Longhorn Block Storage vs. Tencent Cloud Block Storage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Longhorn Block Storage
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Longhorn is cloud native distributed block storage for Kubernetes, supported by Rancher Labs headquartered in Cupertino.N/A
Tencent Cloud Block Storage
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Cloud Block Storage (CBS) is a persistent block storage service designed for CVM instances. CBS protects against data failures with up to 99.9999999% reliability, including replication within availability zone. It allows users to select the CBS disk type and specification that best fits the business use case.N/A
Pricing
Longhorn Block StorageTencent Cloud Block Storage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Longhorn Block StorageTencent Cloud Block Storage
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Longhorn Block StorageTencent Cloud Block Storage
User Ratings
Longhorn Block StorageTencent Cloud Block Storage
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Longhorn Block StorageTencent Cloud Block Storage
Likelihood to Recommend
Longhorn Block Storage is well suited for most Kubernetes workloads where data storage is required, but when very high storage speed is essential, Longhorn Block Storage might not be the best solution. For those rare situations, we use local storage mounts. Longhorn Block Storage's ability to easily create/restore volume snapshots is a very frequently used feature among our dev teams because they can easily play multiple scenarios with the same data - modify data, restore it and modify it again.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Creates read-write many (RWX) volumes
  • Longhorn Block Storage is an easy to deploy solution
  • Scheduled and on-demand volume snapshots can be created using web GUI
  • Volume backups can be stored offsite on any S3 compatible storage solution
  • Backups and snapshots can be restored using web GUI
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • ReadWriteMany Longhorn volumes are still using NFS (file-based) protocol in the core.
  • Using iSCSI as main protocol instead of FC ties Longhorn to Ethernet-based LAN which is in most architectures much slower that FC-based SAN.
  • Longhorn could implement S3 as alternative access protocol to its volumes.
  • Backups, and snapshots configuration could be configured at each volume-level by administrators (maybe from additional CRD object?), because currently is configured at storage-class level which is not granular enough.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Longhorn is mature software defined storage solution that is still developed and receive new functionalities. From the beginning every Longhorn volume have multiple (at least two) replicas, can leverage manual or automatic snapshots and backup to external S3 volume. Longhorn provides nice and clear GUI for administrators, but also can be managed from CLI.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
GlusterFS was first Persistent Storage solution used in our Kubernetes-based clusters. It is file-based what in some usages led us to many data corruptions. CEPH is object-based persistent storage which can be used as file-based Persistent Storage in Kubernetes. It is also is much more resource-hungry than other solutions including Longhorn. Dell PowerScale (or Isilon) is a hardware-software solution, that provides volumes that can be accessed by file-based NFS and CIFS protocols. Recently was added access to its volumes with object-based S3 protocol. Longhorn is in the middle. It is block-based, it is build on industry standards like iSCSI, performs very well on 10Gbit or faster LAN and commodity hardware (or in virtual machines)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Longhorn is fully open source. One can try and/or use Longhorn for free even in enterprise and buy subscriptions only for environments that must be fully supported. We started with Longhorn in our lab environment and followed on through reference platform to non-production and production environments.
  • Longhorn subscriptions are not cheap, but its biggest advantage is that price-to-functionality ratio is very reasonable.
  • We have volumes with hundreds of gigabytes of data and these on Longhorn perform well in solutions where file-based GlusterFS volumes were corrupting data.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots