Litmus, from Validity, is an email marketing solution used to create error-free emails in less time. It is also used to build email campaigns, personalize and test them thoroughly, monitor deliverability, and analyze email performance.
$500
per month
Yesmail360i
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Yes Lifecycle Marketing (formerly Yesmail) offers Yesmail360i as a cross-channel marketing campaign management and marketing analytics solution to enhance CRM information richness and improve email marketing (and other channel) effectiveness. Emphasizing a move away from the company's former focus on email, Yesmail360i offers display and social media campaign management capabilities and integration with advanced market and competitive intelligence, as well as customer demographic and…
N/A
Pricing
Litmus from Validity
Yesmail360i
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Litmus from Validity
Yesmail360i
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Litmus offers different plan types to fit various needs, offering monthly and annual plans, as well as fully customizable Enterprise plans.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Litmus from Validity
Yesmail360i
Features
Litmus from Validity
Yesmail360i
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Litmus from Validity
5.3
326 Ratings
40% below category average
Yesmail360i
9.9
5 Ratings
22% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
7.037 Ratings
9.95 Ratings
Dynamic content
7.833 Ratings
9.93 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
7.8209 Ratings
9.93 Ratings
Landing pages
2.63 Ratings
9.82 Ratings
A/B testing
1.84 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Mobile optimization
9.1317 Ratings
9.93 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
8.6230 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
List management
1.82 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
1.01 Ratings
9.93 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Litmus from Validity
7.3
212 Ratings
5% below category average
Yesmail360i
9.9
4 Ratings
25% above category average
Dashboards
5.610 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Standard reports
8.7211 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Custom reports
7.5148 Ratings
9.94 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Product A and Product B
I’ve been really impressed with Litmus, especially the personalization features. Being able to easily plug in tools like sentiment trackers right into our emails has helped us gather valuable third-party data without a lot of extra work. I also really appreciate the ongoing learning resources—they offer tons of free webinars and articles that are actually useful. I recently read one on email deliverability that broke down specific data and gave me clear, actionable steps to improve how our emails are hitting inboxes. It’s more than just a testing tool—it’s become a go-to resource in our email marketing toolkit.
For all outbound messaging, YesMail is perfect. For Social Media management, or for customer service management, where customers or subscribers need a place to "talk back" to your organization, YesMail might not be the best platform.
Alerts: users are notified whenever comments or approvals are made on emails, with regular reminders being sent in case some were missed
Centralised: all members can collaborate and give their feedback on emails, providing a better flow and efficiency for the hierarchy of approvals.
Integration: very smooth integration, with little to no errors, with our CRM tool.
Validation: alt text, scaling and image ratios are validated
Dark mode: a very important accessibility tool used by many email users, this compatibility theme is often overlooked on other platforms. Litmus, however, makes it clear how important it is to review and track emails in this format.
Sometime, I feel like its slow to use. Speed is something which can be helpful.
AI feature. It will be beneficial for us if there is an AI feature for content updates. It can improve the subject line and content based on the performance of our past emails.
If it can provide more ideas on CRM based on industry standards, like I work in hospitality, and if it can share data and any new initiative for hospitality CRM, it might be useful for us to consider.
It's one the best tools that we've found for this type of tool but we would like some additional features like spell check so if there's a platform that features that with everything else Litmus has, then we'd potentially look to move over to that platform instead. However, we are overall pretty help with the platform
I do not have the buying decision to renew/change providers, but do have the ability to provide my feedback to those who do. Yesmail has a lot of kinks that need to be worked out. But, for those that just need to deploy emails, and house subscriptions, this is a decent platform to do so. Companies with more advanced campaign targeting/analysis needs should explore other service providers.
Litmus has integrations that make the software an integrated part of my work every day. Being able to test right within my email builder is just brilliant. Daily I also use the web interface to review analytics and spam testing. Overall it is one of the pieces of software I use daily without any complaints or issues.
Overall it is easy to use but there's several different portals you must log into instead of having everything at your disposal in one place (reporting, emails, extracting data, etc).
We have never had a problem with Litmus being unavailable so I would say their availability is fantastic. There might have been one time years ago that the site was down briefly but it also might have been a server issue on my end. Either way, Litmus was back up and running in a very short time
As with all technology, there are inevitably use-cases where you are unable to get to your original goal without some good old-fashioned experimenting. Some situations will (and are) more urgent which complicates an effective integration of a new process or a new team using an existing process but the "issues" are regularly resolved by re-starting the process specific to when Litmus is introduced to a project. If it doesn't come out the way you're anticipating, run it again and verify there is an issue before declaring all is lost
I didn’t really personally participate much in the implementation of Litmus, but from what I observed during the process, it was a smooth process with minimal disruptions. The team was able to get up and running quickly, and the platform’s user-friendly interface made onboarding fairly easy for everyone involved from the start.
This is not applicable to my role as I have used Litmus to test emails since I have started. Because of the ease of use, timeliness, consistent quality, and affordability that Litmus offers, I haven't found the need to look at similar products or organizations. If all of these features continue to stay strong, I don't plan on changing providers
We currently use MailChimp for automation campaigns. While there are limitations with MailChimp segmentation, it was much faster to get set up. We still use Yesmail for the bulk of our sending, and could probably do all the same things we do with MailChimp but it would just take a bit longer to get it set up
With our enterprise account, scalability is not an issue. I have not yet seen or heard of significant issues with user access, API connections for integrations etc. This includes down time for "Scheduled Maintenance" as some providers call them, Litmus has the technology backing to support a global team with a 24-hour workday across regions
Litmus saves our team so much time by making the QA and email review process so much easier, streamlined, and efficient.
We often send out campaigns out to thousands of members, and Litmus gives us the assurance and peace of mind that everything is working as it should before it gets sent out.
Decreases the number of email review cycles we go through.
We spend quite a bit of time troubleshooting, so it has had a negative impact on employee efficiency. When there is an issue we have to give them step by step examples of what went wrong so they can re-create it. 8 times out of 10, they can't recreate the issue.
