Lumar vs. Ryte

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lumar
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
DeepCrawl is a search engine optimization software solution offered by DeepCrawl.N/A
Ryte
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Ryte (formerly OnPage.org) is a website quality check application designed to support search engine optimization, from Semrush since the 2024 acquisition.N/A
Pricing
LumarRyte
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LumarRyte
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LumarRyte
Considered Both Products
Lumar
Chose Lumar
Lumar is great for what it does - tracking technical changes and opportunities for a site. It does so affordably as well. In my opinion it would be best compared to screaming frog as it does essentially the same thing but with less flexibility on the backend and a much cleaner …
Chose Lumar
I feel like they're both pretty similar from my experience, as I have always used the same things. However, I do feel that deepcrawl is easier to use from a UX perspective and I found it easier to get around to find the elements as I required them.
Chose Lumar
Personally I prefer seoClarity's crawler and it's built into their all in one platform.

Deepcrawl has a nice interface though
Chose Lumar
Screaming Frog is somewhat quicker, and I prefer it for issues I need to check up on immediately. But for larger analysis and full site architecture audits, DeepCrawl has a simpler interface and allows for deeper insights without needing to dig around. I appreciate all the …
Chose Lumar
All of the products I have used have been amazing in their own way, but DeepCrawl makes it easier to put it into visuals. Sometimes when you look at results, it can be quite difficult to get something easy to understand. DeepCrawl gets rid of that, the results are so easy to …
Chose Lumar
DeepCrawl is a great tool when compared to other similar solutions. What sets it apart from the competition in my experience with it, is the convenience of the cloud. In addition to having a multitude of tools faced by a digital marketer in today's landscape from analysis of …
Ryte
Chose Ryte
WooRank is slightly ahead, but the integration with Google Analytics is a real advantage of the solution. The full access to all functionalities in the trail helps to appreciate Ryte. Both UIs are quite the same in terms of designs or user experience.
Chose Ryte
We started using OnPage.org as it was highly recommended by some consultants. Although after using it for few months, we realized that it has very limited "exclusive" information that only this tool can provide.
Features
LumarRyte
SEO
Comparison of SEO features of Product A and Product B
Lumar
6.5
Ratings
17% below category average
Ryte
5.9
Ratings
27% below category average
Keyword analysis3.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Backlink management2.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
SERP ranking tracking8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Page grader10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Competitive analysis5.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Site audit / diagnostics10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Site recommendations10.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Task management4.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
SEO Channels
Comparison of SEO Channels features of Product A and Product B
Lumar
5.8
Ratings
27% below category average
Ryte
5.3
Ratings
36% below category average
Local SEO6.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Social SEO3.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Mobile SEO4.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Global SEO10.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
SEO Platform & Account Management
Comparison of SEO Platform & Account Management features of Product A and Product B
Lumar
9.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Ryte
9.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-domain support9.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration with web analytics tools9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LumarRyte
Small Businesses
Nozzle
Nozzle
Score 10.0 out of 10
Nozzle
Nozzle
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Advanced Web Ranking
Advanced Web Ranking
Score 8.2 out of 10
Advanced Web Ranking
Advanced Web Ranking
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Score 8.5 out of 10
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LumarRyte
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LumarRyte
Likelihood to Recommend
It is useful for our clients to help identify where there are any issues and what improvements should be made. We are able to use all the counts of each elements to work out which to prioritise and create an action plan for our clients. If a team isn't able to implement any of the insights from within this tool, then it probably wouldn't be worth the money
Read full review
It is great if your SEO team is young and getting to learn different tools. Or if you don't have access to programmers easily, to crawl and collect some data for you.
Read full review
Pros
  • GUI, when you run a crawl, the response is epic. It isn't just results, the results are very easy to understand.
  • Again, as pertaining to the explanation above. If you use other crawl software, it can be difficult to get insights, whereas DeepCrawl makes it easy. You can get proper insights.
  • It is so easy to put your stamp on things. DeepCrawl gives you an option as a consultant that you might not have had before, it is your backup.
Read full review
  • Great for managing risks related to SEO
  • Helps in optimizing content on the site
  • Easy to build up reports
Read full review
Cons
  • Sitemap generating time often takes a few hours depending on how large your site is
  • I would like to have more suggestions to guide optimization efforts
  • Some of the initial setup for crawlers does take time
Read full review
  • TF*IDF analysis could go more in the way how Seolyze.com is doing it
Read full review
Usability
It's great once you know how to use it... That being said there can definitely be some hiccups trying to learn the program. Even when writing this review i originally gave it an 8 and realized how many things I didn't even know existed after using it for a couple of years. Not the best 'usability' if you can't even find all the features you might want to use.
Read full review
Really easy to use
Read full review
Support Rating
I liked the platform overall. It is a good crawler. I no longer use because it's duplicate of what I get with seoClarity. I did not give it 10/10 because sometimes I had a hard time isolating site areas that I wanted and didn't get much technical support from Conductor on how to use the tool
Read full review
They are nice and quick.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Quick installation - no IT needed
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Lumar is great for what it does - tracking technical changes and opportunities for a site. It does so affordably as well. In my opinion it would be best compared to Screaming Frog as it does essentially the same thing but with less flexibility on the backend and a much cleaner UI that doesn't take as much learning. But also not quite as powerful and not as adjustable for your specific needs as Screaming Frog. So give and take!
Read full review
WooRank is slightly ahead, but the integration with Google Analytics is a real advantage of the solution. The full access to all functionalities in the trail helps to appreciate Ryte. Both UIs are quite the same in terms of designs or user experience.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • The price of the tool compared to the amount of time it saves me is a staggering number.
  • With DeepCrawl I can leave no stone unturned, which helps establish Agency credibility with clients.
Read full review
  • improving Websites is always a good RIO
  • We had already perform analysis with woorank, the comparaison was our real business objectives
Read full review
ScreenShots