LoadNinja vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LoadNinja
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
LoadNinja is a cloud-based performance testing platform for engineers and performance professionals to load test web application with real browsers at scale using test scripts that can be replayed immediately after recording. LoadNinja is designed to produce actionable browser based performance data to isolate issues and debug errors in real time.
$105
per month billed annually
SoapUI Open Source
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.N/A
Pricing
LoadNinjaSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Editions & Modules
Subscription
$105
per month billed annually
On-Demand
$301
per month
Enterprise
Contact
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LoadNinjaSoapUI Open Source
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LoadNinjaSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Best Alternatives
LoadNinjaSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LoadNinjaSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
LoadNinjaSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
Good for simple requests, simple scripts, assertions, and small workflows. Also not bad with the Open Source version if savvy with code as you can do a lot with custom functionality.Free version has limited compatibility with scripts/projects created from the Pro version, but functionality-wise can probably be made up with coding. As such, the free version may not be too suitable for complex scripts or for those who are not familiar with coding as functionality/usability may be limited.
Read full review
Pros
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • Ease of implementation
  • Ease of use
  • User friendly interface
Read full review
Cons
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman. Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not. For Rest API, I think that Postman is a little above SoapUI, but not too far away.
Read full review
Return on Investment
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases.
  • User friendliness of the app makes it good.
  • Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing.
Read full review
ScreenShots

LoadNinja Screenshots

Screenshot of Analyze and Diagnose Performance Issues in Real-TimeScreenshot of Reduces Test Script Creation Time