Lattice vs. PeopleFluent

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lattice
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Lattice is a People Success Platform that aims to bring together the tools, workflows, and data needed to help business leaders develop engaged, high-performing employees and winning cultures. By combining continuous performance management, goal-setting, employee engagement, compensation management, career development, and people analytics into one unified solution, Lattice helps HR, People, and Operations teams develop insights that build enviable cultures and drive impactful business…
$4
per month per user
PeopleFluent
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.N/A
Pricing
LatticePeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
+ Engagement
$4
per month per user
+ Grow
$4
per month per user
Performance Management
$8
per month per user
OKRs & Goals
$8
per month per user
Performance Management + OKRs & Goals
$11
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LatticePeopleFluent
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll contracts billed annually. Special enterprise pricing available for multi-product and volume purchases.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LatticePeopleFluent
Considered Both Products
Lattice
Chose Lattice
All-in-one performance platform for engagement, goals, reviews, 1:1, department information, feedback, growth plans, and a robust management system and smart workflows, and a great tool for remote-first companies and seamless integrations with Slack, calendars, and each tool in …
Chose Lattice
Even though ClickUp is mainly an HR platform, it can be used for a variety of purposes. The features are just right and it is straightforward and simple to use. Many of these platforms tend to add many features, which end up causing an overwhelming feeling but it has been …
Chose Lattice
Lattice is more fully featured than BambooHR on the performance management functionality. It allows greater customization and more capabilities. If your company is mid-sized or large, Lattice is the way to go. However, it does require having some staff dedicated to …
Chose Lattice
Lattice outperforms PeopleHR for a people development system, we continue to use PeopleHR for the HR functionality of the system but rather than having everyone upload their document with no real tracking on is one of the main reasons we have chosen to adopt Lattice. Lattice is …
Chose Lattice
At the time lattice allowed us to move off these two systems and use a single service. Both GTMhub and officeVibe were better tools but having a single sorce of trueth for our employees was more important. Since then officeVibe has caught up to Lattice and I can see it being a …
Chose Lattice
I don't remember the name of the specific product that I used previously, however, Lattice is the best performance tracker that I've used in comparison to the tools used at my previous jobs - some of which were more manual created a heavier lift for the user.
Chose Lattice
This is the first of its kind and so far from my experience, I am happy with it.
Chose Lattice
They are both effective, but Lattice is more user friendly and efficient.
Chose Lattice
Way better and geared towards what we needed.
Chose Lattice
To be honest, Lattice has been the only commercially known performance tracking tool that we've used. But I love it so far.
Chose Lattice
Lattice was the only platform we did a deep dive into. It was exactly what we were looking for and the reason we went with them is because of the public feedback module they have built-in as that was a really important aspect for us.
Chose Lattice
I haven't used another item similar to Lattice
Chose Lattice
Rippling also has an org chart feature, similar to Lattice. I feel as though Lattice's org chart is easier to read and break down by department.
Chose Lattice
The above tools do different things than Lattice. Lattice is more of a review system and greenhouse is for hiring and slack is for communication. I think Lattice is better in communication as you are talking through the issues rather than someone reading them in a chat. …
Chose Lattice
I was not part of the evaluation process but having used both, I would say that Lattice has more features and use cases then HighFive, which was fitting for our HR team as they were looking for a partner that can provide more to the broader team, and Lattice has proven to be …
Chose Lattice
We previously used ADP's Performance Mgmt module and found it to not meet any of our needs. In the fall of 2020, I sourced/contacted three vendors - Lattice, Goal Span & Performance Culture & had demos of their offerings. Lattice checked all of the boxes we were seeking; …
Chose Lattice
Lattice is better in the fact that we can leave anonymous feedback. I don't believe Asana afforded us that functionality.
Chose Lattice
Compared to Zenefits that we used in the past Lattice is more powerful as it allows to link performance management to setting and achieving goals all in one place. Lattice is much easier and more comprehensive to use especially in a multi-team project setting as it allows to …
Chose Lattice
I don't think there is a natural substitute for Lattice. Trello has some of the same functionalities in terms of assigning items directly to individuals, but Lattice does a better job at tracking and grading the level of completion for each task. I haven't found any decent …
PeopleFluent
Chose PeopleFluent
Global multi-currency capability with self-service configurations without the need to use additional professional services.
Chose PeopleFluent
Talent works is one I have reviewed or used, I like it better for its ability to incorporate learning into the platform
Chose PeopleFluent
We wanted to bring in the function of the manager interaction from our requirements as other ATS are kind of static and sometimes the updates are delayed. This down time would cost our speed to market since there was a clog with the updates. I want to say it stacks up fairly …
Chose PeopleFluent
I am not part of the decision making process but the tool is very good for employees using it.
Chose PeopleFluent
We already had a relationship with peoplefluent and were offered assistance through implementation and deployment. We couldn't walk away from our current vendor.
Chose PeopleFluent
Out of the VMS's listed, I'd say PeopleFluent is solidly in the middle. Fieldglass and IQN are probably easier to navigate and more modern looking, and I definitely don't run into the login problems with them. Beeline and PRO Wand are probably on par with PeopleFluent. They …
Chose PeopleFluent
N/A -- I haven't used any other tools and/or products nor have I reviewed any other.
Chose PeopleFluent
PeopleFluent is far more advanced in ease of creating reports than any of the other tools I've used.
Chose PeopleFluent
PeopleFluent had an easier degree of use in screening and Talent Acquisition than others I have used. I would highly recommend PeopleFluent. It takes minimal training and can quickly get it up and running.
Chose PeopleFluent
They are more up to date then most other ATS
Chose PeopleFluent
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their …
Chose PeopleFluent
I like the ease of Peoplefluent and I like how we can have questions for certain areas to screen candidates before considering to bring them in for an interview.
Chose PeopleFluent
In my opinion Peoplefluent better fit our needs for flexibility and "total package". Peoplefluent's Compensation, Performance and Succession platforms work quite well with each other. Additionally the administrative features and requirements are easy to grasp and very flexible.
Features
LatticePeopleFluent
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Lattice
7.8
Ratings
3% above category average
PeopleFluent
8.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Corporate goal setting7.20 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting8.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Individual goal setting8.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility7.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Performance tracking7.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Lattice
6.9
Ratings
17% below category average
PeopleFluent
6.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Performance plans9.20 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Plan weighting7.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Manager note taking8.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans8.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Review status tracking8.10 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow5.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Review reminders7.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions3.70 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency6.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting5.10 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Lattice
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
Ratings
9% above category average
New hire portal00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Lattice
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Create succession plans/pools00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Candidate ranking00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Candidate search00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Candidate development00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Lattice
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
9.5
Ratings
28% above category average
Job Requisition Management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Company Website Posting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customized Application Form00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Resume Management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Candidate Search00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Email Templates00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
User Permissions00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Lattice
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
5.8
Ratings
20% below category average
Course catalog or library00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Player/Portal00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Learning content00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile friendly00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Assignments00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Compliance management00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Learning administration00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Social learning00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LatticePeopleFluent
Small Businesses
iSpring Learn
iSpring Learn
Score 9.6 out of 10
Paycor
Paycor
Score 7.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reviewsnap
Reviewsnap
Score 9.0 out of 10
Engagedly
Engagedly
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Predictive Index Behavioral Assessment
Score 6.3 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LatticePeopleFluent
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
2.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LatticePeopleFluent
Likelihood to Recommend
Lattice is very well versed in all things with performance and goals, but it is a separate program from the rest I work in; it would be nice to be able to integrate it into other programs I work out of more frequently. I do enjoy being able to have a program where I can track my goals and job growth.
Read full review
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
Read full review
Pros
  • Giving me up to date information and tasks that enable me to complete necessary training experiences.
  • Giving me a user friendly interface/platform that allows me to communicate with coworkers, supervisor, etc.
  • It notifies me when I have things to do, and when I have completed necessary tasks.
  • It gives me a bank of completed tasks so that I can chronologically follow my progress over time as I have been with my organization.
Read full review
  • Self-service tool to add/change configurations without the need for additional professional services
  • Amazing implementation team that makes sure your tool is up and running
  • Reporting such as compensation statements, budget and total rewards statements available for all cycles
  • Configurable feed to our HRIS to make sure data is up to date
  • Opportunity to leverage the current tool capabilities within the comp module for other comp processes (e.g. Total Rewards Statements)
  • Customer support team is great!
Read full review
Cons
  • it is not intuitive how to find a past review you wrote for someone that doesn't directly report to you
  • Lattice app (for phone) is very limited in scope and doesn't have face ID
  • sales team can be misleading; need to really double check and push on important issues
Read full review
  • I would advise better filtering options when pulling up candidate profiles, we should have multiple functions when requesting candidates profile.
  • Sometimes I get huge projects and need to move more than 20 people, it's a headache moving groups in parts.
  • A faster way to verify if a candidate has been double submitted, maybe with a unique ID or email that identifies said candidate prior to going through the whole submission process.
  • Stronger cache cookies when session is timed out get kicked out and the process reboots. Sometimes recruiters are pulled in different directions while multitasking.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is an expensive platform and other platforms are coming to market with similar features at a fraction of the price.
Read full review
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
Read full review
Usability
because it has positive impact on both employee and business. It streamlined performance review , made feedback more consistent and improved visibility and it helped a lot in setting up specific reminders for tasks and recognition.it also build transparency in setting up reviews and feedbacks. its easy to use and integrate.
Read full review
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
Read full review
Support Rating
Lattice Support is not that good. We have had to have calls with them in the past and their product team did not have a lot of knowledge about their product. I believe they are able to provide a much better level of service and that would increase my likelihood to work with them again.
Read full review
In my experience, the support team was very prompt and helpful. They had good subject matter expertise and were able to troubleshoot immediately. At times we wanted some enhancements but it was not possible due to product limitations. But, the support team was helpful in suggesting alternatives for our requirements. The customer support staff was also very polite and friendly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
These other platforms are great at their own thing- like payroll for the most part, but some don't have native performance tools at all (ADP), and some are just so shallow and designed to just check the must-have boxes for orgs primarily focused on Payroll. Gusto and TriNet/Zenefits try to be all-in-one solutions, but their foundations are payroll and HRIS, respectively, so their performance and engagement tools are either missing or severely lacking
Read full review
Out of the VMS's listed, I'd say PeopleFluent is solidly in the middle. Fieldglass and IQN are probably easier to navigate and more modern looking, and I definitely don't run into the login problems with them. Beeline and PRO Wand are probably on par with PeopleFluent. They have their plusses and minuses in terms of navigation and ease of use. Covendis is definitely worse than PeopleFluent. Covendis is a mess - very difficult to navigate, not intuitive at all with terrible workflow. Again, I didn't select PeopleFluent; my client did, and I have chosen to work with them, therefore I work with PeopleFluent.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • a different method to reaching the whole company that isn't through email or slack, not cluttering peoples inbox but having a dedicated space for praises and goal planning
  • where company data about personnel is stored and a way to engage with them and set up cadences for meeting and feedback, giving us a one stop shop instead of multiple avenues
  • a forum where we do all company surveys. from engagement surveys to mid-year reviews. makes this process streamlined and less fussy and confusing
Read full review
  • I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
  • I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.
Read full review
ScreenShots

PeopleFluent Screenshots

Screenshot of PeopleFluent Talent Management DashboardScreenshot of Recruiting DashboardScreenshot of Compensation DashboardScreenshot of Performance DashboardScreenshot of Analytics Dashboard