Logitech Rally vs. Poly Studio Series

It’s well suited to medium sized conference rooms with limited IT support.

Incentivized

Great devices if you need to hold small conferences. If there is a need to hold a conference for several dozen people, I would recommend using older models.

Incentivized

• Easy to use
• Screen sharing
• Video pass through

Incentivized

• Connecting as an external USB device
• Component quality
• Convenience and ease of use

Incentivized

• Better sized equipment for smaller rooms (portable?)
• More flexibility to share the device (without Tap)
• Better automatic zooming.

Incentivized

• It is necessary to make a PoE interface on the video codec itself, for convenient connection of PoE tablet control (TC-8)
• Simplify the first launch of the device in terms of network (external DHCP required)

Incentivized

We have primarily stuck with Logitech products in the past however I have had the displeasure of using some Polycom equipment in the past. At the time, Polycom basically required all people joining the meetings to be utilizing the same systems. Logitech allows us to be hardware and software agnostic. There are multiple manufacturers providing equipment and Logitech Tap has first party support for Teams, Zoom, and others. Logitech Connect and Logitech GROUP do not have proper integration with Tap and require a user to bring their laptop along.

Incentivized

• During COVID it has allowed us to link rooms together.
• Allowed us to make orientation easier to deliver.
• Allowed us to require less people delivering orientation by linking rooms together.

Incentivized

• The devices showed good performance; there are no complaints about reliability
• The devices allow you to save several thousand dollars a year on renting the necessary equipment

Incentivized