Lyssna vs. Voxpopme

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lyssna
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) is a user research platform used to test digital products with real users and gain insights into their audience. Its tools and features help Lyssna to optimize users' designs and create more engaging user-friendly experiences. Lyssna is a research platform, offering a broad range of testing features including: Five Second Testing - Used to quickly test the effectiveness of landing pages, messaging and designs by showing users a…
$0
3 seats included
Voxpopme
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Voxpopme in Birmingham offers their video technology that lets clients capture customer videos at speed, analyze at scale, and share with ease. With Voxpopme, every data point used to make decisions can be backed up by the real human story.N/A
Pricing
LyssnaVoxpopme
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
3 seats included
Basic
$89
per month 3 seats included, maximum 10 seats
Pro
$199
per month 3 seats included, maximum 15 seats
Enterprise
Contact Sales
custom seats
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LyssnaVoxpopme
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual plan. Panel responses are priced seperately.Contact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LyssnaVoxpopme
Considered Both Products
Lyssna
Chose Lyssna
Lyssna is certainly the least expensive, most basic and easy to use out of the range of usability tools I have used in the past. Depending on your maturity as a business and the projects that you are doing, this can be a great starting point before scaling up.
Chose Lyssna
Maze has a more comprehensive reporting presentation compared to Usabilityhub. Maze's interface is clean and modern but it lacks a simple intuitive testing set found in UsabilityHub. The terminology of a maze is slightly confusing, flow tests are integrated with only Figma, Xd, …
Chose Lyssna
I've not found any other tools as good as UsabilityHub. I've experienced some tools that have some similar functionalities, but they don't let you add multiple formats of questions in one test (as far as I'm aware.)
Chose Lyssna
Like UsabilityHub, VWO is a testing platform but it tests against a site's users, not a set pool of testers. There is more flexibility for testing with VWO as you could use a WYSIWIG/edit HTML/CSS to make changes to a live site vs. UsabilityHub where'd you have to upload image …
Chose Lyssna
UsabilityHub provides very fast, short responses to specific questions about a static image of a website. This is useful for checking what is most prominent on a page, what they would click on, what they see/read within the first 5 seconds of landing etc. WhatUsersDo is a …
Voxpopme

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
LyssnaVoxpopme
Small Businesses
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.2 out of 10
Sendspark
Sendspark
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Atlassian Loom
Atlassian Loom
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Optimal
Optimal
Score 9.0 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LyssnaVoxpopme
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LyssnaVoxpopme
Likelihood to Recommend
I think it's well suited to any scenario where something requires feedback, whether it's exploratory feedback of current designs or validation that a new design solves a problem & additional feedback can be gathered to make it even better. I'd recommend UsabilityHub to anybody who isn't 100% sure on a design, and if they are, they need to use it to confirm that certainty.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Very fast - you can have responses in minutes.
  • Very easy and straightforward to use. The interface is clear and intuitive.
  • They offer suggestions for questions that are effective, which is very helpful for a first time user.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • More targeted screening
  • A portal of all opportunities rather than email invites
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Due to its simplicity and design it is really easy to navigate. You can clearly understand which sections you have completed and which are still left to be done. It is also really easy to change ordering of content etc, which I have found hasn’t been an option in other tools which means it is a really lengthy task of rewriting all of the tasks or questions to get them in the correct order that is desired.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Maze has a more comprehensive reporting presentation compared to Usabilityhub. Maze's interface is clean and modern but it lacks a simple intuitive testing set found in UsabilityHub. The terminology of a Maze is slightly confusing, flow tests are integrated with only Figma, Xd, Invision, Sketch, and Marvel prototypes. The final test interface shown to users is confusing and could have been simpler like UsabilityHub.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Positive - It would give us responses significantly faster than testing out a concept on a live site
  • Positive - It allowed us to reach a wider audience for our tests (beyond our website traffic)
  • Positive - The quick turnaround time and quality of feedback encouraged other internal units to want to test more as they saw the return quickly.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Lyssna Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

Voxpopme Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of