| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Absorb LMS | Score9.2 out of 10 | Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees) | Absorb LMS aims to empower organizations to train employees with the skills needed to stay modern and relevant in today's fast-paced world. The LMS software focuses on aligning learning needs with business demands. | N/A |
 Litmos | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | Litmos is a cloud-based Corporate LMS. Core features include a course builder, assessments and quizzes, surveys and feedback, eCommerce, virtual classrooms, certifications, course library, SCORM and TIN CAN support, reporting, and gamification tools. | N/A |
| Absorb LMS | Litmos | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Absorb LMS | Litmos | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Absorb LMS Major factor was cost. We got Absorb LMS at 35% cheaper than any other LMS software. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Absorb LMS We found the user interface to be easy to use and customizable. We also liked the support that was offered during the implementation process. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Absorb LMS Absorb [LMS] had [many] of the same features. Many of the vendors had a lower base price with additional pricing for the add-ons. From a cost perspective, the majority of software providers' costs were higher with all of the required addons. For the features required Absorb … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Litmos Most experiences with other products were through Demo access while evaluating potential LMS for purchasing in 2023-2024. Litmos was more on the user-friendly side and had a cleaner learner interface. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Litmos Adding in D2L and clarifying Articulate's RISE LMS platform I would say that Docebo had the best platform in terms of it's UI and some of the features it offered. But overall, SAP Litmos won in terms of administrator capabilities and ease of use. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Litmos Each one of the other products reviewed had one or more required features missing. A big feature that most other LMS's didn't have was a native iOS or Android application; or if there was a mobile application, it was quite frankly difficult to use and unintuitive. The Litmos … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Absorb LMS | Litmos | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Learning Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Absorb LMS | Litmos | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 8.4 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 6.7 |
| Availability | 10.0 | 9.2 |
| Performance | 10.0 | 9.2 |
| Support Rating | 9.5 | 7.3 |
| In-Person Training | - | 8.0 |
| Online Training | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | 7.9 |
| Configurability | 10.0 | 7.2 |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | 8.2 | - |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.3 |
| Product Scalability | 10.0 | 7.6 |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 8.2 | 8.3 |
