Linux Containers LXD

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LXD
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
LXD is a system container and virtual machine manager. It offers a unified user experience around full Linux systems running inside containers or virtual machines. LXD is image based and provides images for a wide number of Linux distributions. It supports various use cases, with support for different storage backends and network types and the option to install on hardware ranging from an individual laptop or cloud instance to a full server rack. LXD is written in Go. It is free software…N/A
Pricing
Linux Containers LXD
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LXD
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Linux Containers LXD
Considered Both Products
LXD
Chose LXD
Linux Containers LXD feels like a more primitive version of docker, docker-compose and similar projects from the docker ecosystem. The Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml methods of specifying a container setup, as well as the network and file configurations afforded by Docker …
Best Alternatives
Linux Containers LXD
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Linux Containers LXD
Likelihood to Recommend
6.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Linux Containers LXD
Likelihood to Recommend
Scenarios where you need an authentication server, a GIT repository the system works very well 'cause you don't need any scalability and the ease to configure and share the same Linux system image across the containers and the rollback process is quick. I didn't put any critical applications there not because of the limitations but due to a company policy.
Read full review
Pros
  • GIT repositories.
  • Authentication servers.
  • Application instances.
Read full review
Cons
  • Ease of use.
  • Copying containers from one machine to another.
  • Creation of containers with config files similar to Docker.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Linux Containers LXD feels like a more primitive version of docker, docker-compose and similar projects from the docker ecosystem. The Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml methods of specifying a container setup, as well as the network and file configurations afforded by Docker make working with containers much easier and more reproducible than with Linux Containers LXD.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Quicker development cycles.
  • Reduced need for different physical machines or servers.
  • Standardized development environment.
Read full review
ScreenShots