Lepide Data Security Platform vs. Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Lepide Data Security Platform

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Lepide Data Security Platform	Score 7.0 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	The Lepide Data Security Platform is a solution for organizations looking to protect their data, detect and react to threats, and meet compliance. Using Lepide DSP, organizations can determine where their most sensitive data is, who has access to it, and what users are doing with it. The vendor boasts Lepide DSP is best in class when it comes to platform coverage; enabling organizations to report on user interactions with data across any cloud or on-premise platform.	N/A
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention	Score 7.2 out of 10	N/A	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is used to provide intelligent detection and control of sensitive information across Office 365, OneDrive, SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and on the endpoint. It also helps prevent data loss through identifying and preventing risky or inappropriate sharing, transfer, or use of sensitive data on endpoints, apps, and services.	N/A

Pricing

Lepide Data Security Platform

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Lepide Data Security Platform	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Lepide Data Security Platform	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Considered Both Products	Lepide Data Security Platform No answer on this topic	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention PM Peter Marshall Director, Information Security and Compliance Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Varonis provided great visibility into file permissions and audit records. It did not provide DLP controls for things like email, and endpoints therefore making it incomplete to provide proactive controls against DLP threats. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Symantec or now? Brocom. Forcepoint, GPV. I'm trying to think of, there's a couple more. I can't think of the top of my head. I would say closer to the bottom then rather than the top. So because of the fact that yes, it integrates well. But in terms of the actual … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention We looked at Varonis and there was one other one whose name I don't remember. So I guess it wasn't that good. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention AI Cyber Experts Cybersecurity as a Service (CSaaS) Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Not used any product other than Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. As I mentioned in my earlier point that we did all the researches for the best suitable product for our environment, but Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention proved to be best and is working as per our … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention There are much more comprehensive and granular DLP solutions out there like Trellix and Sophos but ultimately they are expensive and require significant administrative oversight for implementation and deployment. For a company of our size, they are just not economically … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention The DLP in Exchange Online and Purview by proxy is okay, but fails to catch a lot of HIPAA-specific information. We supplemented with Barracuda to make up for it. Purview is still better at identification across the entire tenant though, Barracuda is just doing our email DLP. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention overall better coverage and integration with Microsoft products. also, it was the most reasonable solution for us. Incentivized Helpful? IC ian cambra Network System Administrator Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention The DLP was already part of our tenant so we saved money by using it. With others, we would have to built/implement VMs to connect to the tenant, which we were not willing do. Since we had access to it, we decided to stick with it and we are happy with that result Incentivized Helpful? DN DANNY NAGDEV Founder Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention As the customer already had Microsoft Office 365 E5 license, it made sense to implement Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention instead of other products. Incentivized Helpful? Shubham Jurail IT Consultant Chose Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Centralized management, supports Hybrid Environment, Easy integration with Microsoft products and cloud features. Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Lepide Data Security Platform

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

Data Preparation

Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
	Lepide Data Security Platform - Ratings	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention 8.5 Ratings 32% above category average
Data Encryption	00 Ratings	8.50 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Lepide Data Security Platform	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Small Businesses	Paubox Email Suite Score 10.0 out of 10	Paubox Email Suite Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Lepide Data Security Platform	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	7.8 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	1.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Lepide Data Security Platform	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	I would highly recommend Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention for companies that are utilizing Microsoft technologies based on the strong integrations. If a company is using other technologies (e.g Google Workspace), then Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention would not be a good fit and would be difficult to implement/manage. Incentivized PM Peter Marshall Director, Information Security and Compliance Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	It's a great product from an information protection perspective, as it can identify different types of data across tons of different locations. It's great at applying standard regulatory frameworks, like HIPAA, to management actions so you can work towards being as compliant as possible. The eDiscovery tools are very helpful when it comes to managing legal holds and discovery requests, as it's simple to freeze accounts or hold at points in time for discovery. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Advanced or specific policies have a high learning curve. We have to rely on our reseller partner to implement some of the policies that we were looking for. Microsoft is constantly trying to upsell the PureView suite and hides some features included in E5 Enterprise to try and upsell. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is super difficult. Incentivized CH Chris Hein Information Technology Director Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	Symantec or now? Brocom. Forcepoint, GPV. I'm trying to think of, there's a couple more. I can't think of the top of my head. I would say closer to the bottom then rather than the top. So because of the fact that yes, it integrates well. But in terms of the actual functionality of DLP, there are other requirements that they just don't have the features for yet. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	I think it's integral to everything, it has to be positive and the positivity has to be the ability to use Purview in a situation for an organization. For us as a provider, we're not sure if we need your services or we think we're doing this thing correctly. We also evaluate compliance team. So first thing that we may do is if we don't have a footprint in the organization and we don't know what their data parameter or their data flow capabilities are, if we don't think that they're controlling it confidently, we validate and verify. We may do a content search and that content search immediately will be the most revealing thing. They'll be like, "alright, so right here on this diagram, this and this area are the areas that you have protected that are capable of protecting CUI. How come your CUIs in all of these 18 other different areas in which you see as like scope creep happens because the enforcement mechanisms haven't been tested, validated or whatever, or haven't been effective." It allows us to do quick cleanup, quick discovery, and things like that for new onboarding clients. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Lepide Data Security Platform Screenshots	Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Screenshots