
not all department, but we're using for our clients
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
  • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
  • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
Read full review
  • With the help of LT Browser, we can perform mobile testing of our web sites and applications comfortably. It's easy to set up, it's customizable and it allows us to throttle the network to monitor the performance of our website under different network conditions.
Read full review
ScreenShots

LambdaTest Screenshots

Screenshot of an automated screenshotScreenshot of mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of automation testing on LambdatestScreenshot of some of the available integrations.Screenshot of real-time testingScreenshot of responsive testing

LT Browser Screenshots

Screenshot of LT Browser Application Main ScreenScreenshot of Select Devices to compare and start testingScreenshot of Create custom device with a desired resolution to test onScreenshot of Scroll Sync to compare your websiteScreenshot of Simulate different network profilesScreenshot of Record videos and share across the team