Luma vs. Qollective.CX

I can fast chat, share files, share screens, present, and collaborate on any work through a streamlined interface. it is very easy to use and accessible worldwide for meetings despite long distances between users, You can use it to meet people virtually using video and audio, making it easy to connect with people across borders. It saves a lot of time and is effective for both discussion and work meetings.

Incentivized

• It has different automation tools such as answers to frequently asked questions.
• Understands and responds naturally to customers, making communication more fluid and efficient.
• It has integration with social networks such as Facebook, Skype, and WeChat among others.

Incentivized

• Post-event communication (promotional emails)
• More extensive integration with Active Campaign to divide attendees into attended and missed
• Phone number field with messaging options (eg reminder message sent to phone before event’s start)

Incentivized

no other product since in the company and in the area in which I work, luma's service is sufficient, although it is true that in the future we can look for new services, when we expand, and according to the needs that arise, in summary, luma gives me has provided what is necessary

Incentivized

• Business requires marketing skills which Luma filled it and returns given is profitable.
• It's worth allocating money after because it gives satisfaction to the service we use.
• It maintains customers and vendor relations with its bandwidth in communication.

Incentivized